# data[].attributes.body
It is not very good. So it would be 1.

# data[].attributes.body
2 Malou

# data[].attributes.body
2 iwan

# data[].attributes.body
2 - a lot of repetition of the word 'leader' - Yannic

# data[].attributes.body
It is very chaotic there is almost no context whatsoever and the language is unprofessional, so therefore this would fit in column 1

# data[].attributes.body
2 Malou

# data[].attributes.body
1 Malou

# data[].attributes.body
1

# data[].attributes.body
4

# data[].attributes.body
4, Due to the large amounts of clarifying words and it has a structured lay out which makes it easy to read -Daniël

# data[].attributes.body
1

# data[].attributes.body
4, as it is very well organised and comes to a conclusion using creative vocabulary
-Espen

# data[].attributes.body
4

# data[].attributes.body
4, it was very well organised and easy to read. iwAN

# data[].attributes.body
4

# data[].attributes.body
1 lars

# data[].attributes.body
1

# data[].attributes.body
1

# data[].attributes.body
3:
Very clear and organised
- Malou

# data[].attributes.body
3

# data[].attributes.body
3
- Malou

# data[].attributes.body
The essay has a good intro and is structured well. However, there is some context missing as scenario's from the book are shared without background information. The conclusion is also good
- Mila

# data[].attributes.body
3, good thesis statement with evidence, including quotes