# data[].attributes.body
CHALLENGE - To what extent has this tax been effective in achieving its intended goals? Justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using an indirect tax in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyse the impact of this tax on at least two stakeholders (e.g. consumers, producers, government).

# data[].attributes.body
Using your RWE, describe the type of indirect tax implemented and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Calls for fast food tax to turn ‘industry on its head’

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There are calls to make healthy food cheaper and fast foods more expensive.

# data[].attributes.body
CHALLENGE - To what extent has this tax been effective in achieving its intended goals? Justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using an indirect tax in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyse the impact of this tax on at least two stakeholders (e.g. consumers, producers, government).

# data[].attributes.body
Using your RWE, describe the type of indirect tax implemented and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Denmark has agreed on how to implement the world's first tax on agricultural emissions, including flatulence by livestock.

This comes after months of negotiations between the country's major parties, farmers, the industry, trade unions and environmental groups. The Green Tripartite agreement was first announced in June.

From 2030, farmers will have to pay a levy of 300 kroner ($43; £34) per tonne of methane (as per carbon dioxide equivalent) on emissions from livestock including cows and pigs, which will rise to 750 kroner in 2035.

The Green Tripartite minister said they will "do what it takes to reach our climate goals" after receiving a "broad majority" in parliament.

"[It is a] huge, huge task that is now underway: to transform large parts of our land from agricultural production to forestry, to natural spaces, to ensure that we can bring life back to our fjords," Jeppe Bruus said.

Part of the Green Tripartite agreement between the government, the agriculture industry and environmental organisations is to also reduce nitrogen pollution in an effort to restore the coasts and fjords. Nitrogen emissions could be reduced by 13,780 tonnes annually from 2027, AFP news agency reported.

A concerted effort will also be made to improve the country's biodiversity.

According to Danish daily The Copenhagen Post, 250,000 hectares of new forest will be planted, and 140,000 hectares of peatlands that are currently being cultivated will be restored to natural habitat.

Peatlands are wetlands characterised by waterlogged conditions and are known carbon stores.

Around 60% of Denmark's territory is currently cultivated, making it together with Bangladesh the country with the highest share of cultivated land, according to a Danish parliamentary report.

"Danish nature will change in a way we have not seen since the wetlands were drained in 1864," Mr Bruus said, as quoted by AFP news agency.

Speaking about the agreement, the Danish minister for climate, energy and utilities, Lars Aagaard, said it showed the country's "willingness to act".

"It also shows the Danish model - broad political majority in the Danish parliament [and] involvement of the sectors that will be affected by the tax and involvement of environmental stakeholders," he added, explaining these are "things that we could all benefit from if the rest of the world could foster such cooperation in the climate fight."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Flatulence tax: Denmark agrees deal to tax farmers for livestock emissions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It is part of a wider plan to reduce emissions and pollution and restore natural habitat.

# data[].attributes.body
CHALLENGE - To what extent has this tax been effective in achieving its intended goals? Justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using an indirect tax in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyse the impact of this tax on at least two stakeholders (e.g. consumers, producers, government).

# data[].attributes.body
Using your RWE, describe the type of indirect tax implemented and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Colombia Votes To Tax Junk Food And Sugary Drinks - Health Policy Watch

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For over six years, civil society groups led by the children’s rights group Red PaPaz have advocated for additional taxes on junk food and drinks.

# data[].attributes.body
CHALLENGE - To what extent has this tax been effective in achieving its intended goals? Justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using an indirect tax in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyse the impact of this tax on at least two stakeholders (e.g. consumers, producers, government).

# data[].attributes.body
Using your RWE, describe the type of indirect tax implemented and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tax unhealthy foods to tackle obesity, say campaigners

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Health and children’s groups urge UK ministers to impose levies on products containing too much salt or sugar

# data[].attributes.body
CHALLENGE - To what extent has this tax been effective in achieving its intended goals? Justify your answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using an indirect tax in this case.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyse the impact of this tax on at least two stakeholders (e.g. consumers, producers, government).

# data[].attributes.body
Using your RWE, describe the type of indirect tax implemented and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Private schools: When and why is VAT being added to fees?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The government says the rule change will raise £460m extra to spend in state schools in 2024/25.