# data[].attributes.body
1. Policy inconsistencies: Lack of clear and cohesive policy frameworks hampers precision agriculture adoption.

2. Regulatory hurdles: Outdated regulations and data ownership issues hinder data sharing and technology utilization in precision agriculture.

3. Possibly, job losses due to automation in agriculture could prove costly politically in terms of votes, if those workers felt politics/laws had not done enough to protect their jobs against automation.

# data[].attributes.body
Possible solutions:

1. Clear, defined policies - perhaps the GRDC could work with lawmakers in order to clearly outline legislation around agtech such as automation/self driving/AI driven machinery?

2. Review of industry wide data policies - look at data governance and data standardisation across whole industry.

3. Provide either alternative industries, for example promotion of industries creating agtech, to employ those who lose work due to agtech.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Cost barriers: High initial investment costs for precision agriculture technologies deter adoption among farmers.

2. Economic uncertainty: Fluctuations in commodity prices and market conditions create uncertainty, impacting farmers' willingness to invest in precision agriculture solutions.

3. Financial capital availability: many farmers operate on a season-by-season basis, are unlikely to change their ways and thus could be unlikely to invest in new tech

4. Cost of maintenance of machinery

5. High Initial Investment: Many precision agriculture technologies require significant upfront investments in equipment, software, and training.

# data[].attributes.body
Seasonal variability can lead to crops and soil to be cost reductive in farms leading to farms especially smaller farms to be financially tighter when it comes to extra costs (or what is seen to be extra costs). The initial cost of Agtech combined to intense environmental factors is not feasible to growers. Perhaps a subsription service or like afterpay for growers could alleviate such barrier.

With the worlds recent focus on reaching sustainability markers it is often the case that agriculture that fulfils these goals is more expensive. Also less sustainable options may be damaging to the soil and climate in the long run even though they may be cheaper or simpler.

# data[].attributes.body
click ... (top right)

then click "edit"

:) <3

# data[].attributes.body
1. Farmers maintaining a traditional mindset

2. Lack of willingness for farmers to listen and implement new solutions.

3. Lack of awareness of Agtech existence

4. Education in utilising Agtech and the importance of it

5. Difficulty in infiltrating existing community

# data[].attributes.body
1. Connectivity.

2. clear pros and cons for stakeholders to have agtech

# data[].attributes.body
expensive technology / cost of implementation

hard to understand

non user friendly

farmers might not know how to read data

data privacy issues

connectivity issue

could be resistance to change from traditional farming practices

# data[].attributes.body
ADAPT ALL AGTECH TO BE ENVIROMENTALLY SUSTIANBLE AND ON THE SAME PLAYING FIELD

# data[].attributes.body
Grain farmers could develop contracts with buyers, and be payed on a contract basis rather than based on the yield they generate. This way it accounts for climate-based variability in yield size. Because with climate variability some yields will be huge while others will be very small.

# data[].attributes.body
Advisors to bridge the gap

government funded co-op