# data[].attributes.body
On August 26, 1928, the appellant drank a beer that had rests of snail that were not seen until the appellant got the bottom of the bottle. The drink was made and sold by the respondent. She had a shock and gastro enteritis and sued the manufacturers, who appealed to the case.

# data[].attributes.body
On august 26, 1928, Stevenson drank a bottle of ginger beer made by Donoghue. Inside the bottle there was a dead and rotting snail that could only have been seen until after someone drinks the majority of the beer. As a result the appellant suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. She then filled a proceedings against the defendant.

# data[].attributes.body
On August 26th, 1928, the plaintiff drunk a bottle of ginger beer which was produced by defendant. Plaintiff’s friend got a beer for her and while she was drinking, she saw a snail and then she got sick and shocked. She opened the file against defendant.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928, the appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent. The appellant’s  friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The respondent’s manufactured a bottle that contained the decomposed remains of a snail. The appellant which could not see the remains until most of the bottle had been consumed. Then she alleged that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. The appellant then began a proceeding against the manufacturers which have caused this appeal.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928, the appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent. The appellant’s  friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The respondent’s manufactured a bottle that contained the decomposed remains of a snail. The appellant which could not see the remains until most of the bottle had been consumed. Then she alleged that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. The appellant then began a proceeding against the manufacturers which have caused this appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
On August 26 th, 1928, the Plaintiff drank a bottle of ginger beer, which the defendant had given to her. The bottle contained the decomposed remains of a snail which could not be detected. She suffered from shock and gastro enteritis. Therefore, she begin a proceeding against the manufacturer which have given rise to this appeal.

# data[].attributes.headline
There is a case from 1928 that is relevant to the facts and issues of your case. In that situation, the appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer that her friend had bought for her. The bottle had pieces of a dead snail in it, and the appellant didn’t notice until she drank almost half the bottle. She then sued the manufacturer because, she says, it caused her mental duress and severe intestinal issues. The case went to an appeals court so they could decide if the manufacturer should be held accountable.

# data[].attributes.subject
There is a case from 1928 that is relevant to the facts and issues of your case. In that situation, the appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer that her friend had bought for her. The bottle had pieces of a dead snail in it, and the appellant didn’t notice until she drank almost half the bottle. She then sued the manufacturer because, she says, it caused her mental duress and severe intestinal issues. The case went to an appeals court so they could decide if the manufacturer should be held accountable.

# data[].attributes.body
The appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer that she got from her friend on August 26th 1928, manufactured by the respondent. Half way through the bottle, the appellant realized that there were decomposed remains of a snail, which could not be seen until most of the drink has been consumed. The appellant ended up suffering from shock and severe gastro enteritis, which brought her to institute the proceeding against the respondent.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928 the plaintiff drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the defendant. A friend bought it from a retailer and passed it on to her. Remains of a decomposed snail were found inside the bottle, they could only be found once the entire bottle was consumed. The plaintiff suffered from gastro enteritis. She started the proceedings against the manufacturers which have given rise to this appeal.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928 the plaintiff drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the defendant. A friend bought it from a retailer and passed it on to her. Remains of a decomposed snail were found inside the bottle, they could only be found once the entire bottle was consumed. The plaintiff suffered from gastro enteritis. She started the proceedings against the manufacturers which have given rise to this appeal.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928, the Plaintiff drank a bottle of beer, produced by the Defendant but bought for and given to her by a friend.  The bottle contained snail parts which went unnoticed until the beer was finished. Consequently, the Defendent suffered shock and severe stomach pain, causing her to start proceedings against the manufacturer of the beer.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928, the Plaintiff drank a bottle of beer, produced by the Defendant but bought for and given to her by a friend.  The bottle contained snail parts which went unnoticed until the beer was finished. Consequently, the Defendent suffered shock and severe stomach pain, causing her to start proceedings against the manufacturer of the beer.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent. The appellant’s  friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The respondent’s manufactured a bottle that contained the decomposed remains of a snail. The appellant which could not see the remains until most of the bottle had been consumed. Then she alleged that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis.The appellant then began a proceeding against the manufacturers which have caused this appeal.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent. The appellant’s  friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The respondent’s manufactured a bottle that contained the decomposed remains of a snail. The appellant which could not see the remains until most of the bottle had been consumed. Then she alleged that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis.The appellant then began a proceeding against the manufacturers which have caused this appeal.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent, which a friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The bottle contained the decomposed remains of a snail which were not and could not be detected until the greater part of the contents of the bottle had been consumed. Appellant claimed that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. According to this, she sued the manufacturers and appealed later.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, manufactured by the Respondent, which a friend had bought from a retailer and given to her. The bottle contained the decomposed remains of a snail which were not and could not be detected until the greater part of the contents of the bottle had been consumed. Appellant claimed that she suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. According to this, she sued the manufacturers and appealed later.

# data[].attributes.body
The appellant in the case was given a ginger beer, made by the respondent on August 26 th, 1928. Her friend gave her the beer and she drank the majority of the bottle unaware that the bottle contained the remains of a snail which was not noticeable until most of the bottle was consumed by the appellant. In result to consumption of the ginger beer, the appellant suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis. Due to this the proceeding against the company was given rise to the appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
On August 26, 1928, the plaintiff, Ms. Stevenson, drank a bottle of ginger beer made by the manufacturer, Mr. Donohue. The plaintiff noticed remains of a snail after having drank most of the drink. The plaintiff suffered from shock and severe gastro enteritis from the drink. She is starting proceedings against the manufacturer.

# data[].attributes.body
On August 26th, 1928, the appellant drank a bottle of ginger beer, made by the respondent, which a friend had bought from a store and given to her. The bottle had decomposed remains of a snail which could not be detected until she drank most of the bottle. She then claimed she suffered from shock and severe gastroenteritis. She then started legal action against the manufacturers that started the problem.

# data[].attributes.headline
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a ginger beer made by the Respondent, which had remains of a rotten snail that she did not feel until she had drank a larger amount. Because of this incident, she suffered from shock and sever gastric conditions. And so she started the proceedings against the producers of the beer.

# data[].attributes.subject
On August 26th, 1928, the Appellant drank a ginger beer made by the Respondent, which had remains of a rotten snail that she did not feel until she had drank a larger amount. Because of this incident, she suffered from shock and sever gastric conditions. And so she started the proceedings against the producers of the beer.