# data[].attributes.body
Supporting the death penalty can be argued from the perspective of justice, deterrence, and public safety. Some believe that for severe crimes, such as murder or terrorism, the death penalty provides justice by matching the severity of the punishment to the crime. Additionally, the death penalty may serve as a deterrent, potentially discouraging others from committing heinous acts. By permanently removing dangerous criminals, it also protects society and ensures that they cannot commit further harm, offering closure to victims' families.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty, because with the death penalty, people who are going to commit crimes should think again and reduce the crime rate. However, the death penalty must be carried out after the conference has been held, so that there are no mistakes in executing people. other.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because serious crimes, such as murder, premeditated murder, corruptors, terrorism, drug dealers are very cruel and sadistic acts that harm many people so they deserve the death penalty and if the crime is not eradicated it will give rise to a new generation that is worse than the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree about the death penalty in specific and extreme cases because it represents the ultimate form of accountability for individuals who commit the most heinous crimes. When a person takes another life in a premeditated or particularly violent way, they have forfeited their right to live within society. The death penalty, in this context, is not just about punishment but also about protecting the community from individuals who pose an ongoing threat, even in prison.

In my view, the death penalty provides a form of justice that life imprisonment cannot fully achieve. For the victims and their families, knowing that the person responsible for such devastating loss will never harm anyone again can bring a sense of closure and peace. It also reinforces the idea that certain crimes are so severe that society must respond with its strongest consequence.

Moreover, while debates about its deterrent effect continue, I believe that the death penalty does serve as a warning to potential offenders, reminding them that some actions carry irreversible consequences. Although it should be applied carefully and in the rarest cases, I think the death penalty remains an essential option for ensuring justice and public safety in our legal system.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty in cases where the crimes committed are exceptionally brutal, such as premeditated murder, terrorism, or crimes against humanity. In such situations, the death penalty is seen as a form of justice that is appropriate and balanced with the level of cruelty carried out by the perpetrator. This punishment not only reflects justice for the victims and their families, but also reinforces that there are serious consequences for actions that violate the fundamental rights of others.

I also believe that the death penalty can serve as a deterrent, preventing others from committing similar crimes because they know that the harshest punishment awaits them. Although not everyone believes in this deterrent effect, for me, the existence of the death penalty demonstrates that the state is firm in protecting its citizens from serious threats. Additionally, in certain cases, the death penalty provides an extra sense of security, ensuring that the perpetrator will never have the opportunity to commit crimes again, whether inside prison or after their sentence is completed.

The death penalty, in my view, can also offer a sense of closure or relief for the victims' families, knowing that the person responsible for their suffering will not return to society. While not all victims’ families feel the same way, for some, knowing that justice has been fully served is important for the healing process.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty in certain cases, especially for very serious crimes such as premeditated murder, terrorism, or extreme sexual crimes.

First, the death penalty can provide a deterrent effect. With this punishment, potential criminals will think twice before carrying out actions that could take the lives of other people or destroy the lives of many people. The threat of this harsh punishment could be a deterrent for serious crimes in the future.

Second, the death penalty provides justice for the victim and the victim's family. In cases of particularly brutal crimes, such as serial murder or terrorism, the perpetrator has taken the lives of many people and destroyed their families. The death penalty is seen as appropriate retribution for the crimes they committed and provides a sense of justice for the victims.

Third, the death penalty also eliminates the possibility of the perpetrator to commit another crime. With the death penalty, we ensure that especially dangerous offenders will not be able to repeat their actions, either in prison or if they might escape or receive pardon in the future.

In certain cases, especially extreme and unforgivable crimes, I feel the death penalty is a just and appropriate measure to protect society and punish the perpetrators according to their crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the critique of the death penalty. Its origins in systems of control, and its historical misuse against marginalized communities, make it a practice that raises serious ethical concerns. The irreversible nature of executions, particularly when there’s a risk of wrongful convictions, adds to the argument that it is fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, the fact that many other developed nations have moved away from capital punishment highlights the backwardness of its continued use in the U.S.

