# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Claim is loosely based on the text, although written in a confusing manner. It turns out trying unpleasent is just human nature is based on the fact that curosity mankind to do anything. Student attempts to use relevant text evidence. Including two direct quotations and a summarized detail. Analysis is minimal. Secondly, that human will pick the uncertain choice over the certain choice. Some sentence errors and awkwardness do impact readability.

Score Point 1

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

The claim is valid and fully responds to the prompt. The central idea of the text is that curiosity has historically propelled positive and important discoveries exploration and personal growth. Evidence is included that is somewhat relevant, but largely undeveloped. The writer uses a direct quotation and two summarized points: one about jelly beans, one about the pens. The evidence far outweighs the minimal analysis included. Student uses complete sentences where errors do not impact readability.

Score Point 1

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

The statement of claim is valid. It is posed in a question/answer format. The central idea of this text is why would anyone knowingly put themselves up to something unpleasant? Because people are naturally curious which either ends with a good or bad result. Students evidence is mostly an unrelated lengthy summarization of the jelly beans and the flavors they come in. The analysis is minimal and restates an idea that was already stated in the text. Convention errors do not impact readability.

Score Point 1

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Claim is imprecise, sentence errors make it difficult to make sense of. The central idea in both of these short storys is that when you come across something that you have to make a decision for is do what your heart is telling you. Student includes two lengthy quotations from the text that are largely unrelated to their claim. Analysis is minimal including some literal retelling of the text with some slang and informality. Sentence errors do hinder comprehension making it difficult to understand.

Score Point 1

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Claim is specific and clearly incorporates a central idea people constantly, throughout time have looked for answers and have questioned the unknown. One piece of evidence is only somewhat relevant, where the second piece of text evidence is relevant. Analysis is mostly literal with limited analytical thinking. This quote also demonstrah the lengths that people are willing to go to help with their feeling of ¨uncertainty.¨ Convention errors do not impact readability.

Score Point 2

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Claim is clear and is somewhat sophisticated as a result of pairing a central idea with text evidence. ...develops the central idea of ¨the drive to know the unknown¨ Student uses a wide range of relevant and specific evidence. The evidence is varied including phrases from the text, lines from the text and partial lines from the text. Analysis shows reflection of the text. Conventions are used effectively.

Score Point 2

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Clear, valid claim connected with a central idea is that humans are driven by curiosity. Evidence is relevant and sufficient taken from paragraph 3 and 4. Student using one part of a sentence and one whole sentence as evidence. Analysis is well stated including reflection and explicit connection back to their claim.  Humans will know of certain things but will crave to know for themselves. Even if they know the consequences are risky or dangerous they try it anyway since theyŕe curious. Conventions are used effectively.

Score Point 2

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Thoughtful claim...the author explains, ironically, our curiosity about being curious. Evidence is relevant, more than sufficient. Student uses individual words, phrases and parts of sentences as needed to support claim. Analysis is full and thoughtfully developed to show through reflection of the text. Conventions are used effectively.

Score Point 2

# data[].attributes.body
Notation:

Thoughtfully articulated claim. ...a recurring idea of curiosity is evident. As an accepted part of human nature, curiosity is quite powerful and can motivate people to do unpleasant activities. Evidence is relevant, sufficient and layered throughout the response in support of the claim. Analysis is full and thoughtfully developed to show through reflection of the text. Conventions are used effectively.

Score Point 2