# data[].attributes.body
I think that i t is biased because he talked about all of the jobs and the econemy.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author didden't show bias, I think this because he never showed his thinking without a reason or answer that would be provided to prove his thaught's.

# data[].attributes.body
i think the author is biased.
the reason why i think that the author is biased is because:the only thing that the author was talking about the economy and jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
y i think that the author is biased is because:the only thing that the author was talking about the economy and jobs.
 

Add comment
grantt
grantt
I think the author didden't show bias, I think this because he never showed his thinking without a reason or answer that would be provided to prove his thaught's. 

# data[].attributes.body
e any thoughts too how that "big swamp" being destroyed would effect the ecosystem.He is not thinking about the cons, just the positive outcomes,  which shows he is wholly in favor of the new airport being built. Not seeing the negative side is NOT a smart business plan, especially when concerning some part of the ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author is biased because all he talks about is where the preferred site for the airport is and how much the business and the economy will increase in the next few years.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think the author is biased because the author thinks a new air port should be built, he did not include notes on the swamp being left alone and all of the creatures that rely on the swamp, because they had said it was a " big swamp" and that would mean a biger population would be destroyed. if he did not include anything about that, he musn't of cared that much, therefore leaving nothing else but the author wanting to place an airport in

# data[].attributes.subject
i think the author is biased because the author thinks a new air port should be built, he did not include notes on the swamp being left alone and all of the creatures that rely on the swamp, because they had said it was a " big swamp" and that would mean a biger population would be destroyed. if he did not include anything about that, he musn't of cared that much, therefore leaving nothing else but the author wanting to place an airport in

# data[].attributes.body
airports in the area will soon have more business than they can handle." This

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is favors the positive affects but he does tell some negative affects.Like when the text states that other major airports in that area will get more business then they could handle.That is good that they have more business but if there is to much business to handle it would be negative.

# data[].attributes.body
the author wants the airport built because the article seid , more business then the oter airports can handle

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased that we should have an airport in Morris county and some of his facts were thousands of new jobs will open, the airport would have on stores, restaurants and hotels located near and he said no negative facts In the article.

# data[].attributes.body
in the article I think that the author is biased because he is highlighting all of the pros instead of the cons of what will happen when they build the airport instead of if they build the airport for example the article says "thousands of new jobs will open up when building begins"

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author wants people to build a new airport in New York-New Jersey because the author said that it "will satisfy the growing need for more air travel services in the region" the author also said " it's nothing but a big swamp now, but it will be very useful to a lot of people once the airport gets underway." the author also said " that the other major airports in the area will soon have more business then they can handle

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased because he states in pharagraph three that "our business

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased because is only supporting on building a airport he is writing:
1) "The airport will satisfy the growing need for more air travel service in the region."
2)" It will be very useful to a lot of people once the airport gets underway".
3) "Business is expected to double".
4) "It could increase by as much as three to four times its current level" ( adding on to #3).
5)"More economic growth."
6) "Attract new business."

# data[].attributes.body
The author is biased and believes a new airport should be built. I did not see any thoughts too how that "big swamp" being destroyed would effect the ecosystem.He is not thinking about the cons, just the positive outcomes,  which shows he is wholly in favor of the new airport being built. Not seeing the negative side is NOT a smart business plan, especially when concerning some part of the ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased
His position is New Jersey is in need of a new Airport.
Here are my reasons why he is biased:
1. The airport will satisfy the growing need for more air travel services in the region.
2.  Warren reported It's nothing but a big swamp right now  but it will be very useful to a lot of people once the gets underway
3.more economic growth for Morris County.
3.Thousands of new jobs will open up. New opportunities for planners and construction workers. The airport will need ticket checkers, air traffic controllers, maintenance workers and many many others

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased because he is only talking about how he wants the airport to be built and how it should be built. the author said that " It will satisfy the growing need for more air travel services in the region. Also the author said a negative reason. "

