# data[].attributes.headline
Developing a clear communication plan is critical to our success.  Building leaders are integral to the process as well. No delegating this one!

# data[].attributes.subject
Developing a clear communication plan is critical to our success.  Building leaders are integral to the process as well. No delegating this one!

# data[].attributes.body
I think that one of the biggest traps that we can fall into when rolling out PL is that people just resign themselves to saying, "This is something we already do and are simply putting a new label on it." If we fall into that trap then people won't continue to grow and evolve professionally. Best practices are still best practices, but the strategies and methodology continue to evolve with our kids.

# data[].attributes.body
This was an important article to read in this process as being proactive when the challenges come about will help make a successful implementation in the district.

# data[].attributes.body
I read the 6 risks article and was struck by how clearly the author believes in clarity of purpose and communication with all stakeholders. It made me think about how developing a clear communication plan will help the launch of PL. This would be helpful not just for consistent messaging to staff, but as a useful exercise to assure we all have a common understanding of the why and the how related to PL.

# data[].attributes.body
Each of the videos I watched showcased the impact that this shift can have on traditionally struggling schools. It also highlighted the need for staff to understand that this is not about the devices, it's about changing the operational philosophy of a system. The technology is just the accelerator and facilitator of this.

# data[].attributes.headline
How does a district get stakeholder involvement and communicate clear goals and benchmarks for progress without having a clear idea of what the individual classrooms will look like?

# data[].attributes.subject
How does a district get stakeholder involvement and communicate clear goals and benchmarks for progress without having a clear idea of what the individual classrooms will look like?

# data[].attributes.body
Different teachers with different strengths will have different approaches to PL that need to be shared in a way that makes sense for students, parents and administrators

# data[].attributes.body
From a teaching perspective, I feel that sound classroom management is a must in order for this style to be effective.

# data[].attributes.headline
As one student stated, adding digital content is "setting the bar higher." It's great for students to realize and maximize their learning to their fullest potential. 

# data[].attributes.subject
As one student stated, adding digital content is "setting the bar higher." It's great for students to realize and maximize their learning to their fullest potential. 

# data[].attributes.body
Not only, will the implementation of PL within our district help the students succeed but it will also allow the teachers to be more successful.
I particularly liked the "6 Risks to Avoid" which will help set us up for continued success!

# data[].attributes.headline
after viewing the videos it is becoming more clear that personalized learning will not always, nor should it, look the same for each classroom, teacher, student or school. Many variables come into play such as poverty levels, size of schools/districts, willingness to commit or implement change. It seems that much more of the resistance comes from the adults, and students seem excited and very willing to jump right in. It seems more reflective of the way they already approach the world. It seems important to ensure that the correct utilization of technology and programs is investigated to ensure the best success for PL to move forward effectively. 

# data[].attributes.subject
after viewing the videos it is becoming more clear that personalized learning will not always, nor should it, look the same for each classroom, teacher, student or school. Many variables come into play such as poverty levels, size of schools/districts, willingness to commit or implement change. It seems that much more of the resistance comes from the adults, and students seem excited and very willing to jump right in. It seems more reflective of the way they already approach the world. It seems important to ensure that the correct utilization of technology and programs is investigated to ensure the best success for PL to move forward effectively. 

# data[].attributes.body
I watched the SCSD video and read the article on the risks. My question is, what does PL look like without clearly articulated curriculum framework? Some smaller districts do not have a fully developed curriculum each grade level and subject area. I think Ed Elements has done a good job building the case and empowering districts to develop mission/vision statements and have been clear about successful rollouts.

# data[].attributes.headline
How do we get buy-in from teachers and administration but at the same time make sure people truly understand PL? There are a lot of misconceptions that are coming to the surface around PL. Some think they are already doing it, some think it is throwing their kids in front of a computer, some think it is the end all, be all of engagement and is the magical mystery cure to low test scores and misbehavior in classrooms. 

# data[].attributes.subject
How do we get buy-in from teachers and administration but at the same time make sure people truly understand PL? There are a lot of misconceptions that are coming to the surface around PL. Some think they are already doing it, some think it is throwing their kids in front of a computer, some think it is the end all, be all of engagement and is the magical mystery cure to low test scores and misbehavior in classrooms. 

# data[].attributes.body
Resource I looked at were:

the video from Fulton county schools about getting digital content right

the Yuma school district- helping teachers succeed video.

