# data[].attributes.body
Group 2 (BSED-1A)

Salavante, Janrick
Garcia, Clarize
Javier, Maxine
Desuyo, Faye Allyson
Espino, Christian Angelo
Pantua, Sweet Diane
Mercado, Nicko
Berbes, Love Jean

# data[].attributes.body
Salavante, Janrick
Garcia, Clarize
Javier, Maxine
Desuyo, Faye Allyson
Espino, Christian Angelo
Pantua, Sweet Diane
Mercado, Nicko
Berbes, Love Jean

# data[].attributes.body
ATIENZA, Russel
BADILLO, Novea Kate B.
BITANGA, Christian Dale
CORREA, Jomarie
GENTILESO, Racquel
JAVIER, Jayson
MANANSALA, Ai-cie
PENETRANTE, Lenard Aries

# data[].attributes.body
Apelacio, Jenard
Delos Santos, Carol
Llanita, Jomari
Mendoza, Nicole
Monsod, Alycka Mhae
Nicolas, Daphne Nicole

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 (BSED - 1A)
Adriano, Mark Clayton I.
Amoma, Joshua S.
Bautista, Aries J.
Coronel, Jay Joseph
Francisco, Samuel
Oblianda, Janna May
Rimandiman, Merel-Ann

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 (BSED - 1A)
Adriano, Mark Clayton I.
Amoma, Joshua S.
Bautista, Aries J.
Coronel, Jay Joseph
Francisco, Samuel
Oblianda, Janna May
Rimandiman, Merel-Ann

# data[].attributes.body
Angeles, Juvielyn
Carpio, Victorina
Flores, Ericka May
Jacob, Maria Christina
Lupango, Rachel Grace O.
Manahan, Fionna Marrin
Palileo, Abegail
Santos, Marycris

# data[].attributes.body
Group 6
Agulto, Jay Ann
Angeles, John Kyle
Fajardo, Justine Josh
Ocampo, Joymee
Ramos, Aloha
Tungol, Mhay Ann
Ventura, Angelo

# data[].attributes.body
Russel Atienza
Racquel Gentileso
Novea Kate Badillo
Lenard Aries Penetrante
Jayson Javier
Christian Dale Bitanga
Jomarie Castro Correa
Ai-cie Manansala

Have a happy reading💙
Thank you

# data[].attributes.body
Agulto, Jay Ann
Angeles, John Kyle
Fajardo, Justine Josh
Ocampo, Joymee
Ramos, Aloha
Tungol, Mhay Ann
Ventura, Angelo

# data[].attributes.body
Apelacio, Jenard
Delos Santos, Carol
Llanita, Jomari
Mendoza, Nicole
Monsod, Alycka Mhae
Nicolas, Daphne Nicole

# data[].attributes.body
As you critique the outputs of other groups, you need to decide if their conclusions are valid or acceptable based on the quality of their claim and how well they are able to support their ideas. In other words, you need to determine if their argument is convincing or not. One way to determine if their argument is convincing is to ask them some of the following questions:

•       How did you analyze or interpret your data? Why did you decide to do it that way?

•       How do you know that your analysis of the data is free from errors?

•       Why does your evidence support your claim?

•       Why did you decide to use that evidence? Why is your evidence important?

•       How does your justification of the evidence f t with accepted scientific ideas?

•       What are some of the other claims your group discussed before agreeing on your claim, and why did you reject them?

The goal of the argumentation is not to convince others that your argument is the best one; rather, the goal is to identify errors or instances of faulty reasoning in the arguments, so these mistakes can be fixed. You will therefore need to evaluate the content of the claim, the quality of the evidence used to support the claim, and the strength of the reasoning included in each argument that you see.