# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
P1
P2
C
Argument construction
(i.e. Utilitarianism; Kant's theory; Relevant moral values; Biblical teaching)

Evidence (example / connection to your ground)

# data[].attributes.body
Freedom of expression and creation

P1: people have their rights to create and express what they want
P2: animators can create and express in their free will
C: Animators have the right to create and express according to their free will

# data[].attributes.body
P1 Japanese animator's behavior should not be discriminated against regardless of their religious opinions.
P2 Japanese animators might have different opinions on religion
C  Even though Japanese animator has different opinions, which is different from Christianity, they should still be respected (multicultural)

Argument construction:

Theory: THE U.N. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 19

# data[].attributes.headline
Believers may be violated and lead to conflicts

# data[].attributes.subject
Believers may be violated and lead to conflicts

# data[].attributes.body
The caricature may cause the believers to feel disgusted and feel offended. This may lead to a conflict or argument between supporters of animators and believers.

Utilitarianism, minimising the happiness, lead to conflict causing suffering to the society

# data[].attributes.body
TPS: The Japanese animator's point of view is morally unjustified as everyone has the freedom to express themselves.

P1: Everyone has their own freedom and free will to exercise their rights and no one has the right to interfere them.

P2: The act of using cartoon to caricature other people's God is an art form of self-expression which is a reflection of their human rights; while the Japanese animator's view is an attempt of trying to interfere their free will.

TH: According to Article 19 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression through any media and regardless of frontiers. Using cartoons to caricature gods is one of the ways for artists to express their own ideas and creativity, hence they have the right to do so and others do not have the authority to stop their behavior.

C: Therefore, the point of view of the Japanese animator is an act of attempting to infringe other's right of self-expression hence is morally unjustified.

# data[].attributes.headline
Lead to discrimination towards believers 

# data[].attributes.subject
Lead to discrimination towards believers 

# data[].attributes.body
Caricature their Gods lead to misconception of the reputation to those Gods and their believers may be isolated by the society

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone's religious belief should be respected

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone's religious belief should be respected

# data[].attributes.body
P1:
P2:
C:

Argument construction:
Christianity - Ten Commandments; Christianity values

# data[].attributes.headline
Animating Exaggeration is not discrimminating religious figure.

# data[].attributes.subject
Animating Exaggeration is not discrimminating religious figure.

# data[].attributes.body
P1 exaggeration is based on the original, which has no intention on humiliting.
P2 Discrimination could be abt sending messages of humiliation.

C exaggeration didn’t not commit discrimmination, the action is justisfied.

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone has the freedom to express their views and opinions

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone has the freedom to express their views and opinions

# data[].attributes.body
Some may say that cartoons to caricature gods are disrespectful and offensive
P1 Freedom is to exercise one’s rights and make choices without harming others or breaking the law
P2 Drawing cartoons to caricature gods does not harm others or break the law
C Anyone is free to use cartoons to caricature gods

Theory: Kant’s theory of universal law -> it is moral if everyone would want to live in a world with these conditions
As everyone would want to live in a world where people are free to do what they want without harming others, it fulfills Kant’s theory of universal law

# data[].attributes.headline
It will have bad influence and bring misconcept on Gods.

# data[].attributes.subject
It will have bad influence and bring misconcept on Gods.

# data[].attributes.body
P1 The japanese animator has great influence.
P2 The exaggeration of Gods could have brought misconception to the audience.
C The misconception that the animator’s popularity could have affected people’s image in religious, and influence a large amount of people.

AC: Ultilitarianism, suffering>happiness
Evidence: people’s misconception in religious could bring arguments between them and believers. -> futher caused sufferings -> suffering>happiness -> unjustify.