# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

REFERENCES

1. 7
Collins, A.B., Heupel, M.R., and Motta, P.J., Residence and movement patterns of cow nose rays Rhinoptera bonasus within a south-west Florida estuary, J. Fish Biol., 2007, vol. 71, pp. 1159-1178.

Article Google Scholar

2. 16
Greenwood, A.K., Ardekani, R., McCann, S.R., et al., Genetic mapping of natural variation in schooling tendency in the threespine stickleback, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genet., 2015, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 761-769. doi 10.1534/g3.114.016519

Google Scholar

3. 22
Kajiura, S.M. and Tellman, S.L., Quantification of massive seasonal aggregations of blacktip sharks ( Carcharhinus limbatus) in southeast Florida, PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. e0150911. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0150911

4. 25
Klimley, A.P., Schooling in Sphyrna lewini, a species with low risk of predation: a non-egalitarian state, Z. Tierpsychol., 1985, vol. 70, pp. 297-319.

Article Google Scholar

5. 32
Lange, N.O., Development of Cuban and Don common roach Rutilus rutilus Heckeli (Nordmann) and Caspian roach Rutilus rutilus caspicus (Jakowlew), Tr. Inst. Morfol. Zhivotn., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960a, no. 25, pp. 47-98.

6. 49
Parzefall, J., Field observations in epigean and cave populations of the Mexican characid Astyanax mexicanus (Pisces, Characidae), Mém. Biospéol., 1983, vol. 10, pp. 171-176.

Google Scholar

7. 63
Soin, S.G., Kasumyan, A.O., and Pashchenko, N.I., Ecological and morphological analysis of the common minnow Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) (Cyprinidae), Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1981, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 695-710.

Google Scholar

8. 71
Wright, D., Rimmer, L.B., Pritchard, V.L., et al., Inter and intra-population variation in shoaling and boldness in the zebrafish ( Danio rerio), Naturwissenschaften, 2003, vol. 90, pp. 374-377.

9. 72
Wright, D., Nakamichi, R., Krause, J., and Butlin, R.K., QTL analysis of behavioral and morphological differentiation between wild and laboratory zebrafish ( Danio rerio), Behav. Genet., 2006, vol. 36, pp. 271-284.

PubMed Article Google Scholar

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are sincerely grateful to K.V. Kuzishchin (Moscow State University) for valuable comments on the MS.

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project nos. 14-14-01171-P (search and analysis of literature) and 14-50-00029 (preparation of MS).

Author information

Affiliations

1. Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

A. O. Kasumyan

2. Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow,, Russia

A. O. Kasumyan & D. S. Pavlov

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. O. Kasumyan.

About this article

Cite this article

Kasumyan, A.O., Pavlov, D.S. Evolution of Schooling Behavior in Fish. J. Ichthyol. 58, 670-678 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945218050090
Download citation
Keywords:

fish

schooling behavior

social behavior

school

origin

evolution

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Evolution of schooling behavior in fish is discussed. For the first time, schooling was formed in early Teleostei ca 200-220 Ma years BP. There are no strict data on the presence of this form of social behavior in older Craniata. It is supposed that the evolutionary path of schooling followed from asociality to protoschools and then to true equipotential schools.

# data[].attributes.body
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0032945218050090#:~:text=Evolution%20of%20schooling%20behavior%20in%20fish%20is%20discussed.,200%E2%80%93220%20Ma%20years%20BP.&text=The%20fish%20of%20many%20species,according%20to%20volume%20and%20abundance.

https://www.zooportraits.com/animals-social-behavior-group-living/

# data[].attributes.body
There are two main benefits for social behavior as a whole. The first is greater success rates when hunting prey. The second provides greater protection against predators

# data[].attributes.body
Evolution of schooling behavior in fish is discussed. For the first time, schooling was formed in early Teleostei ca 200–220 Ma years BP. There are no strict data on the presence of this form of social behavior in older Craniata. It is supposed that the evolutionary path of schooling followed from asociality to protoschools and then to true equipotential schools. The schooling behavior might disappear and appear again repeatedly and independently in different groups of teleosteans. Formation of schooling depended on Teleostei’s mode of life, first of all, on distribution to the pelagial, and it did not strictly depend on the evolutionary age or phylogenetic relationships of taxonomic groups or particular species. Schooling might be transformed into other types of social behavior. The scheme of evolution of the schooling behavior is suggested. -link.springer.com

# data[].attributes.body
Fish swim in schools to better protect themselves from predators, improve their foraging and swim more efficiently.