# data[].attributes.body
- Gender Equality Policy: clear understanding of whole team of what Gender Equality is and how it applies to WWP
- Fund raising: 2/3 pathways to help bring revenue in the future, presentations for fundations
- National  networks: onboarding and collaboration on lobbying for Grevio + accreditation + more contacts with members
Further the accreditation process - draft the accreditation model
- Fundraising Strategy revised and updated
- Expert meeting with Wave - Collaboration and joint projects
- Mapping coll wss and pp. A better understanding of critical issues
- Grevio workshops- Deconstructing a few case studies for more scaffolding and responding better to what members need.

# data[].attributes.body
- need support in the gender equality policy - different inputs, maybe also from a male point of view? how to approach it structurally and contents-related
- Fund raising: somebody passionate about this too discuss issues
Accreditation: onboarding members, developing something attainable, financial coverage in the future.
- creating consensus with members and with WAVE on the need of collaboration between PP and WSS
-Grevio workshop: maybe a consultation with members? Different model where we take the lead?

# data[].attributes.body
Input and exchange with Sandra on child protection and adolescent perpetrator and KCS.

# data[].attributes.body
-Gender Equality Policy. Do we really need this? What sense does it have for us?
- find fundraising opportunities, how do we get people to open their wallets? how to approach foundations
think about the special role of the board, since they have conflicting interests
- National networks: who should  we engage? Is it worth reaching out to all?
- how to include members in the accreditation process. How do we  obtain a 35% buy in?
- WAVE: how can we open channels of communication and develop joint projects?
- Mapping: what is happening when things go bad with our members and is there anything we can do?
- GREVIO workshop: how to be effective? How do we support members? How do we create a lobbying network?

# data[].attributes.body
How am I supposed to support to WWP EN Board in fundraising capacity? For the study visit for UN Women, who will relate with host and providers?

# data[].attributes.body
I have clear idea of my tasks, what is expected from me and related deadlines. Detailed and timely info functional to my tasks. More interaction with main responsible persons. Monthly reporting meeting every firts week to work on staff effort splitting among projects and WPs. Detail financial info in admin documents (e.g. date of payments). Clear information from staff on hours distribution among grants/projects in timesheets.

# data[].attributes.body
Financial and staff reporting done in time. Annual conference in persons, delivered with no stress and members satisfied.

# data[].attributes.body
- how to structure work efficiently and make sure nothing is forgotten
-  how to behave when people are not responding - difficulty of keeping everything in mind and afraid to forget something and if people don't respond the list keeps getting longer
- staff and people responsible for tasks be more attentive to admin and financial aspects and implications.
- clear role in process of fundraising support for the board

# data[].attributes.body
- support especially for certain tasks to be able to double check and discuss how to manage doubts.
- collaboration with team on various levels
- remember to take care of myself

# data[].attributes.body
All the bookkeeping and financial management of the organization done correctly and (hopefully) efficiently, improvement of work processes, support team in other areas as needed.

# data[].attributes.body
Shared decision on how many projects to target according to bids strategy / plan if any; Support members new to calls in applying / Further improve collaboration with members used to apply; Appointment of project related staff to be decided and contractualised; Campaign and press support for projects to be externalised

# data[].attributes.body
OG and project budget is correctly allocated and spent to maximise impact with justifiable and cost-effective decision making process; 4 – 5 Cerv applications have been submitted and 2 new projects granted to start by spring 2023; Diversify participation of Members in new applications and make both expert and non expert work together + how to involve non EU; All ongoing projects run smoothly and timely with high quality deliverables and in compliance with Grant Agreements; Dissemination of projects is integrated and harmonised with core OG comms plan; Relevant outputs of projects are developed with a long term view to feed WWP training and CB pool; Team are happy and able to work properly with the way tasks and effort have been / are planned

# data[].attributes.body
Strong coordination with team (clear task distribution and meetings to share process and emerging needs); Continuous financial monitoring and (re)planning of budget and tasks according to overall run of organisation; Regular relationship with partners (friendly negotiation and clear set of tools and guidelines); Integrated and harmonised comms plan of projects and OG

# data[].attributes.body
Dissemination plans for the projects starting in 2022

# data[].attributes.body
* Website: Figure out what actually needs improving & implement
* Campaign: How to make less stressful? How to make members more reliable?
* How to engage more members who don't speak English so well? How to build a more engaged membership?
* Webinar topics & speakers -> need to discuss with team
* How to get more feedback from audiences (website, newsletter, social)?
* How will other strategies interact comms strategy? How does communications fit into organisation?

# data[].attributes.body
* clear internal deadlines so I can plan dissemination activities
* more feedback & exchange
* take up space for communications needs
* AC: get lots of content & pictures
* figure out needs more clearly (haha)

# data[].attributes.body
Deliverables:
-Which internal deadline would be best for the deliverables, how much time in advance?
Impact:

-No deadline for the adaptation of Impact to youth violence or is it October too? (Task number 13 and 14); we promised its adaptation but not piloting or application, right?
WAVE
-When would it be the best moment for our members and for us to start the mapping of PP (WAVE)?

