# data[].attributes.body
Checking if marks are awarded correctly

# data[].attributes.body
Can award M1 for first row, A1 for final ans?

# data[].attributes.body
How should we penalise? Can ignore 32 since M2A1 is in the table? Circle 4 and point to Ans line? Haha

# data[].attributes.body
Can award mark?

# data[].attributes.body
I think he meant number of spider legs and number of butterflies legs but he wrote “number of spiders” and “number of butterflies”. Can? :(

# data[].attributes.body
A0?

# data[].attributes.body
Need to deduct for presentation?

# data[].attributes.body
Draw it out but missing one leg 🙃 can accept?

# data[].attributes.body
-0.5m for presentation?

# data[].attributes.body
m1 for working of 12 x 8 =96 and that’s all right? Even though it’s not stated as number statement

# data[].attributes.body
Is the incorrect equation here being penalised?

# data[].attributes.body
Q19(a)

As long as there is a clear outline for Jane to be at 20 exactly, we award even if there's no shading.

# data[].attributes.body
Note: If table with header clearly shown, but number statements not stated, we still award the method marks.

If… child lucky first try got it.. able to show the number statements clearly, we award M2 A1

However, if only final answer is written without anything else, A1 for the whole question.

# data[].attributes.body
Alternative Method:

41-34=7

7x8 (M1) = 56

Note: If 7 x 8 is not shown, look for positive evidence of doing so (e.g. algorithm or listing the skip counting of 8. If present, award M1, otherwise, only A1 for answer)

# data[].attributes.body
Notes:

Q11, if they wrote A instead of 3A, accept and award A1.

Q13b, if they included the remainder, i.e. 131R5, 0 mark since qn asked for quotient.

Q14, if no method shown but answer is correct, award A2 (since it's SAQ)

Q15, if they wrote A/B instead of 3A/3B, accept and award A1 each.

# data[].attributes.body
(b) 34 X 8 is correct but child did his multiplication wrongly. Thus, subtraction equation was wrong. Was wondering do we consider follow through here? can award method mark?

# data[].attributes.body
Q13b

working correct but answer written 131R5

M1 A0?

# data[].attributes.body
Q12 : transfer error but show working with correct answer

# data[].attributes.body
How strict are we on showing equations! (We definitely taught it just that students don’t follow 🫣)

# data[].attributes.body
Fluke?

# data[].attributes.body
Clarifying for part (b) - do we accept if its a cross?

# data[].attributes.body
Clarifying for part (c) - just A1 right? No need for method/working/equation.

# data[].attributes.body
Method correct, but calculation for part (a) wrong.

Will part (b) be given credit?

# data[].attributes.body
Part (b)

Method:

41-34 = 7 (number of boxes unsold)

Missing method: 7x8

Can the answer mark be awarded?

# data[].attributes.body
Would we accept if its not “3A”, “3B”

# data[].attributes.body
No neg evidence to suggest alt answer, but response not written in answer blank.