The death penalty does not serve as an effective deterrent, and its application often reflects racial and economic disparities rather than justice. By clinging to this outdated practice, America undermines its commitment to human rights and a fair legal system. Abolishing the death penalty would be a step toward addressing the systemic inequities that have long plagued the country’s criminal justice system.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the use of the death penalty. It can be seen as a strong and clear action to make sure justice is served, especially for the victims and their families in serious cases like planned murder. By using this punishment, the state shows that it takes such crimes seriously and wants to make sure there are strong consequences for those who commit them. The death penalty can also act as a warning to others, making people think twice before doing similar crimes because they know the serious risks involved. It also shows that the government is committed to protecting its people and keeping order, helping everyone feel safe and secure. By taking this firm action, the state sends a message that it is dedicated to upholding the law and making sure people can live without fear of these types of crimes happening.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this perspective. The death penalty’s historical roots in social control and racial injustice make it a deeply problematic practice. Its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, coupled with the risk of executing innocent individuals, underscores its moral and ethical flaws. Many developed nations have abolished the death penalty, recognizing that it does not align with modern principles of human rights. America’s continued use of it, despite these issues, reflects the need for a broader societal reckoning with its justice system. Ending the death penalty would be a significant step toward a more equitable and humane society.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the argument that the death penalty is a stain on America. Its origins are deeply rooted in practices of control, and it has often been wielded disproportionately against marginalized groups, particularly racial minorities. The inherent risks of executing innocent individuals and the unequal application of the death penalty only further highlight its moral and legal failings.

Rather than delivering justice, the death penalty perpetuates a cycle of inequality and violence. Many other countries have recognized the inhumanity of this practice and have abolished it, leaving the U.S. increasingly isolated in its defense of capital punishment. To truly reflect its values of fairness and justice, America must confront the troubling legacy of the death penalty and work toward its abolition. Ending this practice would not only prevent irreversible mistakes but also mark a step toward a more just and humane soc

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this perspective. The death penalty’s historical roots in social control and racial injustice make it a deeply problematic practice. Its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, coupled with the risk of executing innocent individuals, underscores its moral and ethical flaws. Many developed nations have abolished the death penalty, recognizing that it does not align with modern principles of human rights. America’s continued use of it, despite these issues, reflects the need for a broader societal reckoning with its justice system. Ending the death penalty would be a significant step toward a more equitable and humane society.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the death penalty, Although the death penalty has its flaws, it remains a form of justice for victims' families and acts as a deterrent to serious crimes

Many Americans still support the death penalty as a legitimate way to uphold justice and security. Abolishing it won't necessarily solve inequality in the justice system, and the U.S. has the right to determine its own punishments.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, the death penalty argues that it functions as a strict form of justice for serious crimes, such as murder and terrorism. They believe that for perpetrators of particularly destructive crimes, the death penalty is the only way to provide a sense of justice to victims and their families. With the death penalty, there is hope that this can act as a deterrent, preventing others from committing similar crimes. Supporters also often cite data that some countries with the death penalty have seen serious crime rates fall, although there is debate about how much of an effect this is.

# data[].attributes.body
I Agree

People who support the death penalty often argue that this punishment is necessary to uphold justice, especially for very serious crimes such as premeditated murder, terrorism, or sexual violence. They believe that for the victim and his family, the death penalty provides a form of justice that cannot be given by imprisonment.

In addition, supporters of the death penalty argue that this punishment can function as a deterrent, or deterrent, for potential criminals. They argue that knowing that the death penalty may await can reduce the likelihood of someone committing a serious crime.

Some also think that the legal system should have the right to punish people who commit extreme crimes in a fair manner. In their view, the death penalty can be a way to protect society from dangerous and unrehabilitated individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty because it can serve as a strict form of punishment for serious crimes such as murder or terrorism. The death penalty can also provide a sense of justice for victims and their families, and has the potential to act as a deterrent for other people from committing similar crimes.They believe it offers a strong message that serious offenses will not be tolerated.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the application of the death penalty in certain cases, especially for serious crimes such as premeditated murder and terrorism, because it can provide a sense of justice for the families of victims who have lost loved ones. The death penalty also protects society by ensuring the perpetrator cannot commit similar crimes in the future and can serve as a deterrent, although evidence on this varies. Economically, the death penalty may be more profitable than life in prison, which requires long-term care costs. Moreover, justice was supposed to be proportionate to the crime, and in cases of extreme cruelty, the death penalty was considered just retribution. With strict court procedures and protection of human rights, the death penalty can be seen as a legitimate measure to uphold justice.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty in certain situations, especially for heinous crimes like premeditated murder and terrorism. The death penalty can provide a sense of justice and closure for the victim’s family, as well as acknowledge the severity of the crime. Additionally, it has the potential to deter would-be criminals from committing similar acts, thereby reducing the rate of serious crimes. By executing dangerous offenders, society is also protected from the possibility of the criminal committing further offenses. In cases where guilt is proven beyond doubt, the death penalty can be a swift and final solution compared to life imprisonment, which requires significant costs and resources. Many people believe in the concept of “an eye for an eye,” where the punishment should match the crime committed. Therefore, in cases of extreme cruelty, the death penalty is seen as a proportionate and just retribution to balance the criminal act.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with the death penalty for serious crimes like premeditated murder, terrorism, and drug trafficking. When criminals know that they may face the death penalty, this can reduce their intention to commit violent acts. they should face consequences that are just as severe as their actions. the death penalty can also serve as a deterrent, preventing others from committing similar crimes. By imposing the death penalty, we send a clear message that certain crimes are so egregious that they warrant the most severe consequences.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yulaikha Sri Aulia Qurrota A'Yun - XII-C3 

