# data[].attributes.body
Do you have a breakdown of who and/or where the Engaged Future Group comes from? (HE vs outside; Senior vs More Junior; full-time vs fixed terms; etc.,) Just for interest in representation...

Can you tell us a bit about the make-up of the Engaged Futures group?

# data[].attributes.headline
Linking this work to other campaigns in HE

# data[].attributes.subject
Linking this work to other campaigns in HE

# data[].attributes.body
How might this work relate to other HE 'reviews' taking place e.g recently announced taskforce for efficiency and transformation led by Nigel Carrington?

# data[].attributes.body
How are non engagement professionals within HEI (and other relevant folk) being engaged with this work?

# data[].attributes.body
Happy to be part of a coalition of the willing, but there also needs to be a process of "persuading" the unwilling...how do we do that?

# data[].attributes.body
Is there considerations for regional differences, so it won't be a one size fits all?

# data[].attributes.body
What do we know about from HE good practices from other countries? Also I'm assuming that the changes will have to be endorsed by government policies ?

# data[].attributes.body
Sadly I am not available for either of the Catalyst Three sessions and I know Sian mentioned another way of being involved. Can this info please be shared?

# data[].attributes.body
Can we put ourselves forwards now as being interested in working groups? Or do we have to wait until you announce them?

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder if my role in the catalyst group could be sharing my research into the public? Or perhaps organising public engagement events with the public?

# data[].attributes.headline
Sharing and Accessing Resources - Communicating with fellow Catalysts

# data[].attributes.subject
Sharing and Accessing Resources - Communicating with fellow Catalysts

# data[].attributes.body
It could be really interesting to enable an ongoing virtual space where catalysts could share resources, best practices, and engage in a forum as a network to continue this threads and move to a continuous consultation model, not as a one off

Not Basecamp please! It is hard to navigate

Jerneja Rebernak: happy to join in conversation on possible platforms to choose from

# data[].attributes.body
It feels like we are building a community of interested people, but I did wonder how we link in all the good work that is going on around the country, the work Medr are funding, the work Manchester are doing with CityREDI etc

# data[].attributes.body
Is there a mechanism for finding potential collaborators for conducting our own conversations and applying for funding to support those? I feel there will be strength in collaborating rather than applying as an individual, or at least knowing if there is the possibility of that, but I don't know who else is in this group, and we won't know who else is interested in applying, say from our region, or on a similar subject

# data[].attributes.body
Does the NCCPE have any influence on the REF?

# data[].attributes.body
Following this, can we get a copy of our application form so we have a reminder of our initial thoughts

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like I already filled out an application form when expressing interest in this. Is this something we need to sign up to again, or will you be using the info you already have from us?

# data[].attributes.body
Can you please remind us of the aim of this work?

Is the catalyst group focusing on phase3/H3? The imagined future?

# data[].attributes.body
By being in the catalyst group, is this the opportunity to be a part of the collaboration and be a part of this process? Or does that come more in the working groups?

Or is that opportunity only to the Engaged Futures group?

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of the information in this briefing so far wouldn't be accessibile to the majority of people not involved with HE, and possibly some within HE. Is this a focus?

# data[].attributes.body
With the wide differences in the priorities in many institutions that are teaching focused and less research intensive will these factors also be considered in thinking around the different futures as of course one size cannot fit all institutions?

# data[].attributes.body
Are you interested in supporting pilot activity?  there are a couple of new activities coming up with partners which could be interesting test-case for how far we can go embedding our capabilities for research in and with community.

# data[].attributes.body
In the spirit of centering community, how much of a presence is there from wider community or infostructure representatives within both the catalyst group and working group? Are you looking for more community involvement?

# data[].attributes.body
It could be really interesting to enable an ongoing virtual space where catalysts could share resources, best practices, and engage in a forum as a network to continue this threads and move to a  continuous consultation model, not as a one off

# data[].attributes.body
Please will you circulate shared links, catalyst inbox, dates, slides etc by email so info is "inbox-searchable

# data[].attributes.body
Will we already be in thematic groups by that stage of wanting to do our own conversations, or will the themes already be shared by then, to make thinking of a topic within that easier?

# data[].attributes.body
Will there be a social media presence so we and promote the activity as we go along?

# data[].attributes.body
We will accept applications to the working groups once they are announced and we know the themes for them. The working groups will be informed through the consultation which is happening between now and the end of July 2025.

# data[].attributes.body
Thanks for applying to the catalyst group. Once you are a member of the group you can join in the consultation opportunities. You are also eligible to apply for funding - but will need to complete a funding application for this.

