# data[].attributes.body
There was a lot that Ebony McGee wrote and spoke about that were really important,. For example, colorblind ideology is not the solution because it ignores lived experiences and the contribution that people of diversity can contribute to our collective education and growth

# data[].attributes.body
I think drafting the FLC norms was a really interesting exercise.  Lots of things to consider about inclusivity and what that means

I think we did a good job discussing topics like privilege, identity, racial trauma as not being deficiencies.  Talking about getting away from the deficit model of students was really important, and we did a reasonably good job of that in our discussions

Being more inclusive, addressing white supremacy, discrimination etc. doesn't mean lowering standards, expecting students to learn less, or reducing content.  This is an important point when thinking of modifying courses.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Beginning of the FLC with each person telling their personal story. This solidified for me the importance of reflecting on and acknowledging our history and experience, and considering how our students may have different histories.

# data[].attributes.body
I remember the discussion about how HBCUs are doing most of the work in successfully graduating black students (and black students in STEM specifically). I was reminded of this at a conference where they talked about the Meyerhoff scholars program at University of Maryland which started off as a cohorting-style stem scholarship program for black undergraduate men.

The practices and assumptions in STEM learning reflect the culture, cultural practices, and cultural values.

Zones for the work of anti-racism.

Questions asked using the lens from each of D, E, I, and SJ .