# data[].attributes.body
I’d love support around developing a TSG goal based on the content.

# data[].attributes.body
last year, my teams struggled to complete this. Some of the data asked for is not easily pulled from the IEP software. The tables for this activity need to be updated early each school year to stay relevant. We're asking EOs to compare old SED data to their current real life data. For example, if the original table indicates 2018-19 data, that's now going back 5 years. I have to change this manually.

# data[].attributes.body
This summer in prep for the full TSG, I asked EO teams (at this point, the director and a partner) to do this activity. I pulled the teams together and just did the data review and the guiding questions. The results will be shared with the full team when we do module 2. I did this to save time. When I did module 2 by the book last year, the EOs struggled with this activity and it threw off the TSG schedule almost a whole day

# data[].attributes.body
I'm concerned about the redundancy of this module. Family engagement is woven through the other modules and then repeated here again.

In my opinion, this TSG needs to be completed before January (annual review season) so the EO's can incorporate their new learning into their annual review process. Time is precious and this module is a drag on the schedule.

# data[].attributes.body
In almost every other opportunity I have experienced, you do action planning as you go. If you do monthly sessions, 5-6 months have passed before you finally get to the plan.

I would prefer having actions developed at the end of each module. While we instruct and strongly encourage EOs to complete their participant packets for each module, result may vary. So going way back to the beginning can be problematic

# data[].attributes.body
slides 22 and 23 need to be updated every year

# data[].attributes.body
pretty straight forward

# data[].attributes.headline
Layered Continuum of Supports;An Individual Student Perspective

# data[].attributes.subject
Layered Continuum of Supports;An Individual Student Perspective

# data[].attributes.body
slide 25 is very good. Carol Koznitsky would call this the "jagged profile". I think this opens up thinking about the flexibility of the continuum. Gen ed for this subject, special class for this subject etc. ...

# data[].attributes.body
In order for folks to write in their participant packets if presented virtually, packet needs to be a Word or Google doc.

# data[].attributes.body
slides and tables in packet will need to be updated every year, update by advancing the years, for example, advance 2013 to 2014.

Also, I think that EOs should look at the very last year's data that they have. If it's 2024, 2021 isn't that helpful

# data[].attributes.body
I like this video

# data[].attributes.body
I struggled with the High Leverage Practices activity as the facilitator. I found it difficult to find the specific numbered items in the article. some were obvious, some not so much. Maybe it's just me.

activity is very time consuming.

# data[].attributes.body
slide 18 is cool

# data[].attributes.body
slide 22 video is very good

# data[].attributes.body
having building leaders attend this session worked well, especially when we are promoting to schedule SPED first

# data[].attributes.body
I love all the docs in this Mod and figured out a way (with permission) to go deeper into each with report-out by groups.