# data[].attributes.body
1. FF are irreplaceable, because they have the highest energy density.
Their transportiation is easy, so the countries without their own deposits are less isolated
Also the most of car require FF, so there is way to get rid of our addiction to FF

# data[].attributes.body
1 text:
1.  Fossil fuels are irreplaceable
2. Fossil fuels are a stable and non-toxic energy source relative to most other proven energy sources
3. We cannot continue to use fossil fuels at the rate we do while waiting in hopes of an all-encompassing alternative.
2 text:
1. Renewable energy would not be able to replace fossil fuels
2. While many proponents of the transition have lauded this recent study, we should be much more skeptical given the unrealistic assumptions upon which the study is based, the massive costs excluded from the study, and the history of energy transition
3. Proponents of renewable energy have sought to demonstrate that economies can run solely on wind and solar at no significant cost to their citizens or economies
3 text:
1. By scaling up renewable energy, countries can sharply reduce one major source of the problem: energy-related CO₂ emissions.
2. Still, a number of estimates and studies indicate that a century is likely the minimum amount of time needed for a total overhaul of the energy system and a complete transition to renewables, even if significant progress is underway

# data[].attributes.body
The only energy source comparable to fossil fuels, with respect to energy density, is nuclear energy.
- nuclear power comes from highly toxic sources which makes transporting it extremely difficult
- nuclear power is extremely dangerous for people

# data[].attributes.headline
Why it is Impossible to Replace Fossil Fuels with Alternative Fuel Sources

# data[].attributes.subject
Why it is Impossible to Replace Fossil Fuels with Alternative Fuel Sources

# data[].attributes.body
-  there are no clean alternatives
- there are no fuels with comparable energy density to fossil fuels
-  fossil fuels is that fossil fuels are extraordinarily energy dense

# data[].attributes.headline
Massive cost of constructions that produce "green energy"

# data[].attributes.subject
Massive cost of constructions that produce "green energy"

# data[].attributes.headline
Can renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels?

# data[].attributes.subject
Can renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels?

# data[].attributes.body
According to renewable energy policy think tank REN21, most barriers to moving out of the fossil fuel age are political rather than practical.
Adherence to the commitments set out in the agreement will be a key factor in the move away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.
Renewable technology costs are lower than ever, and digitalization can facilitate smoother integration of the power, heating, cooling and transport sectors.
According to the International Energy Agency, solar energy is one of the few technologies currently on track to meet global climate targets. It is not just the environment that stands to benefit, but economies, too: in the majority of countries, solar PV (photovoltaic systems), along with onshore wind, are the most inexpensive ways of introducing new electricity-generating plants.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason there are no viable alternative or “clean” fuels that can replace fossil fuels is that fossil fuels are extraordinarily energy dense. In addition, it is easy to generate energy from fossil fuels and — more importantly — to capture the energy produced during fossil fuel combustion. And, it is equally simple to transport fossil fuels.

# data[].attributes.headline
Why it is Impossible to Replace Fossil Fuels with Alternative Fuel Sources

# data[].attributes.subject
Why it is Impossible to Replace Fossil Fuels with Alternative Fuel Sources

# data[].attributes.body
We cannot replace fossil fuels with anything comparable, at least not with any of the energy sources currently available to us.
There are no clean alternatives
Products made from fossil fuels are part of nearly every person’s life around the world.
Fossil fuels are a stable and non-toxic energy source relative to most other proven energy sources. Moving fossil fuels from one place to another is not difficult
Wind power simply does not generate enough energy to be considered a viable source of energy for powering cars.

# data[].attributes.body
2. Renewables depend on the weather, so the supply would not be stable, and the great percent of time there would be no elecricity.
The optimistic assumpions seem to be hardly realistic because of the ignorance of geographical circumstances
There are no economics, that can run only on wind and solar energy
Countries do not have equal opportunities for development of renewable energy sources

# data[].attributes.body
3. By switching on renewables a significant ecological problem may be solved, but this switch wouldn't be fast and cheap