# data[].attributes.body
They might have involved acknowledging and respecting the Native American tribes, honoring treaties and agreements, and seeking beneficial arrangements that will help both sides, for land use and resources. Moreover, helping grow cultural exchange and understanding could have helped bridge the two groups together.

# data[].attributes.body
Why would the American government go to the trouble of creating the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty just to break it by ordering the military into protected land? (evidence should reference the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty also)

They failed to keep these treaties because of several factors, including the desire for access to valuable resources such as gold, timber, and land for settlement and expansion.

With The government's failure to deliver needs for the natives in the 1851 treaty, it resulted in the 1868 treaty.

Following the Colorado Gold Rush, the US government renegotiated with the Natives, leading to the signing of the Treaty of Fort Wise in 1861.

The new treaty caused a division within both tribes and increased hostilities, and soon leading to tragedies like the Sand Creek Massacre.

# data[].attributes.body
What were the problems that existed in the negotiations between Anglo-Americans and Native Americans during the 1830s-1850s?

How much of these problems could be attributed to a clash of perspectives?

The rapid expansion of railroads brought about increased pressure on Native American lands, leading to land being forcfully given up, displacement, and loss of traditional territories. The perspectives between the two, are seeking to advance industrial and economic interests whilsts the Native Americans strive to protect their cultural lands and ways of life further worse the negotiation challenges like the Indian removal act, and more.

# data[].attributes.body
What were the problems that existed in the negotiations between Anglo-Americans and Native Americans during the 1830s-1850s?

Land Disputes: The main source of conflict was land. Anglo-Americans wanted to get more land for their, agriculture, and resource extraction, with often treaties that were not always negotiated in good terms. This led to the removal of Native American tribes from their own lands.

Broken treaties: Many treaties and agreements between the two parties were broken or changed by the government and settlers, leading to loss of trust and tension between one another.

How much of these issues could be attributed to a clash of perspectives?

The Anglo-American perspective wanted westward expansion, economic development, and land ownership. For the Native American, their perspectives were deeply rooted in communal land use, spiritual and cultural importance of the land, and making decision as a unity.

# data[].attributes.body
Basic Search - Gale Academic Onefile, go.gale.com/ps/start.do?p=AONE&u. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.

“Guided Readings: Indian Policy.” Guided Readings: Indian Policy | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/guided-readings/guided-readings-indian-policy. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.

“Sioux Treaty of 1868.” National Archives and Records Administration, National Archives and Records Administration, www.archives.gov/education/lessons/sioux-treaty. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.

Treaty of Fort Laramie | Colorado Encyclopedia, coloradoencyclopedia.org/article/treaty-fort-laramie. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.

Treaty of Fort Laramie | Colorado Encyclopedia, coloradoencyclopedia.org/article/treaty-fort-laramie. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.

“Western Folkways.” Ushistory.Org, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/us/41.asp. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.