# data[].attributes.subject
Yulaikha Sri Aulia Qurrota A'Yun - XII-C3 

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, the death penalty when applied appropriately and fairly, is an appropriate punishment for very serious violations of the law, such as murder, corruptor and terrorism. Despite the cost of life, it is considered reasonable in an effort to uphold justice and protect society from very dangerous people.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with giving the death penalty because it can serve as a strict form of punishment for serious crimes such as murder or terrorism. The death penalty can also provide a sense of justice for victims and their families, and has the potential to act as a deterrent for other people from committing similar crimes. In cases where the evidence is clear and irrefutable, the death penalty may be a solution to protect society from dangerous criminals who show no signs of remorse or rehabilitation.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the death penalty should be considered for serious crimes such as premeditated murder or terrorism, where the act demonstrates extreme malice and has caused deep suffering to the victim and his family. In these cases, the death penalty can be seen as a form of justice and protection for society. Law enforcement should be able to provide sanctions commensurate with the severity of the act, and in this context, the death penalty may be deemed necessary to demonstrate that heinous acts will not be tolerated.

However, I do not agree with applying the death penalty to lesser crimes or those that do not involve direct violence against another person. For example, offenses such as theft or drug use should not be punished with the death penalty. This is because these crimes are often influenced by social, economic, or mental health factors, which are better addressed through rehabilitation rather than extreme punishment. Punishing with the death penalty in such cases is not only disproportionate, but also reflects an overly harsh and inhumane approach to a more complex problem.

Therefore, it is important to have clear boundaries regarding crimes that are worthy of the death penalty. Justice is not only about retribution, but also about understanding the context behind each criminal act and seeking more humane and effective solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the concerns expressed in the video regarding the death penalty. This video highlights deep problems rooted in history and systems, including racial discrimination and arbitrary enforcement, that continue to plague the justice system. The financial burden of the death penalty compared with life imprisonment, together with the high probability of errors in sentencing, further emphasizes the ineffectiveness and inhumanity of this punishment. Moreover, the argument that the death penalty serves as a form of revenge rather than true justice is compelling. Given these factors, it is important for society to reevaluate the morality and effectiveness of the death penalty and consider its implications for human rights and justice.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree The implementation of the death penalty can be seen as a firm step to provide justice to victims and their families, especially in cases of serious crimes such as premeditated murder. These penalties can also serve as a deterrent to potential perpetrators, reducing the likelihood of similar crimes occurring in the future. In addition, the death penalty shows that the state is serious about protecting its citizens and enforcing laws that provide a sense of security for the wider community.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty argument there are several arguments in favor of the death penalty

Arguments in favor of the death penalty:

Deterrent effect: The death penalty is considered the most severe punishment and can provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of serious crimes, such as premeditated murder or terrorism.

Justice for victims: Some people believe that the death penalty is an appropriate form of justice for victims' families, especially for violent crimes.

Protecting society: By imposing the death penalty on perpetrators of very dangerous crimes, society feels safer because the perpetrators will not be able to repeat their crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree with the death penalty, because it is irrevocable. If an error occurs in the legal process, an innocent person could lose their life without the opportunity to correct the error. The death penalty has not been consistently proven to be effective in reducing crime rates. Also, the death penalty violates the principles of human rights, especially the right to life, also for groups of people who are economically disadvantaged or who come from certain minorities. This could lead to greater injustice if the death penalty is implemented.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the implementation of the death penalty in certain extreme cases, especially for heinous crimes such as premeditated murder or terrorism. The death penalty can serve as a strong deterrent for potential criminals who might commit such atrocious acts.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with giving the death penalty because by giving this punishment it creates a deterrent effect and justice for the victim so that those who commit other crimes do not do the same thing or something more evil.

