# data[].attributes.body
The Greensboro Sit-Ins influenced the desegregation of lunch counters and increased awareness of social injustice. The protests put pressure on businesses to react and change their policies regarding service. There was a mix of reactions, many supporting the students peaceful protests while others responded with hostility. Widespread media coverage aided in attracting attention to the protests. Ultimately raising awareness about the ongoing racism and injustice towards black people.

# data[].attributes.body
While participants of the protests remained peaceful and patient. The reactions from those inside witnessing, were not. Many people were angered, following through with harmful reactions. Students faced harassment verbal threats with drinks and food poured on them. Some were even spit on by white people and their bodies used to put out cigarettes. Even though the students received infuriating actions, they remained peaceful, not clapping back. This is what stood out to people witnessing these events and helped put a different light or perspective on segregation.

# data[].attributes.body
On February 1st, 1960, four Black college students sat at a segregated lunch counter in North Carolina. The students were denied service due to their race. The students remained at the counter and engaged in a peaceful protest. It was a protest against segregation and injustice, quickly inspiring others to participate in sit-ins across communities. These sit-ins became significant in the Civil Rights Movement.

# data[].attributes.body
"It was about choice. It was about having the ability to say I choose to sit down. Or I choose to drink from that water fountain. I don't choose black water or white water or colored water. I want water."

# data[].attributes.headline
Firsthand Experiences of Participating in Sit-Ins Retold

# data[].attributes.subject
Firsthand Experiences of Participating in Sit-Ins Retold

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Reflections on the Greensboro Lunch Counter

# data[].attributes.body
The Greensboro Sit-Ins aided in advancing the Civil Rights Movement. The protests led to the desegregation of many lunch counters and public spaces across the South. The Sit-Ins pressure to businesses led to government officials addressing segregation laws. It was a turning point of advancing racial equality in the United States.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
David Richmond, Franklin McCain, Ezell A. Blair Jr., and Jopesgh McNeil.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
First lunch counter to integrate following the Greensboro Sit-Ins.

# data[].attributes.body
The Greensboro Four strategized a nonviolent protest to challenge the ways of segregation. Their plan was simple: contact a newspaper reporter, purchase items, sit down at the lunch counter, request and wait for service. They repeated a similar process the next day with a larger group, and so on and so forth. Until ultimately attracting people from other communities to participate.

# data[].attributes.body
Following the sit-ins, many businesses were left to reevaluate their policies. Many stores allowed black people to eat at the same lunch counters as white people. While others, closed down to prevent the spread of these protests occurring. The sit-ins movement saw progress after only a month with partial desegregation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Parallels to "The Scarlet Letter" and "The Crucible"

# data[].attributes.subject
Parallels to "The Scarlet Letter" and "The Crucible"

# data[].attributes.body
The Greensboro Sit-Ins parallel The Crucible in the theme of moral integrity and standing up against societal injustice. John Proctor's refusal to falsely confess himself emphasizes personal beliefs over conformity. Similarly, students in the sit-ins challenged segregation even with hostility they experienced. Abigail Williams and many other girls face societal pressure to confess and conform instead of being treated differently.

In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne endures public shame, similar to how participants in the sit-ins were embarrassed by white people's hostility but still remained true to their cause. Her wearing of the letter symbolizes resistance, much like the silent protests against unjust laws.