Blog post on 6 risks to avoid, part 1 & 2

Questions: How do you balance a secondary setting where some teachers are rolling out the personalized learning initiatives and other teachers are not ready to do that yet? How do we prepare students to go from one classroom where learning has been personalized, to transition next period to a teacher that hasn’t embraced those initiatives yet? It seems like a we need to prepare students for this uneven roll out as much as we need to prepare teachers who may be early adopters and those who are not.

# data[].attributes.body
Training and communication must be a priority.  District team should meet, review every one of these risks, and ensure they are addressed prior to implementation.

# data[].attributes.headline
The idea of PL should encompass the growth mindset.  Hitting milestones as we learn and grow as educators will be essential to a culture shift in pedagogy.

# data[].attributes.subject
The idea of PL should encompass the growth mindset.  Hitting milestones as we learn and grow as educators will be essential to a culture shift in pedagogy.

# data[].attributes.body
I am most concerned about providing a clear rationale, building capacity, and communicating effectively with all stakeholders.  How do we build a communications plan and follow through to be sure everyone is receiving the same message?

# data[].attributes.headline
As a teacher, the knowledge that PL looks vastly different in each classroom is enlightening.  We need to be pushed to try innovative ideas, held accountable for follow through but also have the time and parameters that encourage the change.

# data[].attributes.subject
As a teacher, the knowledge that PL looks vastly different in each classroom is enlightening.  We need to be pushed to try innovative ideas, held accountable for follow through but also have the time and parameters that encourage the change.

# data[].attributes.body
I am nervous about getting buy in from teachers of students with Educational and Behavioral disabilities. How can we get these teachers to buy in to the benefits of PL?

# data[].attributes.body
Regionally implementing PL in CTE is a unique challenge because there are very few models or schools to reference. An exciting and daunting journey.

# data[].attributes.body
The amount of collaboration with one another is going to be essential as we roll out PL!  Our peeps are going to need to be in it, to win it!

# data[].attributes.body
How do we get buy in from teachers that are not involved in the full Ed. Elements training that we are going through?

# data[].attributes.body
These are all such good "warnings," and I can imagine all that could go wrong if we aren't slow and careful. I'm thinking about how each building in the
District is in a different place, and I'm wondering about how to manage both consistency & personalizing in our approach to implementation.

The piece I continue to be most apprehensive about is parent buy-in. We often find that when education looks "different" than how adults experienced it, the push-back is strong. The proactive and "convincing' explanation about the WHY for PL will be important for parents.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is so crucial to stress that PL will look different in each classroom and it is OK to have different idealizations based on student needs, teaching style and comfort level

# data[].attributes.body
Communication and a plan for ensuring that all stakeholders are continuously informed seems very important. I can see that it will likely be a very big challenge to maintain if there is no plan. I also think that we need a greater focus in our building to ensure that there will be models for instructors to draw from as they work to implement PL in their classrooms.

# data[].attributes.body
I viewed two videos about the implementation of PLC in Fulton County and Syracuse City Schools. Both communities seem to have embraced and been pleased with PLC in their schools.
I also read the two "6 Risks" articles. I think some of our greatest hurdles will be in deciding where/who receives the technology first and beyond, what the technology will be, and for me most importantly the training of all of our staff in how to use PLC in the classroom effectively. It will do our school community little good to have all of thiw technology and not use it to its full capacity for student success and achievement.

# data[].attributes.body
So far, I have explored the article "6 Risks to Avoid When Implementing Personalized Learning". Risk #4 really struck me, not because I think there is a "wrong" school in my district to begin implementing personalized learning, but because I think it is important to remember each school in the district should personalize its roll-out of personalized learning.

One question that I have:
When implementing PL in each building, how will each building communicate to the others?

# data[].attributes.body
The 6 Risks articles are a quick, realistic, and clear launching point for all the "what ifs" I have been thinking. A few of the most prominent thoughts/feelings that stuck with me include clear messaging, realistic timeline, and identifying clear criteria for success. Messaging should come from within the building and not solely from an outside vendor. In order to have ultimate "buy in" from teachers the message should be presented from a peer and trusted ally. Setting a clear timeline for stakeholders is also a key element to successful roll out of PL. It is not always clear how long, what steps need to be taken, or what completion will look like to all stakeholders involved. Clearly communicating this in non educational jargon is key to building community understanding and participation. Sometimes we can get so into the "work" of projects that we forget that we are working towards a goal. This goal needs to be identified and clearly defined so that all involved know when/how success is reached. Is it a date?...a score?...a specific procedure?...or is it ongoing with check points along the way? This all needs to be clearly communicated as well as the why. Why is this better or more effective. Why is this how students should be learning vs. ways of the past.