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t agree with the death penalty. I find it too final and worry about the possibility of wrongful convictions. The ethical implications of deciding who should live or die make it difficult for me to support it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty because it can serve as a strict form of punishment for serious crimes such as murder or terrorism. The death penalty can also provide a sense of justice for victims and their families, and has the potential to act as a deterrent for other people from committing similar crimes. In cases where the evidence is clear and irrefutable, the death penalty may be a solution to protect society from dangerous criminals who show no signs of remorse or rehabilitation.

# data[].attributes.body
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a legal process where a person is executed by the state as a punishment for a crime, typically serious offenses like murder or treason. It involves various methods of execution and is a controversial topic, with debates surrounding its morality, effectiveness, and potential for wrongful convictions.

I support the death penalty because I believe it serves as a deterrent to serious crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the death penalty is considered an act of violence that violates human rights and the death penalty is no more effective in preventing crime than other punishments, such as life imprisonment, why is that because many people have been sentenced to death but there are still people who commit criminal acts.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the death penalty because cruel and inhumane punishment because Many view the death penalty as a form of cruel and unusual punishment, violating human dignity. Methods of execution can be gruesome, and there have been instances of botched executions causing extreme suffering.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty if it is appropriate to the level of the case, what he did and why he did it because the death penalty is the heaviest punishment in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with the death penalty for serious crimes like premeditated murder, terrorism, and drug trafficking. in my opinion, the death penalty is a necessary form of justice for punishing people who commit such cruel acts. when someone commits a very serious crime, they should face consequences that are just as severe as their actions. the death penalty can also serve as a deterrent, preventing others from committing similar crimes. additionally, for the families of the victims, the death penalty can provide a sense of closure because they know that the perpetrator has received the punishment they deserve

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty because, The death penalty is a complex and divisive issue that varies across countries. Some argue that it serves as a deterrent for heinous crimes and provides justice for victims and their families. They believe it offers a strong message that serious offenses will not be tolerated. On the other hand, opponents argue that the death penalty is inhumane and carries the risk of wrongful convictions, which can lead to irreversible mistakes. Many also point out that it may not effectively deter crime and can disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Overall, the debate hinges on moral, legal, and practical considerations, making it a deeply contentious topic.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the existence of the death penalty. This punishment serves as a deterrent for serious crimes, such as murder. When criminals know that they may face the death penalty, this can reduce their intention to commit violent acts. For victims and their families, the death penalty can provide a sense of justice by seeing the perpetrators of terrible crimes receive the punishment they deserve. In addition, the death penalty can deter perpetrators from repeatedly breaking the law. The death penalty can be part of an effective and just justice system.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this one, 'cause death penalty serves as a necessary form of justice in specific, heinous crimes such as murder and acts of terrorism. It is the ultimate punishment for those who have committed irreparable harm to society. By imposing the death penalty, we send a clear message that certain crimes are so egregious that they warrant the most severe consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
The Death Penalty is a punishment where people are forced to death by the state as punishment for a crime. It is typically reserved for the most serious offenses, often referred to as capital crimes.

And I personally disagree with the death penalty, even for serious crimes like premeditated murder or terrorism. I believe that every human life has value, and the risk of wrongful convictions is too great to justify such an irreversible punishment. Additionally, studies suggest that the death penalty may not effectively deter crime more than life imprisonment. I think it's important to consider rehabilitation and the potential for individuals to change. Ultimately, I believe in upholding human rights and the value of life

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the death penalty, Although the death penalty has its flaws, it remains a form of justice for victims' families and acts as a deterrent to serious crimes. The high costs and lengthy legal processes show caution in ensuring only the guilty are punished. Many Americans still support the death penalty as a legitimate way to uphold justice and security. Abolishing it won't necessarily solve inequality in the justice system, and the U.S. has the right to determine its own punishments.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the death penalty, although controversial, remains a legal and just option in cases of particularly heinous crimes. This punishment provides justice for victims, deterrence for potential perpetrators, and protects society from harm. Despite the risk of error, the justice system must ensure that the death penalty is only applied in truly eligible cases and after a fair legal process.

# data[].attributes.body
What is your opinion about death penalty? Do you agree or disagree with the death execution to person who sentenced for a major criminal offense, such as premeditated murder, corruptor, terrorism, drug dealer?

