# data[].attributes.body
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO ANSWER STUDY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS TOPIC.

http://goo.gl/forms/AAq3cNgnJU

CHECK ANSWERS AGAINST INFORMATION ON THIS SUCCESSION PLANNING PADLET PAGE.

# data[].attributes.headline
Responsibilities of Succession Planning 

# data[].attributes.subject
Responsibilities of Succession Planning 

# data[].attributes.body
The board is responsible for succession planning for the executive director position.

The executive director is responsible for ensuring a succession plan is in place for other key positions in the organisation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Challenges to effective succession planning 

# data[].attributes.subject
Challenges to effective succession planning 

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on the size of the organisation, some nonprofits have few positions that offer opportunities for advancement.

An employee who has inadequate training and/or development can result in that employee not being prepared for a promotion.

# data[].attributes.body
Ensures the organisation is prepared with a plan to support the service when the executive director, senior manager or key people leave. It offers a continuing supply of qualified and motivate employees, who are prepared to take over when key employees leave the organisation. It cuts the costs asscociated with recruiting external employees as well.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Succession Planning is essential: The Case of the Runaway Talent

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Succession Planning is fundamental to long-term organizational stability. Leaders must provide assurances to internal and external stakeholders that there is an organized plan for continuity in the quality and flow of the organization's programs and operations. In this cartoon, see how Sally Planwell, Director of HR, saves the day with effective talent management, succession planning and employee retention.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Analysis- develop a solid understanding of what challenges the company faces

2. Development- identifying internal and external components on who will be ready for promotion

3. Selection- internal candidates should be ready at this point to take over. Clear winner should be identified easily.

4. Transition- have a clear plan of the next 12 months on where the company wants to go. This includes metrics and measurements on key targets.

For more information

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Over the past two weeks, two iconic companies, Merrill Lynch and Citigroup , have seen their CEOs unexpectedly depart. Equally surprising is the fact that neither company has demonstrated that a strategic approach to succession planning was in place.

Because the board of directors has responsibility for governance, the development and execution of a thoughtful succession-planning process must receive its full consideration. Unfortunately, such efforts are too often underdeveloped, unevenly executed and sometimes simply ignored. When boards permit a happenstance approach to succession planning, they have effectively abdicated one of their most crucial responsibilities.

Our review of succession efforts reveals the four best practices that can be implemented at any company and can help ensure that directors have an effective succession-planning process in place. These practices protect the interests of board members, employees, shareholders and other constituents, and also give everyone confidence in the company's long-term prospects.
1. Analysis
The first practice involves developing a solid understanding of the most significant challenges the company and its industry are likely to face over the next four to six years, and the skills and experiences the chief executive will need to lead the company past those hurdles. Directors must fight the tendency to think the answer is to find a younger version of the incumbent CEO.

Only in the rarest cases will future challenges require the same skills that worked in the past. For example, GE's past three CEOs (Reg Jones, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt Jeff Immelt) are starkly different people. In leadership succession, GE has done a good job of looking "through the windshield" rather than "in the rear-view mirror" to understand the leadership skills required of the next CEO. Investing in a credible forecast about the future makes it possible to understand the skills and capabilities a CEO will need.
2. Development
The best practices in development are different for internal and external candidates. For internal candidates, development begins with the identification of a small number of people who could be made ready in two to four years. Though there is a strong bias for "ready now" candidates, directors must recognize that such individuals exist only in theory.

The odds that the "perfect" person finds his or her way to a leadership opportunity at just the "right" time are so improbable that planning for it is ludicrous. However, a great deal can be done in two to four years to develop an executive, whether it involves rotations in different functional areas, international assignments or something else. A caution regarding internal candidates: When succession planning is cavalier about timing, candidates are either too quick or too slow to develop; those ready too soon become targets for headhunters, while those not yet ready are of little use.

External candidates are usually identified with the help of an executive search firm. Normally, these executives lie beyond the company's reach in terms of development, but in a best-practices approach to succession planning, companies actually bring potential CEO successors in through other positions. This allows the company to make a strategic investment in the new executive's development, as the board not only increases its company's bench strength but also has a chance to explore the executive's likely effectiveness as CEO. Both ( Starbucks ) and John Chambers John Chambers ( Cisco ) ascended to CEO positions this way. The opportunity for the executive and the board to develop their relationship greatly reduces transition risk.
3. Selection
As the transition approaches, the internal candidates should be ready. The scanning for external candidates should be updated. The best selection practice involves inviting all internal candidates to give presentations to the board in which they describe their vision for the company's next five years. After a presentation and discussion, the likelihood is--if the development of internal talent has been successful--that a clear winner will be revealed. If none emerges, then it is time for the board to consider external candidates. The risk with external candidates is high--not only do they present an incomplete picture to directors, but the company is an incomplete picture to them.

The uncertainty runs both ways. Whenever risks are high, however, returns are also expected to be high. This means the board must see tremendous upside potential in an external successor, and it also means there is tremendous pressure on the individual selected for the job.
4. Transition
A best-practices transition focuses on both the on-boarding process and first 12 months of a new CEO's tenure. Internal and external successors experience on-boarding differently, but a critical presumption is that before the successor's first day, the board has made certain that he or she has begun to develop relationships with board members, had sufficient time with the outgoing CEO to complete appropriate hand-offs and has a sense of the areas that represent burning fires requiring immediate action. On-boarding itself refers to the process of getting up to speed on the job.

Again, internal and external successors will experience this differently, but the two most critical practices here are for the board and the successor to agree on a plan for the first year that includes measurable metrics and milestones and the active engagement of the entire leadership so as to be sure everyone is working from the same playbook. Finally, a coaching plan for the entire first year should be in place. Providing a coach offers a supportive and apolitical resource that, in the end, helps the successor continue to do the personal work he or she began when the company initiated the succession-development process.

Conclusion

Hand-offs from one leader to the next are tricky because of the politics and intrigue that surrounds them, the complex nature of the CEO position and the dynamic nature of companies. For that reason, they represent a time when the company is vulnerable. By crafting a thoughtful, strategic approach to succession, the board fully addresses its governance responsibilities and sets the new leader on a firm course toward future success.
Stephen A. Miles is managing partner in the Leadership Consulting Practice at Heidrick & Struggles. Nathan Bennett is professor of management at Georgia Tech.
Do you have an issue you're burning to write about for Forbes.com? Let us hear your suggestions by e-mailing us here.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Over the past two weeks, two iconic companies, Merrill Lynch and Citigroup , have seen their CEOs unexpectedly depart. Equally surprising is the fact that neither company has demonstrated that a strategic approach to succession planning was in place.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjSYiGT5ZJ0

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Download: http://info.profilesinternational.com/web/website-no-succession-plan--no-success/ No Succession Plan? No Success! is an eBook from Profiles International. Effective succession planning helps companies recruit superior employees and develop their knowledge, skills, and abilities to prepare them for promotion into more challenging roles. Also, subscribe to our YouTube channel to get the latest updates from Profiles International.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q4P5sFtuwk

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What is succession planning? - created at http://goanimate.com/

# data[].attributes.body
Succession planning ensures that if key people leave, an organisation can continue to fulfil its goals and carry out day to day operations without minimal disruptions