# data[].attributes.body
Over the next few months we will be advertising opportunities to get involved. These will include NCCPE led sessions, as well as sessions led by our catalysts. All opportunities will be advertised on the catalyst website

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, we will share the themes that NCCPE will be focusing on and then inviting applications for you to submit your own consultation ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
The Catalyst group is informing the project at all stages. This includes Phase 1 mapping- Horizon 1 (what you feel needs to change), Horizon 3 (Your positive vision for the future), Phase 2- Identifying Horizon 2- promising practices, Phase 3- Developing approaches and tools for change.

# data[].attributes.body
The catalysts are part of the overall project. You can contribute to all phases of the project. We hope you will consider joining a thematic group or working group as part of this, but you do not have to do this to participate in the consultation. We will be sharing all opportunities via email and on the catalyst web pages.

# data[].attributes.body
The focus of this work is on creating a system that is supportive of engagement work rather than supporting public engagement work itself.

# data[].attributes.body
We are happy to facilitate this and will be using a Padlet board for you to post your calls for collaborators.

# data[].attributes.body
We recognise that there is differentiation across the UK, and that one size does not fit all. As we develop this work we will be exploring how the themes and actions relate to nations and regions, and ensure that our collective work is aligned effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity would need to be directly linked to the themes and conversations that emerge from the first phases of the project. The focus will be on routes to change-making for realising the visions that arise in the first phases of the project.

# data[].attributes.body
We welcome your ideas for convening conversations with people who are less 'engagement positive'. In phase 3 we will be thinking about approaches for persuading others amongst other 'change-making' activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, we will share LinkedIn and other social media posts for you to reshare throughout the programme of work.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes - if you would like a copy of the responses you gave in your application, please request by emailing NCCPEcatalysts@uwe.ac.uk. Please ensure you email from or state the email address that you signed up with, or your full name.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, these will be shared after the workshop. We will also host material on the Catalyst web pages: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/engaged-futures-catalyst-group-welcome

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Engaged Futures Catalyst Group: Welcome | NCCPE

# data[].attributes.body
Please share suggestions with us if you know of any. The different consultation and working groups may use these.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, we are not working towards creating a one size fits all future.

# data[].attributes.body
We want to hear from a variety of perspectives. It is likely that aspects of catalyst conversation are relevant to particular groups and as these topics become apparent we will invite you to draw on networks that extend the conversation to people living and working outside of HE either as contributors to discrete consultation exercises or as catalysts themselves depending on availability and interest. We will also have a public consultation that will run alongside the work of the catalysts.

# data[].attributes.body
Comparing and contrasting with other country contexts and political landscapes is something that we are keen to do in later stages of the process. We are keen to think through the scope of our change making work (this will form part of our initial conversations with you in the February meetings) and where/who and what we will need to connect with as a movement once we have identified the changes that we would like to see.

# data[].attributes.body
Where relevant we will be working to ensure that the Engaged Futures work informs the wider work of the NCCPE. Please see this collection of material on our web pages for a story of how NCCPE has been involved in the REF and its evolution. https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/resources/collections/ref-collection

# data[].attributes.body
We expect the Catalyst group to grow over time. We will be seeking to engage with groups not currently involved, and for different framings and languages to emerge. This is something that we hope Catalysts will support. We want to ensure that there are ways for anyone with a vested interest and something to say to get involved to the degree and depth that they would like.

# data[].attributes.body
We imagine the smaller thematic discussion groups in Phase 2 and working groups in Phase 3 of three horizons to use platforms if they feel these helpful. We are also open to Engaged Futures evolving to the point where it can become a self-sustaining online community.

# data[].attributes.body
We have been reaching out to people we know, and encourage our Catalysts to do likewise, to encourage them to get involved. In addition, we will be working with the Catalysts to identify H2+ practices, and are keen to bring together as many excellent examples of great practice that we can.

# data[].attributes.headline
Engaged Future Group / Catalyst Group members

# data[].attributes.subject
Engaged Future Group / Catalyst Group members

# data[].attributes.body
Is it possible to share further details about those involved in the Engaged Futures Group and Catalyst Group (e.g. organisation names)? This would be really helpful to try to find, network and collaborate with others involved from within my organisation

# data[].attributes.body
Has any work been done to clearly list or define user needs of the various user groups involved in all this? I may just be coming from a naive position (and a biased one as a user centred designer). But I can't help feel there are some shared definitions missing about who we are imagining the future for, beyond the very broad label of "community and society". And by extension, what they need, and why the higher education system should even exist for them.

# data[].attributes.body
This is work that action development groups might seek to do in Phase 3 of the project. We are also conducting a public consultation starting at the end of 2025.

# data[].attributes.body
This is an example of H2+ work. Part of the three horizons process is to identify actors already working towards the values and goals identified by participants and looking for ways in which we can align efforts. We have identified Domains of Action where we see existing energy and potential alignment in the system. One is entitled 'Building a Movement', another is 'Stewarding the System'. This work looks like it might be able to contribute to the thinking and efforts in these Domains.