# data[].attributes.body
People are aloud to participate in any religion like a holiday if they believe in it. Which means they can wear what their religion attire is.

# data[].attributes.body
but then again that person that has an opinion of who they want represent and working for that company so that person also have there opinion but im not saying its right

# data[].attributes.body
No because it is a private company and it happened to have a dress code that she couldn't follow

# data[].attributes.body
I think Abercrombie's decision about her being apart of the job was reasonable. I say this because with the company basically having a "dress code", she should respect the companies ruling about appropriate attire for the job and try to find another one if she can't respect the ruling of Abercrombie.

# data[].attributes.body
Abercrombie, as a private company, should have the option on whether or not they hire someone no matter the issue. Your religion should not get in the way of the rules at an establishment, especially when there are other fashion companies of interest that you could easily find otherwise to acquire a job to provide money for your family.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that it is the destion of the  store and if the copany did not want to hire her they should not have to we should  not bend the rules for religus popruses or mabey for somthing minor like work place environment but it was not the environ ment that was the proplum it was the  the fact that she was wearing the wrong clothing if i went in to a military base wanting to join the army but i was were the wrong clothes and would not change them  so they would not exsept me is that desrimination,no there are dress codes for a reson and there could be a person who claims a religon just to were what they want if america becomes so flexible and lets people do whatever we will be looked down on by other countrys looking weeek and open for attack

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I think they did because they did not give her the job because of her religion attire, I don't think that was right for them to do. Its her religion and she has the right to wear her religion attire if she pleases. What they did was wrong and i'm glad she made a complaint about them and got sent to court for their mistake. People should have the right to wear the clothes that they need or choose to wear for their religion.

# data[].attributes.body
I do believe that as a private company Abercrombie should have the right to have their own dress code and that her religion should not be able to get in the way of the establishment's dress code.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion Abercrombie did violate Samantha Elauf's rights because it is her religion and her application should not have been turned down just because of the hijab. Its a part of who she is, and she  should not be judged  or be turned down because its the 1st amendment.
Just because its not apart  of their dress code does not mean a thing because then they are having her break her religion.

# data[].attributes.body
The girl is right. she should be able to work there even tho her head scarf conflicted with the dress code because it is apart of her religion

# data[].attributes.body
No her right's were not violated, because they never spoke of her religion. If you look in the article, they never said anything about Islam, they just said she couldn't wear the head dress because it was out of dress code. She could have looked at the dress code before she applied for that job. Also she can find another job where her head dress is allowed for workers.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes and no i think yes they could have found her some type of job there but i also don't think they were discriminating against her they had a dress code before she decided to aply for the job. I dont think that if we went to there country we could just go about our daily lives and get any job we wanted because i'm sure they require you to be covered up and wearing a hjaba so you ether half to adjust to their life style just a little bit or find a different job we shouldnt have to bend over backwards for every little thing.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion Samantha Elauf's rights were not violated. If Ambercrombie had a strict dress code that didn't allow anything to be worn on the head then it must be followed. If Samantha wants a job where she could wear her hijab she needs to read the dress code before applying for the job.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion it's a yes and no kinda thing. Yes they did because that's her rights, freedom of religion. No because she could've just not made it a big deal and just left it alone.

# data[].attributes.body
i think it was unfair that they wouldnt hire her just because she wore the head scarf i understand that it was out of dress code but its also apart of her religion

# data[].attributes.body
yes because if ur not gonna treat someone the same even if she had a hajaba on doesnt mean they should treat them different

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Samantha's religious rights were in fact violated. The reason was because if the only reason she didn't get job was because she wore her hijab, and was qualified in every other way, that is discrimination in my eyes.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think that Abercrombie violated Samantha Elauf's rights. Samantha did not explain to them why she were  the black head scarf on her head. I think that Samantha had taken her not getting the job in a wrong way or maybe she wanted to get money out of this taking it to court saying they did not hire her because of her religion. Just because they did not hire her does not mean that they didn't do it because of her religion like maybe Abercrombie had too many people working or maybe they were just looking for the right person before they started hiring others.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because Abercrombie didn't say anything about her religion and its their dress code they don't want their workers wearing hats.