# data[].attributes.body
Krashen concludes that language acquisition is more efficient than language learning for attaining functional skills in a foreign language not only in childhood.
The efficient teaching of languages isn't that tied to a packaged course of structured lessons based on grammatical sequencing, translation or oral drilling, nor is the one that relies on technological resources.
Efficient teaching is personalized.

That includes us Brazilians trying to learn English,we can definitely learn but for that we have to be motivation and get help from our teachers and definitely know the difference between learning and acquisition that It's so important for us.

# data[].attributes.body
Approaches inspired by acquisition or learning will have different effects on the learner’s level of motivation along the learning process.

They will also have activities based more on conversation rather than the study of grammar. As a result, they will produce more readily useful knowledge and raise the level of motivation as the learner builds up his communicative skills.
Learning-inspired approaches, normally tied to a syllabus, will emphasize the production of knowledge about the target language, especially its grammatical structures, at the expense of communicative skills. They will hardly meet the learner’s immediate goals.

# data[].attributes.body
“Language is best taught when it is being used to transmit messages, not when it is explicitly taught for conscious learning.”
― Stephen D. Krashen, The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash.html
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/396881.Stephen_D_Krashen

# data[].attributes.body
The only instance in which the teaching of grammar can result in language acquisition (and proficiency) is when the students are interested in the subject and the target language is used as a medium of instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
The Input hypothesis is Krashen attempt to explain how the learner acquires a second language and how second language acquisition takes place.
The Input hypothesis is only concerned with 'acquisition', not 'learning'.

# data[].attributes.headline
Let's  today talk about Stephen Krashen...Have you heard about him?

# data[].attributes.subject
Let's  today talk about Stephen Krashen...Have you heard about him?

# data[].attributes.headline
Krashen theory of second language consists of five main hypotheses 

# data[].attributes.subject
Krashen theory of second language consists of five main hypotheses 

# data[].attributes.body
the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis

the Monitor hypothesis

the Input hypothesis

the Natural Order hypothesis

and the Affective Filter hypothesis.

- The Acquisition Learning hypothesis is the most important one and the most widely known as well.
According to Krashen there are two independent systems of second language performance the acquired system and