# data[].attributes.body
Write one issue about analytical exposition text!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that The death penalty must be carried out for serious crimes that have been clearly proven and have gone through a long court process and in accordance with established regulations, regardless of who the person is. The death penalty aims to create a deterrent effect on other people who have or will commit crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the death penalty for the following reasons:

1. Risk of Judicial Error: The legal system is not perfect, so there is a possibility that innocent people could be sentenced to death. This is one of the strongest reasons cited by opponents of the death penalty.

2. Does Not Reduce Crime: Studies show that the death penalty does not significantly lower crime rates compared to life imprisonment.

3. Violation of Human Rights: The death penalty is considered a violation of the right to life, which is a fundamental human right. Several human rights organizations oppose it based on this principle.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree by supporting the death penalty on the grounds that it provides justice for victims, especially in cases of serious crimes such as murder.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with giving the death penalty because by giving this punishment it creates a deterrent effect and justice for the victim so that those who commit other crimes do not do the same thing or something more evil.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the death penalty for premeditated murder because the perpetrator intentionally took a life. This sentence provides a deterrent effect and a sense of justice for the victim's family.

# data[].attributes.body
opinion: I disagree with the death penalty because it is a controversial issue that involves moral, ethical, and legal considerations. Many also oppose it due to the risk of judicial errors, its disproportionate impact on vulnerable groups, and the belief that everyone deserves a chance for rehabilitation. The death penalty is also considered not always effective as a crime deterrent, and some countries have abolished it on human rights grounds.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree: "I understand that the risk of mistakes can occur, but many countries have very strict legal systems to reduce the risk. And for me, the death penalty is a form of responsibility taken for a serious crime."

# data[].attributes.body
What is your opinion about death penalty? Do you agree or disagree with the death execution to person who sentenced for a major criminal offense, such as murder, premeditated murder, corruptor, terrorism, drug dealer?

# data[].attributes.body
Write a dialogue between two friends where one asks for the other's opinion on a new movie release. You can work with your chairmate, then upload your dialogue below by clicking the icon +. Don't forget to put your name. E.g. Adinda Saras & Wina

# data[].attributes.body
Describe your opinion on the use of technology in education. Start with 'In my opinion...'

Write your opinion based on the situation, don't forget to mention your name first.

# data[].attributes.body
You overhear a discussion about climate change that talked about "The Overheats in Europe". Write a response accepting someone’s opinion, even if you disagree. Don't forget to write your name.

# data[].attributes.body
Assalamu'alaikum wr.wb. How is it going, Students? Hope that everything's running well with all of you. Welcome to padlet of mine. In this grader, I am gonna accompany you to learn English. Here are some material that will be delivered in one year:

1. Stating Opinion

2. Argumentative Text

3. Hortatory Exposition Text

4. Discussion Text

5. Narrative Text

Here I provide you with a few material about Stating Opinion. Learn it well. But first, please confirm your presence in the link given (above). Then do the exercise given. Submit your task on the time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Make sure your name is listed in the following form!

# data[].attributes.body
An opinion is a belief or judgment that is not based on proof or certainty. It represents someone's thoughts or feelings about a particular topic.

# data[].attributes.body
When you want to know what someone thinks about a particular topic, you can say: 'What do you think about...?' or 'How do you feel about...?' Here are some examples:

1. What do you think about our new project?
2. How do you feel about the latest news?

# data[].attributes.body
Person A: What do you think about the new school regulations?
Person B: I think they are quite beneficial for students.

# data[].attributes.body
When expressing your own thoughts, you can use phrases like: 'In my opinion...' or 'I believe that...'. Here are some examples:

1. In my opinion, the movie was quite intriguing.
2. I believe that education is the key to success.

# data[].attributes.body
Person A: How do you feel about online classes?
Person B: In my opinion, they are a great alternative during the pandemic.

# data[].attributes.body
When you disagree with someone, you can use phrases like: 'I see your point, but...' or 'I understand, however...'. Here are some examples:

1. I see your point, but I think there might be a better solution.
2. I understand, however, I don't believe that's the best approach.

# data[].attributes.body
Person A: I think we should cancel the field trip.
Person B: I see your point, but I believe the students would benefit from it.

# data[].attributes.body
Agreeing with someone can be done using these phrases: 'I agree with you because...' or 'That's a great point...'. Here are some examples:

1. I agree with you because it ensures fairness.
2. That's a great point; it does make the process smoother.

# data[].attributes.body
Person A: We should extend the library hours.
Person B: That's a great point, it would help students who need extra study time.