# data[].attributes.headline
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist and compare it with your own summaries

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyze this student sample by using the given checklist and compare it with your own summaries

# data[].attributes.body
Checklist for summarising:

I have carefully analysed the given text ·
I have taken notes of the main points and key arguments ·       I have written a summary of the major arguments in my own words. ·
I have organised the arguments in a coherent and logical manner ·
I have used the appropriate reporting verbs and phrases that indicate the writer’s attitude towards the topic ·        I have acknowledged the author and the text when necessary

In the article entitled "Sustainability, Intergenerational Social Equity, and the Socially Responsible Organization" Stazyk, Moldavanova, and Frederickson (2014) claim that governments, organizations and socities must be aware of their responsibilities according to which we should preserve our planet for the coming generation.First the writers define environmental, economic and social sustainability. They stress that protection of the natural resources are important for our survival. Moreover, the writers defend humans should pass the world in a livable way to the next generations. They also mention that economic sustainability is significant and present two different views. The first view stresses that citizens should be responsible for taking action and the other view argues that governments should be protecting our resources and creating jobs for their citizens. They carry on with the social sustainability and claim that people should not be self-centred but they should respect the rights of the future generations to enjoy world resources. The writers conclude by arguing that individuals and states should take the necessary steps to use world resources carefully for the benefit of future generations.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity?” , Stazyk and Moldovanova and Frederickson (2014) discuss the definition of sustainability and how much people are in need to enhance their prospective of it nowadays for the future upcoming generations so they can meet their own needs. In other words, people should use natural resources carefully so that health and human survival continues. The writers first suggestion is to treat sustainability as a concept that has to do with equality across generations and sharing the natural resources is a must. Following this, the authors talked about the economic sustainability and how the government is the one who's responsible for environmental assets regulating since its public good and to protect the future interests against the effects of irrational short term preferences to meet present needs. the authors also emphasizes that every human being should be treated equally. then he states that the need of people nowadays and Especially natural resources will be limited to keep some to the future generations whereas the future generation will rest on those same limited resources that means either meanwhile or in future will be facing lack of natural resources which seems improbable. he They mentioned that the moral and ethical principles play a major role to inform our responsibilities to future generations. The authors concludes by stating that we should seek to adopt and implement policies that support intergenerational fairness.

Dear Mohamed,
Thank you for the task. Good job, but at some instances you can express ideas in a concise manner.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.headline
The guy with a black tshirt. -Alp Erkal 

 
    

# data[].attributes.subject
The guy with a black tshirt. -Alp Erkal 

 
    

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Sustainability and intergenerational Social Equity”,by Stazyk,Malsovanova and Frederickson (2014)
The authors states about that the environmental problems that could occur in the future for the future generations. Many of the environmental issues could be significantly important, he  they states many things and also talks about how Sustainable ility development have been neglected and reflected to the people. He supports the idea of saving the world for the future generations because, he mentions about the future needs of the future generations. W which he strongly supports his idea by giving the quote,
''Sustainability claims that environmental and natural resources must be shared with future generations, because natural resources are a common heritage of mankind to which every generation should have the same right of access (Asheim, Buchholz, & Tungodden, 1999)'' (at this stage of summarizing you cannot directly quote ideas, you need to paraphrase ideas - rewrite in your own words!) The authors provides this example, to prove the people stress that mankind should have the right to get the same food, water, livable resources like the centuries ago people did. He talks (use a stronger reporting verb) about the usage of these harmful unfriendly environmental hateful acts, that would not be helpful to those that will carry on the humanity. He also believes that, we are so ignorant and should take actions on sustainable development, about those toxic wastes, air pollutions, and etc.

In the end, people should be more carefully to the planet in order to save the future generations needs. Sustainable development should be primarily  focused by the governments and The World.

Dear Alp,

Thank you for the visual:) and the task. You have the main argument and supporting points, but you need to use linkers, put some of the details. You need to work on the organization.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity” , Stazyk, Maldovanova, Frederickson (2014) discuss three pillars of sustainability is discussed. The best method for sorting out our obligations to present and future generations rests in treating sustainability with equity across generations. Also we can understand in this context that sustainability claims that environmental and natural resources must be shared with future generations. And if we say something about economic sustainability and intergenerational fairness, however, Brätland (2006) (in summaries focus on the ideas rather than citing from outside resources) finds this transfer of property to a government authority unethical and argues that this cannot be justified as a moral obligation. Instead, he argues that private ownership is the only way to ensure resources are managed ethically. Ownership imposes responsibilities on the property owner. Property owners are to take precautionary measures against natural resource abuse and pollution (focus on the main point here rather than going into the details of the borrowed idea. State who should be responsible for the economic sustainability?). About social sustainability, a well-known theory, the tragedy of the commons, focuses on this issue and arises from the self-interested behavior of individuals who use a common pool of limited resources; in such cases, resources are scarce and each individual tries to maximize his or her benefit, eventually leading to the complete consumption of common resources (Hardin, 1968) (do not cite in summaries, simply focus on the idea). Although individuals are aware of the fact that they will not benefit from exhausting[5] common resources in the long-term, their collaboration is still impossible as their short-term interests gain priority. Consequently, seeking overarching moral or ethical principles to inform our responsibilities to future generations is what this text's purpose. At the same time, we can finally recognize that we are ignorant of the distant future (paraphrase, do not get chunks from the original) and can only imagine a little ahead. Still, we must act on what we know, even at the risk of mistakes.
Dear Beril,
Thank you for the summary. You have the main point and supporting ideas, but in summaries do not go into too much detail or borrow ideas. Please go over the supporting ideas and try to state them in a concise manner and check if there are repetitions.

Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity” , Stazyk, Maldovanova, Frederickson (2014) discuss there significant things.These are how economy, environment and society affect intergenerational fairness. The author suggest us that people should behave consciously and should NOT consume future resources. If people consume without thinking about the future generations, they inform that they cannot have equal rights and resources.

Dear Sena,

You have the main argument, but the supporting points are missing. Please complete your summary and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
İn “Sustainibility and İntergenerational Social Equity” , by Satazyk,Maldovanova and Frederickson (2014) disscusses three major points of sustainibility.Enviroment,economy and social equity.The ...

To whom it may concern,

To write better summaries, you need to practice. Please complete your summary and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “ Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity “ by Stazyk , Maldovanova and Frederickson (2014) mentions the important parts of sustainability which are environment , economy and society .

Dear Mehmet,

To write better summaries, you need to practice. Please complete your summary and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “ Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity”, by Stazyk, Moldovanova, Frederickson (2014), the writers analyse the association between sustainability and intergenerational fairness which has three prime context. These three components are overarching environmental, social and economic equity. The writers support that the current generations have a moral obligation to future generations because every human being must have the equal rights. Moreover, they state that sustainability addresses the universal sense of belonging and emphasizes shared values of humanity. (From now on, you mention the supporting points so use linkers to guide the readers) About the enviromental sustainability, the writers highlighted that sustainability is one of the most urgent issues in environmental policy because of the depletion of natural resources. They believe that environmental and natural resources must be shared with future generations. They also mention that the resources are a commean heritage of mankind, in other words, every generation should have the same right. They compare two models of economic sustainability. One of them states that it’s the government’s responsibility to protect future interests. On the contrary, the other model advocates that private ownership is the only way to ensure resources. In social sustainability they mention that it is the ability of future generations to maintain a healthy community. The writers conclude by stating that they hope at least some people recognize that they are ignorant about the usage of resources. They believe that once a solution is discovered, it may cause some important progress.

Dear İrem,

Good job, but make sure you guide the readers with the use of linkers.

Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
in "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity", by  Stazyk,Malsovanova and Frederickson (2014) debate that sustainality of economy, society and environmental equity for the next generations

Dear Mehmet,

To write better summaries, you need to practice. Please complete your summary and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article entitled "Sustainability and intergenerational Social Equity" by Stazyk,Malsovanova and Frederickson (2014),the authors states that there are three essential points about sustainability.These points are about environmental,economic and social sustainability.About environmental sustainability,.About environmental sustainability, writers believes equality between generations, so that they emphasizes how important to use resources adequate and properly for  future generations.About Economic sustainability, writer thinks that government should provide sustainability to people and maintain the current economic policy. Social sustainability described as  a system which people can maintain their life with a good relationships but in that case they need bases requarement (check spelling here) such as water.Moreover,writer comes to the first sustainability way 'environmental sustainability'.Therefore,social sustainability depends on natural resources.
To be clear,people need social live for living but without natural resources it is they are
not likely to have healty community.

Dear Nehir,
Thank you for the task. You have the supporting ideas, but the main argument is missing You also need  linkers so that the readers can follow the ideas you present.
Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity” Stazyk, Moldovanova and Frederickson (2014) mention sustainability and the connection of intergenerational fairness. According to the authors, sustainability can be seen as a form of intergenerational fairness which includes environmental, economic and social pillars (the main argument is missing you need to make clear what intergenerational sustainability means?. The article describes that environmental sustainability is standing for preventing the depletion of natural resources and environmental deterioration, also economic sustainability  means protecting resources while producing products, and finally social sustainability states not to be greedy and just focuses sharing the resources with a well-known theory “the tragedy of the commons”. The writers believe that sustainability should be considered as intergenerational social equity. In addition, all the resources of the world we live in should be distributed equally to past, present and future generations. The authors conclude by convincing us to be obliged in order to adopt and support  intergenerational fairness.

