# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence One - Project Extract for Culture Change by A.Employee

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence One - Project Extract for Culture Change by A.Employee

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence Two - Witness Testimony for Anna.Employee

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence Two - Witness Testimony for Anna.Employee

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence Three - Personal Statement by Anna.Employee

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence Three - Personal Statement by Anna.Employee

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence Four - Extract from Assignment by A.Employee

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence Four - Extract from Assignment by A.Employee

# data[].attributes.body
Development of Professional Skills alluded to in the statement needs to be specific in relation to the KSBs

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence three, I would ask what new practices did you recognise that support a more innovative culture?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence 1 - not directly attributable to the learner, no accountability.  Would then look holistically across the portfolio to see if other evidence supports eg WT

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence 1 - not directly attributable to the learner, no accountability.  Would then look holistically across the portfolio to see if other evidence supports eg WT

# data[].attributes.body
Interested in what data has underpinned this evidence that identified change and what role the learner had in engaging with that data

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 2 Witness testimony talks about the organisation goinmg through change and not the apprentice role in leading change.

Evidence 1 -Strong focus on cultural change, would want to explore how this impacted the change. This appears to be a plan for change not evidence of having delivered change

# data[].attributes.body
The reflection and witness testimony dont add anything - too general/broad.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence two does not refer to the apprentice at all. When they say we do theo mean toe company as a whole or them and the Apprentice. I would have to assume that they mean the Apprentice

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence One: Mary Younan The change discussed is descriptive lacks deatil -. For example what was the significant cultural transormation that took place? How was the product innovation transformative?

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1 Extracts from a project regarding driving transformative change with tangible organisational benefits

High level description of tasks appropriate to meet challenges identified in relation to cultural change. Claims re outcomes that are distinction level.

Question to reveal how achieved.What role they took in overall project. If not evident then add to probes.

Probes re what were and how addressed challenges. . If probes do not reveal i&c then ask for specific example.

This to reveal personal role and so meeting of ksbs.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1: Adequate overview of the project undertaken, the various stages, results-outcomes, lessons learned and summary. I would probe for specific contribution made by the learner and lessons learned.

# data[].attributes.body
The witness testimony is quite general and would like to understand more about what the Apprentice has specifically achieved as part of this change.

I would like to understand more about the innovation that came out of this change.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence two: Mary Younan Not referring to the work done in terms of change happening or the apprentice- i.e written in the unknown of the change and the apprentice

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 4 is knowledge evidence not the pass criteria of demonstrating skills

# data[].attributes.body
I would probe around

How / why this project was identified - what metrics

How the lessons learned have driven new ways of working or wider impact - what did not go well and why

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1 - good overview -

Would like to see how evidence 1 is supported by specific research and lessons learnt

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence one: More of a project plan, scope, objectives and summary. Limited of information and depth around the bullet points, which could support more holistic assessing, for examples mentions barriers, I would want to explore these more and could link to elements of Risk management etc.

Evidence two: Verification of the change taking place in the organisation. Not specific to the individual, would want to explore this further.

Evidence three: Personal reflection, own learning around this. Could explore further the skills and how this could link into ethical leadership possibly.

Evidence Four: Demonstrating knowledge of transitional change. Elements of this document could be explored further, for example around branding and reputation? risk management and benefits to the organisation

# data[].attributes.body
Structure is ok - the detail is missing - cannot see what the apprentice actually did or how they know the metrics that demonstrate the changes made

# data[].attributes.body
Given the presentation of the project report and the possibility that it may not have been written by the apprentice if they have used AI tools, priority in the LAD is to check on authenticity and genuine contribution to the project. How did they contribute/manage/lead on this and what role did they play?

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence two, this demonstrates the Apprentice has been tangible to the transformative change process.

# data[].attributes.body
Pre-LAD - understanding - but what did the apprentice actually DO? Authenticity of the evidence - how do we join the dots? A comment in housekeeping around my requirement to understand how it "felt" for you as a leader - this helps to justify your probe areas and can often holistically help to bring it together

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence Three: MYounan

Showing the impact of the change which is good- but not telling us about what changed

# data[].attributes.body
Challenge around their reflections/learning to probe into whether the work is truly 'theirs' in terms of ownership

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 2 Witness Testimony by Manager

No reference to quality of work by apprentice. General statement.

Evidence 3 Personal Statement by A.Employee

Not a permitted form of evidence. No reference to personal role. Refers to 'we'. Need to delve into leadership role, actions taken, outcomes achieved.

Evidence 4 Research Assignment

Knowledge re approaches to change theory confirmed. Lacks application.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence four, generic no reference to own work or experience.

# data[].attributes.body
Probe the link between AOR and their role in delivering the project, specifically the communication, establishing the culture for change and enabling empowerment within the AOR.

# data[].attributes.body
Shameless steal from Pamela Hammond - set the scene from the start that you're interested not just in the mechanics of the different pieces of evidence but also how they experienced the changes/how they felt

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 4: Mary Younan Has the knowledge but lacks application and skills-

# data[].attributes.body
need to explore the apprentice's actual leadership of the project in influencing at a strategic level ie. managing the senior management commitment as well as effecting operational changes. Need to understand how any reticence was managed. Thus needs examples to contextualise.

# data[].attributes.body
Agree with Kathryn - postive view

# data[].attributes.headline
It is good to use the language of the evidence and identify that statements are made but could the apprentice expand on the detail…. 

# data[].attributes.subject
It is good to use the language of the evidence and identify that statements are made but could the apprentice expand on the detail…. 

# data[].attributes.body
Ev3 - the personal reflection could be more detailed to provide clarity to the actions the apprentice undertook to ie enhance professional skills, and a innovative culture

# data[].attributes.body
Ev2 the WT does not refer to what the apprentice did in the change - their role and accountability - actions undertook

# data[].attributes.body
Describes the impact of the transformative change project - ops efficiency and financial gains. Does not articulate specifically the role of the apprentice in the change.

# data[].attributes.body
Not clear on the apprentice's role. Summary of stages, but lacks detail on activity and how objectives were met. Alludes to cultural change, but no detail on how this was achieved or the impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Lacking the detail and prompts probes that ask the how questions to bring out the details - adding into this asking the apprentice what they have learned from a particular experience can bring out deeper understanding of both the positives and the challenges for them and how they have dealt with these

# data[].attributes.body
Personal reflection - very positive - transformation impacts in many ways and this holistic view has not been explored - resistance / negative implications. - FEEDBACK & METRICS

# data[].attributes.body
Always be curious about all evidence

# data[].attributes.headline
Some of the most succinct/ less detailed evidence portfolios I have reviewed have delivered the most dynamic Distinction LADs….. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Some of the most succinct/ less detailed evidence portfolios I have reviewed have delivered the most dynamic Distinction LADs….. 

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence is 'fluffy' and in that nothing is nailed down as to what the learner has done. Witness Testimony isn't giving much. This is where I'd look to dig into the evidence more with the questions. Looking for the actual examples from the learner to really support them in demonstrating against the KSBs. This would look to support the learner against the distinction criteria, as with the actual drill down to examples, probes could look to move into those higher order thinking skills. With the topic of change, this is usually a robust piece of work so should be able to draw out of the learner the further detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Recognises the impact of change, but does not explain or evaluate own role in this.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowledge clearly demonstrated - transformative change vs incremental change compared, example of both types provided.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 4 Research Assignment

I can see a good overview of understanding Transformational Change and Incremental Change. They provided the framework and also included examples. Further provided a summary at the end. What is lacking is critical analysis. I will probe this for further understanding and stretch their thinking.