# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer's network is the strongest because she has more relationships with other people and they in turn develop other relationships with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
Jeniffer's network is critical and more important because she is connected to many people and they are all connected to each other. This means that there are shared interests between the different persons and entities.

# data[].attributes.body
John seems to have absolute power over a few people, and moderate power over a group. All in all he has a smaller network than Jennifer. But he is key for his small nework. As he manages the input for his direct contacts who have no other contacts and also the input for the group which gives him sort of power over this group. Without him, they cannot "move".
Jennifer seems to be involved in a much bigger network. When she uses her power-skills right, she can influence others who themselves influence over their connections which are not directly linked to her (kind of ripple effect). Therfore she has more power as when using wise tactics she can influence more, but they can still exist and continue without her. So it depends on her strategy and her kind of power (if her power is making networks work independently, then she is the winner here)

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer's network is more powerful. Not only because she is positioned at its center, but also because of the interconnections between network members. It's a more cohesive network, and she is the hub of the wheel, with the interconnectivity flowing through her. Despite the suggested answer saying that John's network gives more power, I am inclined to disagree. It really comes down to whether we're looking at the power of the network, or the power of the network curator. I think the collective strength approach is more on-brand these days (for example, see the book "New Power").

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer has more power because she is connected to more people and has more networks which give’s her the power of knowledge and influence over a large number of people.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe John has more power because he has more "one-to-one" edges connecting him to other nodes (people). Jennifer, on the other hand, is merely a small part inside a very interconnected network that has similar edges between all nodes.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer is connected to numerous people and is at the centre of all interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I think it is John's network that gives him more power, becaue he has exclusive relations with specific stakeholders.
For the most part the other individuals do not have interaction beetween them, being John the only one that can stablish connections with them.
There is a part of his network that is interconnected which also makes it easier for work flow and trust stablishement f needed.

# data[].attributes.headline
Muhammad Yanuar Farhanditya, IOM Indonesia

# data[].attributes.subject
Muhammad Yanuar Farhanditya, IOM Indonesia

# data[].attributes.body
Probably John, because he is central in the network therefore irreplaceable. on the other hand, Jennifer's network is interconnected with each other and therefore lack the exclusivity that John has.

# data[].attributes.headline
Manuel Mabuiangue; IOM Mozambique; Maputo

# data[].attributes.subject
Manuel Mabuiangue; IOM Mozambique; Maputo

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer has more power based on the dimension and extension of the web but for John we could say he has less power.

But if we look both of them holistically they have equal power because they each have 10 people under their command.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer.

My assumption is that the more connections a person has, the more influence (and power) that person holds.

# data[].attributes.body
JOHN
John seems to have direct connection with the target stakeholders as compared to Jennifer. If you have blurred or indirect connections which are not reliable, they can backfire.
Also, establishing a connection is easier than converting it into meaningful engagement or relationing. Just take example of LinkedIn where everyone is connected to hundreds of other professionals but these are not reliable association.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Jennifer is more powerful because her relations are broader. So when she wants to influence, she has more sources. She can have de ability to influence "A" by doing directly or using B, C, D, E in the process. While John only has one way of doing it.

# data[].attributes.body
John has a smaller network by powerful connections, while Jennifer has a much bigger one, which might dilute her power, but it also seems tight-knit, so I'm going to go with Jennifer's.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that John's network gives more power as he is the direct role in all his connections. Jennifer, on the other hand has more connections who are all interlinked, yielding some of her power.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, John seems to have more direct connections and relationships among the two. Hi direct linkages with everyone may give him the leverage to advance his agenda and earn the goodwill of his stakeholders, thus all his interventions seem to come full circle.
Jennifer on the other hand seems to have limited relationships/connections which is why it seems her interventions/initiatives are not coming full circle and there are gaps that need to be filled.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer has way more connections. If she´s organized and has a good support team, then she´s more powerful because she can influence more people towards the cause.

However, if Jennifer is not organized and forgets to reach out to any of them, they will bypass her and she losses her power.

John is more focused, which gives him an advantage, but he has less connections, which means he might have to call Jennifer.

# data[].attributes.body
I think John has a direct connection with everybody in his network therefore i think he has more power than Jennifer since her network is overcrowded and some lines of connection don't even pass through her to get to the end point. John has less connections but will definitely reach all of them unlike Jennifer.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe each on of them is at a different stage in building his network. in Jennifer case, she built her network and its sustainable with and without her. while John is still developing its network that is limited to selected stakeholders.
on another hand and depending on the subject, John would have greater power to deliver on the change required based on clear roles and direct connections.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Jon has much more power. Jennifer has too much connections that it would be hard for an individual to master all these interactions and connections and he may fall overstretched with no real mastery of all these connections. Jon might be more powerful as she has few bur selected connections on which she exerts real influence

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer's network is wider than John's. I believe she has more connection but John who has more control over his network as he is central to it. So he is more influential and powerful.

# data[].attributes.body
John has, or rather has the potential to exert more power. He is the central point as all roads lead to him, one way or the other. On the hand Jennifer's network is too convoluted and crowded and in some instances she is even bypassed.

# data[].attributes.headline
Jeshta Connery, RCO Mauritius & Seychelles

# data[].attributes.subject
Jeshta Connery, RCO Mauritius & Seychelles

# data[].attributes.body
John may have more power, as he is in the epicentre with direct access to more individuals / organisations than Jennifer who has to go through others to reach her other points of contact.