Dear Sena,

Thank you for the task. You have all the supporting ideas, but you need to use linkers to guide the readers.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity” , by Stazyk, Moldovanova and Rederickson (2014), argue about Sustainability and its three pillars. The authors suggest that we should be more informed about usage of resources otherwise we may face problems in terms of policy and practic se. Briefly if we need to explain the pillars of sustainability, economic sustainability means protecting our resources, us-workers- and our jobs; environmental sustainability means sharing our resources in equity with the future generations; social sustainability means maintaining a healthy community even in the future in terms of resources. The authors also try to convince us about fairness among the generations. For instance, “the tragedy of the commons” (p.3) is an evidence explaining the relations between self interested behaviour and exhausting common resources. The authors aim to make us reach a consensus to support intergenerational fairness (you need to explain what intergenerational equity means?).

Dear Aysara,

Thank you for the task. You have some of the supporting points, but you need to use linkers so that the readers can follow the presented ideas much better. You need to be clear with the main argument and explain what intergenerational equity means.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
İn “Sustainibility and İntergenerational Social Equity” , by Satazyk,Maldovanova and Frederickson (2014) disscusses three major points of sustainability: environment, economy and social equity.They all believe that we all should behave consciously and think twice while consuming.As we are not the last generation living on earth.

Dear Zeynep,
You have a clear first sentence and the main argument. You need to work on the supporting ideas, finish your summary and get feedback.

Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
in "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity", Stazyk, Moldovona and Frederickson (2014) discusses about how economy, society and environmental aeffects e affects intergenerational fairness. Intergenerational fairness is having equal rights, resources and living standards among future, past and present generations and they are try to warn people about what happens if they behave like there is no tomorrow and giving suggestions about how can people provide intergenerational equity. Sustainability has three pillars ; Economic, Social and Environmental. Economic pillar means protecting our resources when producing products. Social pillar represents that people should not be greedy and take all resources for themselves, they need to share and they should protect their workers and their jobs. And finally Environmental pillar stands for equity between past, present and future generations resources. Authors emphasizes that all generations haves equal rights to have resources and living standards. Mentioning about equity across generations by intergenerational fairness. In the conclusion, authors try to outline Sustainability and Intergenerational fairness and give solutions for people's problem what they need to fix because if they do not, for the next generations there will be no world that people have right now.

Dear Zeynep,

You have mentioned the main argument and supporting points correctly, but you need to refer to the author and use linkers so that the readers can follow the ideas you presented much better.

Thank you,
MET

# data[].attributes.headline
           Gizem Tepecik                        In the article "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity" by Stazky, Moldovana and Frederickson (2014), they argue about What is the Sustainability,and they try to explain it with three main components. Sustainability is maintaining resources for future generations because to continue of the world existence. That is why, authors mention sustainability  as a form of equity. According to the authors, people who live in the world at different times must be equal since everybody has same rights (this is the main argument). Secondly, the authors mention  sustainability by view of environmental (grammar is problematic and this is the first supporting idea so it is better to start with "first". The authors express that our environment was dropped enough resources (check grammar here as the meaning is not clear) for whole people and people should not overuse them because with this overuse, the world's balance is changing and for the future generations this event is not fair. Thirdly, economic sustainability is very crucial because it creates societies' structures. That is why, according to the authors, people have to continue "environmental assest" (who should be responsible according to the authors?).Finally, the last component of sustainability is  social sustainability . There must be limits people themselves while having something because for a fair world everybody should consume enough resources for themselves not too much. In conclusion, authors believe that people must be more aware of thedangers of consumerist world and they suggest that people should imply these main components to have more beautiful world. 

# data[].attributes.subject
           Gizem Tepecik                        In the article "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity" by Stazky, Moldovana and Frederickson (2014), they argue about What is the Sustainability,and they try to explain it with three main components. Sustainability is maintaining resources for future generations because to continue of the world existence. That is why, authors mention sustainability  as a form of equity. According to the authors, people who live in the world at different times must be equal since everybody has same rights (this is the main argument). Secondly, the authors mention  sustainability by view of environmental (grammar is problematic and this is the first supporting idea so it is better to start with "first". The authors express that our environment was dropped enough resources (check grammar here as the meaning is not clear) for whole people and people should not overuse them because with this overuse, the world's balance is changing and for the future generations this event is not fair. Thirdly, economic sustainability is very crucial because it creates societies' structures. That is why, according to the authors, people have to continue "environmental assest" (who should be responsible according to the authors?).Finally, the last component of sustainability is  social sustainability . There must be limits people themselves while having something because for a fair world everybody should consume enough resources for themselves not too much. In conclusion, authors believe that people must be more aware of thedangers of consumerist world and they suggest that people should imply these main components to have more beautiful world. 

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Gizem,
Thank you for the summary. You have the main argument and supporting points, but you need exclude some of the details and check if some sentences repeat the same idea.
Thank you,
MET