# data[].attributes.body
Reflection of Comments:

Thank you for your feedback, Melissa. I changed the background to a more neutral color. Being colorblind, I often am not choosing the best color schemes for my initial setups within projects. However, I am still confused to what exactly you find confusing about the layout.

Overview: I am focusing on just the Boston T3 Initiative due to a lack of data at the other locations. I just placed the other locations on my Padlet, so that you may see the other locations and how the organization is lacking consistency with goals and expectations. As far as my personal overview of the organization, I did not include it intentionally. I did not want to have a lengthy text taking up space on the Padlet. Further, I wanted to have you make conclusions about the organization from my other materials and from my vocal narrative.

Key Questions: My 3rd Key Question is broad. In my evaluation plan, I do explain what the achievement gap is as reported by the school district and how T3 measures their progress on this program goal.

Data Collection Instrument: I definitely need to tweak my survey and decide what exactly I am attempting to find out from the participants input.

# data[].attributes.body
I was unable to edit your current comment section, so I created a new one.
I thought the layout was a little confusing. The background of your padlet was a little distracting overall.

Overview Comments:
Will you be focusing on all of these locations for your program evaluation? I know in your Evaluation matrix you mention because they are a private business it may be hard to get records from them; perhaps selecting one location for your evaluation could help that a bit, reaching out and forming a personal connection with someone on the staff at a location near you if possible.
I would have liked to have seen your own overview in addition to the overviews from their organization

Key Questions and Evaluation Matrix
Key Question 3 seems broad. "Closing the achievement gap" is a very tough thing to measure through a survey. How are you defining that? Could that question be more specific? Are they only going into schools that need to be moved from certain proficiency scores on a state test? Or something more than that? Further, this definition usually varies by state, so, that might be challenging to measure if you are using all of these locations.

Logic Model
My assumption from the logic model, from the outcomes, is that you are choosing the Boston location.

Data Collection Instrument
Your key question doesn't exactly align with your survey, the key question asks about school climate while the survey asks about collaboration climate. I think this might end up giving results that are skewed. Additionally,I think that to accurately measure an impact you would need an additional question regarding the change in climate of any kind you would need a question about the collaboration climate before and after the initiative. If this is the first in a series of surveys you could compare the results of the "after" or "during" and progress monitor how they have changed.

Thanks,

Melissa Porter Parks

# data[].attributes.headline
                                Intro to T3:

# data[].attributes.subject
                                Intro to T3:

# data[].attributes.body
About Teacher Turnaround Teams:

# data[].attributes.body
· To what degree is the T3 Initiative retaining top-performing teachers past the mandatory three year program obligation?

· How is the T3 Initiative increasing positive school culture?

· To what extend are the T3 Initiative schools closing the achievement gap with the district schools each year?

# data[].attributes.body
School Climate Teacher Survey (Excerpt of one survey)

# data[].attributes.headline
                                T3 Evaluation 

# data[].attributes.subject
                                T3 Evaluation 

# data[].attributes.body
Program Overview