# data[].attributes.body
Shows little to no understanding of gravity as an attractive force. Explanation is unclear, contains major misconceptions, or is missing. Minimal or no use of scientific vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited understanding of gravity as an attractive force. Explanation contains significant gaps or misconceptions. Limited use of scientific vocabulary and examples may be inaccurate.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows basic understanding that gravity is an attractive force but explanation lacks clarity or contains minor misconceptions. Uses some scientific vocabulary and provides partially accurate examples.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows solid understanding that gravity is an attractive force. Explains that gravity pulls objects together with minor gaps in explanation. Uses appropriate scientific vocabulary and provides accurate examples.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding that gravity is an attractive force that pulls objects toward each other. Clearly explains that gravity always pulls objects together, never pushes them apart. Uses precise scientific vocabulary and provides multiple accurate examples.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows little to no understanding of the relationship between mass and gravitational force strength. Explanation is unclear, contains major errors, or is missing.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited understanding of how mass affects gravitational force strength. Explanation contains significant gaps or misconceptions about the relationship between mass and gravity.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows basic understanding of the relationship between mass and gravitational force strength but explanation lacks detail or contains minor errors. Demonstrates partial understanding of how mass affects gravitational attraction.

# data[].attributes.body
Explains that gravitational force strength relates to the masses of objects. Shows good understanding that larger masses create stronger forces with minor gaps in explanation. Uses appropriate scientific reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
Clearly explains that gravitational force strength depends on the masses of both interacting objects. Demonstrates understanding that larger masses create stronger gravitational forces. Accurately describes the relationship between mass and gravitational attraction with detailed explanations.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to create coherent scientific arguments or provide supporting evidence. Claims are unsupported or missing. Shows little to no understanding of scientific argumentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates weak scientific arguments with minimal supporting evidence. Presents claims with little to no supporting data or reasoning. Shows limited understanding of how to construct scientific arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates basic scientific arguments with some supporting evidence. Presents claims with limited supporting data or reasoning. Shows developing understanding of scientific argumentation structure.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates solid scientific arguments with good supporting evidence. Presents claims with adequate supporting data and reasoning. Shows good understanding of scientific argumentation with minor gaps.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates clear, logical scientific arguments supported by strong evidence. Presents claims with comprehensive supporting data and reasoning. Demonstrates excellent understanding of how to construct and communicate scientific arguments effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to identify accurate examples of gravitational forces in daily life or provides no examples. Shows little to no real-world application of scientific understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Identifies few examples of gravitational forces in daily life. Examples may be inaccurate or poorly explained. Shows limited real-world application of scientific understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Identifies some examples of gravitational forces in daily life but explanations may lack detail or contain minor inaccuracies. Shows basic real-world application of scientific understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Identifies several accurate examples of gravitational forces in daily life. Examples are well-explained and connected to gravitational concepts. Shows good real-world application of scientific understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Identifies multiple, diverse, and accurate examples of gravitational forces in daily life. Examples are clearly explained and directly connected to gravitational concepts. Demonstrates excellent real-world application of scientific understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to make accurate comparisons of gravitational pull between different masses or provides no comparisons. Shows little to no understanding of how mass affects gravitational force.

# data[].attributes.body
Makes limited or inaccurate comparisons of gravitational pull between different masses. Explanations contain significant gaps or misconceptions about mass-gravity relationships.

# data[].attributes.body
Makes basic comparisons of gravitational pull between different masses but explanations lack detail or contain minor errors. Shows developing understanding of how mass affects gravitational comparisons.

# data[].attributes.body
Makes accurate comparisons of gravitational pull between objects with different masses. Explains how gravitational force varies with mass differences with minor gaps. Uses appropriate examples and shows good comparative analysis skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Makes accurate, detailed comparisons of gravitational pull between objects with different masses. Clearly explains how and why gravitational force varies with mass differences. Uses specific examples and demonstrates thorough understanding of comparative analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to link observations and data to claims or provides no supporting evidence. Presentation is disorganized or missing. Shows little to no scientific reasoning skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Makes limited connections between observations, data, and claims with minimal supporting evidence. Presentation lacks organization and clarity. Shows limited scientific reasoning skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Links observations and data to claims with some supporting evidence but connections may be unclear or incomplete. Presents information with basic organization. Shows developing scientific reasoning skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Effectively links observations and data to claims with good supporting evidence. Connects evidence to conclusions and presents information in an organized manner. Shows good scientific reasoning and communication skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Expertly links observations and data to claims with comprehensive supporting evidence. Clearly connects evidence to conclusions and presents information in a logical, well-organized manner. Demonstrates excellent scientific reasoning and communication skills.