# data[].attributes.body
I think he did a good job explaining how to down size and use different things for the same purpose. He did not have enough evidence to back up why less space is better in some situations.

# data[].attributes.body
He did good at explaining why you should spend less and how it effects you and the world, but he didn't do that well of explaining people in mansions.

# data[].attributes.body
He needs to have more evidence, but he was very convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he could have

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it was really cool when he started with the box of stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
 effective.
Avatar of Oksana Spindler
Oksana Spindler
 +  46
●
4m

# data[].attributes.body
he needs to tell people to bring their own chairs

# data[].attributes.body
He needs to have evidence that having less stuff and living in smaller places makes you happier.

# data[].attributes.body
He could have explained how some of his editing tips what stuff to edit He did good explaining why to get rid of stuff

# data[].attributes.body
He was good at the end by saying Thank you very much

# data[].attributes.body
good: effects
bad: those who live in mansions

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: He interacted with the audience multiple times by asking questions to draw them into the topic even more.

Ineffective: He continued to talk about how living in an apartment saves more money, but also showed that he added multiple special appliances that would cost more money to add to your living space.

# data[].attributes.body
that we should downsize on pollutions of power and swage
one thing that was not effective was his enthusiasm

# data[].attributes.body
Effective:
He started out with a funny/interesting hook that made the audience curious about what he was talking about.

Not Effective: He talked about saving money but the appliance was super expensive which was contradictory.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: he has evidence that less space makes you happier and also leaves less of a footprint
Ineffective: He said that less space saves money, but he customizes everything in his apartment and that would cost a lot more and be more difficult to move

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: he did a good job explaining everything in detail enough that you could follow in your mind.

What he could do better: He could have made the article less boring but it also felt like he was telling me to do this and not actually trying to persuade me.

# data[].attributes.body
He did good at explaining his reasonings for living smaller and shared personal connections with doing so that can make his speech more personable.
He could've shared the negative effects on living small and what you are losing from cutting down all of your belongings in half.

# data[].attributes.body
he did good explaining what type of effects having a smaller footprint can do

but he could have explained better why this matters and why does it matter in the long run

# data[].attributes.body
he did really well with tying his introduction to the end of his talk and wrapped it up nicely. he could have talked less and repeated himself less. some things he kept talking about could have been ended sooner.

# data[].attributes.body
Give ways to help with this

# data[].attributes.body
he showed us that we could save money or live a better life with less space. He showed us that less space, less stuff = less CO2, and more money. I feel like he could have explained the ways to save space better.

# data[].attributes.body
He did a good job sticking to his theme and relating it back to the audience while also giving them a call to action.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective- he did a good job sayin all the benefits and good reasons to having a smaller space.

Could have done better at why it will make you happier cause he didn't put to much into it and gave not that many reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
effective: he showed us how to save space and gave us tips.

something he did bad was he talked too long about nothing before he gave us tips

# data[].attributes.body
Effective:  Tells us that what is in the box doesn't matter even though he took it with him.
Ineffective:  Gave more than one  conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: He presented facts to support his lifestyle/argument
Bad: Weird double closing thing that was awkward.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he did a good job at his introduction and his closing statements.

I believe he could have done a better job at giving some more evidence to support his reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
He transitioned well and explained his evidence well. He could have showed us what was in the box and also shared ways to maximize space even if you aren't living in a small place.

# data[].attributes.body
his restated his claim multiple time to make sure the audience knows what all this is for and tied it up.
What he could work on is some of the finer detail of some smaller living capabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
He did well at explaining the benefits of less, and how it can bring you more happiness.

# data[].attributes.body
He did good at trying to explain that less space can make people more happy because you spend less money.

He could have had a better claim and a better opening statement for the box because it wasn't that interring and make me think why and I listening to someone talk about a box.

# data[].attributes.body
He sounded like he enjoyed talking about Life edit.

Better: explain how it would save more money and how it would improve my life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he had a good hook, but the delivery could've been better. He thought he was funny but wasn't, so that was kind of awkward. Right now he's more of a Ned Talk time of guy, but if he puts some skill points into charisma he can work his way up.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: Had an interesting topic and told us the benefits of saving space

Affective: Kept adding on the argument making me lose interest in it really fast.

# data[].attributes.body
tells us how we can be more efficient, space-saving, and smaller footprint

# data[].attributes.body
Effective:
He was friendly an relatable.
Ineffective:
Some of his reasons didn't have enough evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
His argument was affective because he made many points as to why it is good to save space.

# data[].attributes.body
I thought that his method of engagement was effective. While he was speaking, I thought, "huh, he does have a point."

I started to get bored, however, when he started talking about the all-in-one room. It started to feel like some odd scandal.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: The man was good at telling us the benifits of having less

Affective: Did not supply any possible ways to tackle a counter claim

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: he did a good job telling the benefits and saying why is will help.

Could of done better: why it will make me happier.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: telling us benifets of saving space

affective:Adding to the argument

# data[].attributes.body
What was effective was that he was positive and happy.
He didn't say how to save space.

# data[].attributes.body
He sounded pos
tive and happy and gave good reasons but he belived in his opion to much yep.
'

# data[].attributes.body
He did well on being someone that you want to pay attention to.
He could have improved on explaining how to save space a little more.

# data[].attributes.body
less space can be better
include more fun facts

# data[].attributes.body
His argument was effective because it makes you think but he

# data[].attributes.body
More info on carbon footprint but the other evidence was really good and made me think about what I do.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective
He did well telling the benefits of saving space and how it will bring you happiness.
He could have done better
Strategys of saving space, like what to do to help this.

# data[].attributes.body
The cost comparison between the apartments was good. It show the money people could be saving, but it was also a negative because some people can afford a big house.

# data[].attributes.body
What he did that was effective was his evidence and how less=more.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective: Bringing up how efficient a house can be with little room was extremely effective.
Better: Hill could have implemented a counter-argument in his argument, since there wasn't a visible counter claim and rebuttal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What was one thing that WAS effective and one thing that WAS NOT effective about Hill's argument?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What was one thing that WAS effective and one thing that WAS NOT effective about Hill's argument?

# data[].attributes.body
Double click anywhere to make your post.

# data[].attributes.body
he was efficient on how he stated how less mans more but he was not efficient  with on how he explained his evidence to support that claim