# data[].attributes.body
The watching inappropriate videos in a public library is definitely a situation that should be considered and maybe libraries should set a warning in front of their doors that they have the right to ask a person to remove themselves from the computer. Or ban the people who are caught watching that.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Cris's question, I think there are soo many cases that brought social change. Brown v. Board of education, Roe v. Wade, Gay marriage case. All these cases still have an impact on our politics today.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what everyone is saying. I think there will always be some form of discrimination no matter how evolved our society gets. I also think it depends on the region you're in, like Devan and Hannah said.

# data[].attributes.body
With YouTube and censored shows on TV, I feel like they should be uncensored because parents can set parental guidance and control what their kids watch.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that we need to minimize these loopholes because there are many times where these criminals are walking away free when that shouldn't be the case. However there should be certain things that allow a person to walk away vs. actually being charged

I don't believe that racism will just go away. Like it was said, in different parts of the states, the matter is treated differently. Here we don't see it as much because racism never really hit here, however down south
it's another story. I feel its all depending with a person growing up and their viewpoint

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that there are many loop holes that allow criminals to walk away free. I agree with Bo that there should be a way to override certain things.

# data[].attributes.body
Youtube at libraries should definetly be filtered. Kids walking around and being exposed to that is highly inappropriate. I agree with Justen as well, a library is a learning environment and the purpose isn't to be viewing inappropriate videos or images.

# data[].attributes.body
Miranda v. Arizona is a such a significant court case, given the changes it made to the current police system. I'm not sure how many more loopholes we have that would allow people like Miranda escape prosecution, now that Miranda rights have been incorporated into the arrest routine.

I love Alicia's question about affirmative action. Since we're seniors applying to (and getting accepted to) colleges right now, we're being put into situations similar to that of the UC Regents v. Bakke Supreme Court case. I think affirmative action is a hard issue, since having it and not having it may both lead to discrimination. If we have affirmative action, some minority groups or people could be included, but it may exclude others. Not having affirmative action would lead be vice versa, maybe the other ethnic groups will be left out.

# data[].attributes.body
If we "close the loopholes", civil liberties United States citizens have will be infringed. While yes, there are many circumstances that criminals get away with their crime because of small mistakes by the federal government (or police), they are not being charged by the federal government because they did not give these people their civil liberties. Especially in a time where police brutality is heavily debated, these loopholes would allow increased lax in following procedure.

# data[].attributes.body
I do believe that computers should be filtered but however i agree with Marty that it would become a political issue and people would say that it's infringing on their rights. It's an ethical vs political issue but in this case, it's a public place and there must be a certain level of protection because as we talked about with prior restraint before, there are kids that would be effected negatively.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Ashleys question, I believe there should most definitely should be different sections of public libraries where children and adults can go. Restricting the internet in a public place may violate the Constitution and the right to privacy, but in the childrens section in the library could be restricted like the school computers are.
I agree children shouldnt be able to walk by and see graphic, innapropriate things on the internet, maybe the adult section is more restricted?

# data[].attributes.body
We still need to have laws that protect discrimination.

The SC has done a good job at speaking the public´s voice.

That act that protects minorities against the federal government in when trying to vote, should have not been struck down because their are still racist people in the government.

# data[].attributes.body
I think these laws are in place so there is no discrimination with the law, if the government does not follow these rules I getting released is fair. I agree with Bo.

# data[].attributes.body
It would be hard to change content policy in libraries due to the fact that its public property and government law is in place (Where some undesirable content is legal)

# data[].attributes.body
Filtering the internet in the library would lead to filtering the books and other forms of media in the library

# data[].attributes.body
I think just because of a technicality they weren't read their rights doesn't mean there not guilty of the crime they committed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that since YouTube is part of a private company, they should have the choice of regulating their own website. Although, there should still be basic regulations such as inappropriate content but there should be the ability to do what they want with their filtering and regulating.

# data[].attributes.body
Rather than making a clause so people are let off for not getting their Miranda rights read to them, why don't we train our police officers the importance of reading the Miranda rights

# data[].attributes.body
To go off of something that Vanessa was saying about what/how do we want our kids to act and what Zoe is also saying, it makes me think of a famous quote by Kurt Cobain that talks about how the duty of youth is to challenge corruption. It's all about the evolvement of our world and it's always going to keep changing, there will always be issues and no amount of rules/regulations/policies and how our government works will fix that. This generation's children will face different issues then the next's will.

# data[].attributes.body
I think whether or not his rights were stated, if he admitted to it himself, it's fairly obvious that he is a criminal and should be imprisoned for it.

I honestly don't think racism will ever just disappear, honestly. It's how the world works, parents will raise their kids to believe in a certain way and there's no sure way to just eliminate all of it, even xhundred-thousand years in the future. There will always be hostility towards "inferior" (disadvantaged) minorities.

# data[].attributes.body
I completely agree with Jillian, and there should definitely be filters in public library computers. Although those computers are there for personal use, it is also in public and people should only be allowed to use them in a way that is appropriate for the PUBLIC.

# data[].attributes.body
I think there needs to be less loop holes, however, it is important for these certain rules and regulations that we follow to be here. It is a tough topic