# data[].attributes.body
While it appears that Jennifer has a much wider network of influence, it does really depend on who the blue dots are. If John is a to influence decision makers and leaders, and can this influence policy change, he potentially has more power than Jennifer, despite her large network.

# data[].attributes.body
John seems having a stronger network as he is the focal point in all of them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think John has more power because he is directly connected to the stakeholders and exercise influence a power in a limited and less complex structure as compared to Jenifer

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer....more connections means more people she knows and who know Jennifer...capacity to influnee directly and indirectly

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Jennifer has more power, as she is able to influence a wider network of people, and has more points of leverage.

# data[].attributes.body
John has more power as his connections rely on him to keep functioning within the network. This is an example of authoritarian leadership. The democratic model based on attraction rather than fear would be Jennifer's.

# data[].attributes.body
John's network gives more power because it's centralized and he, as the central dot, can connect to every other dot yet the other dots are not interlinked (as opposed to Jennifer's network).

# data[].attributes.body
John's network has stronger anchored networks because they are all linked at one point at the centre. This means that he can rely on the various aspects within his network for professional and personal assignemnts.

# data[].attributes.body
John

In this case John has the advantage of being central to each connection in his network, for any move made he is linked. A powerful and strategic position he can leverage.

# data[].attributes.headline
Agnes Kante, UNAIDS Liaison Office, Addis Ababa

# data[].attributes.subject
Agnes Kante, UNAIDS Liaison Office, Addis Ababa

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer
Given than the question is which of those two networks gives more power, I believe this is the one of Jennifer because 1/she is at the center 2/there are extensive 3/she has many more relations she can leverage or influence to achieve a result than John who has few (even if they heavily rely on him).

# data[].attributes.body
Jenifer's network has less power, based on the interconnected nature of relations. For John, removing him from the picture means that the network will collapse as it is reliant on John. For Jenifer, the network is interconnected and will not collapse if Jenifer is removed from the picture. Therefore, John's network has more power.

# data[].attributes.body
I think John's network gives him more power because if we take him out of the picture, there is not such network.

On the other hand, if Jennifer is left out, network remains almost intact.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer is in the position of more power.

I always believe that more connections means more power.

After I looked at the suggested answer which states that John holds more powerful position I feel more interested to know more on the different concepts of power and positions. Thanks

# data[].attributes.body
John’s network is more strategic as almost all his contacts need him to be connected to others.

# data[].attributes.body
John seems more powerful because he can influence more and control the independent individuals. While for Jennifer it  even though she is connected the individuals have the power to influence themselves without her.
The  rule is to have capacity that A has to influence the behavior of B, so B acts in accordance with A’s wishes.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe they have the same level of power (over 10 dots each), although Jennifer has a strong network (maybe more democratic? or with more interactions?) . It´s necessary to assess also ther knowledge and position, which can´t be done only with this image.

# data[].attributes.body
Checking the tow networks, I truly believe Jennifer has more power. Why? Because she generates continuous and consistent interactions between the parts and that's the key of their strong network. Otherwise, John generate a total dependency, the power is not in the groups, it is intrinsically in that guy.

# data[].attributes.body
John's network is a positional power where he has an exclusive central power to exercised over others.

# data[].attributes.body
At first, I wanted to say, Jennifer - look at the volume! But then I thought of how strong the strings are in both schemes and now I agree with colleaguess - John's is stronger: he has more direct and him-oriented connections and less risks.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe John has more power, as he the primary nexus in the network.

# data[].attributes.body
It appears that Jennifer has more equal to equal relations, meanwhile John seems to be holding more hierarchy and power networks.

# data[].attributes.body
John gets more power from his network.

As a central hub connector, removing him from the situation splinters the others. While Jennifer's network is very decentralized, and doesn't rely on any one node.

# data[].attributes.body
John.

In both the classical and contemporary definition of power, I believe the way that authority centres on him alone, gives him more ability to wield influence to all those around him. The diagram also shows that the line of that power is concentrated almost entirely on only him.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe John's network gives him more power than Jennifer's gives her. The main reason is that John has fewer connections and is likely to have more influence on them than Jennifer on her very numerous connections.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that John has more power, since his network is directly connected to him, whereas Jennifer's network has too many chaotic connections, which sometimes overlap with her. Thus, in Jennifer's case, the execution of power can be challenging and have obstacles, while in John's case, since there are less interactions between the network members and more direct contact, the power execution can be more straightforward and powerful.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe John as more power as,
- He plays a central role with his connections and is linked directly to them all.
- This will allow him to have a more direct influence on his network.
- Given the structure with all connections leading back to him directly, John appears to be recognised as someone with power by the others.

# data[].attributes.body
It's clear that John has more power as he is the center of connection and without him there will be difficulty to get other points connected.

# data[].attributes.body
John's network because with less interactions he arrives to the same result, thus, he has more power.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe John's network would give more power, given that the network converges with John at a central location, where the nodes are all connected in with them, suggesting they are a central player in this structure and would allow them to hold more power.

# data[].attributes.body
John seem to have more power within his network since he can influence directly most or them .

# data[].attributes.body
John's network gives him more power. Jennifer's connections can all influence each other, therefore negating her influence on them.

# data[].attributes.body
[example post]