# data[].attributes.body
the author seems biased (for new airports) because
1." he stated the airport  will satisfiy  the growing need for more air travel sevices in the region"
2. " it will be very useful to alot of people once the airport gets an underway "
3. "Our buisness will increase -no dobt about it"
Also the author is biased  because he uses the word WILL alot and that means that it like has to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the author wants this airport to be built and is biased because the article only offered information that proved it SHOULD be built, no information that proved it SHOULDN'T be built. It said
"There will be more economic growth in the county" and "New jobs will open up when the building begins" but no information that proves it shouldn't be built. He is only providing the good information that helps build it, not the information that proves it shouldn't be built. It's definitely good for Morris County but won't it cost money? Building an airport isn't that easy... it still costs a lot.
That is my statement. 😝🍕🍬🍨

# data[].attributes.body
The author is biased because what he said was what good stuff will happen such as they will make more money because people visit us. And one thing he said was "Our business will increase-no doubt about it."
The author didn't say anything about the bad stuff that will happen such as what problems will the airport cause because the airport could cause pollution in the air. Also the airport will need more people for jobs and that means that NYC will be even more crowded and chaotic then it already is!

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased because he only look at the positive things and none of the negative things(wants the airport to be built). Like when he said "...means more economic growth for Morris County." Which means they get more money. Also, "Thousands of new jobs will open up when building begins." Which will give other people money to provide for their families. Plus, he says," ...the other major airports ...will   soon have more business than they can handle." So, he wants the airport to be built so there will be less crowded places in the other airports.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that the author is bias because(for the airport) said in the article " The purpose of the meeting was to discuss plans for a new major airport to be built in the New York-New Jersey area." My second reason from the article is when it said "thousands of new jobs will open up when buildings begins. And once the airport opens there will be even more jobs. The airport will need ticket checkers, air traffic controllers, maintenance workers, and many others. Plus, the new airport will attract all kinds of new businesses around it. That is why i think the author was bias in this article.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author was bias because he was only talking about good things that could happen like new jobs and more economic growth but he didn't state anything about any bad things that could happen with the airport. like it could affect the environment this this article shows that the author is in favor of the airport being built.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author was bias about the airport being so great. He or she didn't say anything bad about the airport. The author said  things such as ''Thousands of jobs will open up when building begins'' and ''In 15 years, business could increase by as much as three to four times its current level''. And another big thing the author said was '' the new airport will attract all kinds of new businesses around it''. And I didn't hear one thing bad about the airport. All of this proves that the author was bias about the airport being so great.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author was bias, the author is in favor of needing more air transportation and more businesses.
-  the airport will attract all new kinds of businesses around it.
- he never said the bad things about the airport only good
- in fifteen years it could increase by as much as three to four times it's current level.😇

# data[].attributes.body
i think that the author is in favor that there should be a new airport in the New York- New Jersey area. in the article  the new airport will satisfy the growing need for more air travel service in the region. the land right now is a big swamp but it will be very useful for to a lot of people once the airport gets underway. thousands of jobs will open up when building begins. plus the  new airport will attract all kinds of new business around it. also the airport will need a lot of support by people to help them but also gives the people a lot of jobs to do as well

# data[].attributes.body
The author is biased because he was showing all the reasons they should create a new airport. Several exampled include, it will be very useful to a lot of people, there will be more economic growth in Morris County, and thousands of jobs will open up during and after the construction of the new airport.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author is biased because he didn't talk about any cons/disadvantages/bad points about the airport being built in New Jersey. For instance, the author said, "In the next five years, business is expected to double."

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author is biased(they want a new airport) because in the article it said this: 1. "Port Authority figures show that the other major airports in the area will soon have more business than they can handle." This shows that they think they should make another airport to balance it out. 2. "Our business will increase, no doubt about it."This shows that they want it to happen, so their business can increase. 3. "Thousands of new jobs will open up when building begins." This shows that people will be able to get jobs, and that can help them get money. All of this information shows me that the author is biased. They do want a new airport.

# data[].attributes.body
the author is biased i did not hear a peep out of him about how this new big airport will effect the good animals of Morris county no John Landis this will not be good for Morris county  it will absolutely obliterate the ecosystem there so there, thy author be biased

# data[].attributes.body
The author is biased for the air port because he only was talking about the economy growing if the air port was built.