# data[].attributes.body
* Higher work satisfaction
* Figure out clearer target audience
* Set up clear evaluation/monitoring
* Improved press work skills & workflow
* Be less afraid to communicate needs and insecurities

# data[].attributes.body
Major needs have already been met - project reporting timelines and project deliverable

# data[].attributes.body
IMPACT:
-Discuss with the steering group on Impact about the possible adaptation format to youth violence;

-Coordinate with team members and the working group (or expert group)
Mapping PP (WAVE):
-To decide when will we start;

-Coordinate with team members and decide who wants to help with the interviews (if 5 of us are on board each would do around 13 interviews);

-To stablish dates for next meetings with WAVE;

-Make sure they kept this task in their Operating Grant and propose to write the final report collaboratively
Presentaitons:
-Coordinate with Alessandra and the team to make sure we reach the final number of conferences (task 36)

# data[].attributes.body
How to organize trainings in 2022 (tickets?). Internal working group on accreditation. How to promote it (linking with AC). How to use the most of regional mappings and reports that we are making? How to help eachother )having these kind of meetings from time to time?)

# data[].attributes.body
Establishing contacts with Ministry Officials, Child Protection Organisations and WSS. Hopefully establish a cooperation with the child protection organisation.

# data[].attributes.body
- More streamlined workflow (dissemination, monitoring and reporting)
- Focus on improving personal graphic design skills/other aspects of communications

# data[].attributes.body
To be proud of the model of accreditation that professionals recognize as a need and are willing to take part.
To have more quality trainings and trainers to connect with.
To make an impact in terms of survivor-centered perpetrator work in regions that we are working with.

# data[].attributes.body
Membership development:
- Some tasks are work areas of other team members, but are still relevant for membership development generally --> include or not? (avoiding overlap)

- Membership drive for Eastern Europe --> most non-represented countries from EE are non-EU members. From the rest we have high representation already. Should we just target the drive at "missing" European countries?

Annual conference:
- Team members' input on what to do differently this year
- How will health restrictions be put in practice, how will this influence the AC?
- Should we stream some sessions online?

Study visits:
- In-person and virtual: agree on timings
- Increase participants of in-person SV?
- Virtual study visit topic

Quality assurance:
- How we can ensure GDPR conformity and still make sure we can get all info we need?

# data[].attributes.body
-To have better exchange on quality outputs from different strands of work and how to integrate them
-  To have this kind of reflective sessions with the team

# data[].attributes.body
Quality assurance:
-Set of standardized tools for conducting pre-post evaluation

-Obtain meaningful results about the impact and transfer of knowledge of our activities for our members, and so gather information about the quality of our activities, and to

-Add a section on quality in our website to be fully transparent

Impact Toolkit:
-Currently 11 users (with ASAP 2.0.; 3 new users), one new user needed (in conversations with 4 programmes currently)

-New strategy to roll-out the Impact Toolkit; more focused on capacity building and supporting on getting funding (2 pilots this year)

-To make the use of the Impact Toolkit is more sustainable while still giving value to it

Cooperation with VSS (WAVE):
-Knowledge about critical aspects of PP and cooperation with VSS

Conference presentations (collaboration with P&P):
-March conference planned for the Centre of Law Studies in Catalonia, which coordinates prison and probation together with the Ministry + three presentations/abstract were sent for the ENGV conference

-Have a more clear idea of possible cooperation with prison and probation; start thinking about adapting the Impact Toolkit to this context (presentation at CEP?), reach an agreement with Catalan Prison and Probation to coordinate their evaluation (as a pilot to be extended to other countries)

Bids:
-Have a clear established methodology for mapping PP in different regions so that we can replicate it in other countries (next Irish bid for example?)

-Gather information on the quality of PP around Europe (mapping with WAVE cross-cuts with this aim)

# data[].attributes.body
Membership development:
- Team members sharing members’ needs as a continuous process
- Conversations to align membership, comm, and potentially other strategies

Reporting:
- Input for OAK application
- Discuss alternatives to OAK (3rd funding period in a row)

# data[].attributes.body
Membership development:
- Fill more gaps in EU representation among membership
- New MDS that adequately reflects the evolvement of vision for membership development (less quantity, more quality)
- Being more in touch directly with members

Annual conference:
- Have an AC that fully takes advantage of the in-person format, responding to all the things that members have been missing out on
- Organise it in a way that is as safe as possible for all, with precautions that allow people to feel as comfortable as possible meeting despite pandemic

Quality assurance:
- Have a standardized evaluation system in place
- Have clarity around how we can ensure GDPR conformity
- Better capacity to measure impact we have on members’ work

Reporting:
- New OAK funding