# data[].attributes.body
1) Watch the video in the Problem Statement, and pick out at least 3 claims to analyze.
2) The claims should be of different types (so up to 5 claims total).
3) You may follow the template provided in LEO, but the focus should be on explaining
a) How you identified the type of claim, and
b) How you would check if the claim was (likely) true or false
4) Min. of 300 words, and Max of 600 words.

# data[].attributes.headline
For these new samples, identify the type of claim. Next, decide if the suggested method for checking if the claim is true is correct.

# data[].attributes.subject
For these new samples, identify the type of claim. Next, decide if the suggested method for checking if the claim is true is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
"Grand larceny is when you steal someone's personal property, and it's worth above a certain amount"

Find a group of lawyers and check if they agree.

# data[].attributes.body
"You are not able to sleep because you drank too much coffee just now"

Find a way to measure the exact caffeine content in the coffee consumed.

Looks like there is a difference in your responses which is good. Can you work out whether or not the method is correct as a team?

# data[].attributes.body
"Ivan is such a dedicated gym instructor"

Check with Ivan's clients and have him rated on various categories (e.g. knowledge, instruction, friendliness, reliability).

# data[].attributes.body
"Vincent Van Gogh only sold one painting in his lifetime"

We can obtain two paintings, one by Van Gogh and one by another, set the same price, and see which one sells faster.

# data[].attributes.body
"We should ban the use of handphones in the classroom"

We can refer to the school rules of conduct handbook to check if it is true.

Suppose the handbook for your neighbourhood says that you should steal something from a neighbour once a week. If we follow you reasoning that handbooks tell us what we should or shouldn't do, then we should steal from our neighbour. Do you agree?

# data[].attributes.body
1) Attempt SCORM package 1
2) Try the first set of questions in padlet as a team. Have a discussion and respond to one another's ideas. *To be done by start of 2nd meeting at 1015 am
3) Attempt package 2
4) I will add a new set of questions to be answered later

# data[].attributes.body
True or False - If I cannot show right now whether a sentence is true or false (e.g. There will be 10 billion humans in the year 2100), it is not a claim.

Can everyone look at Kezia's response and comment? Specifically, do you all agree that the claim above is non-verifiable?

# data[].attributes.body
True or False - A claim can be verifiable AND subjective if everyone in that situation agrees to a meaning.
OK. Looks like you are both somewhat clear about how Subjective and Objective are opposite, so a single claim CANNOT be both.

How would you deal with this example -

"This test is very difficult,  and you can see that only 20% of students passed."

Ok, it looks like some of you feel like there is some attempt to support the first part with the second part on percentages. Kezia thinks that 'difficult' makes the first part subjective, and this is correct. Is the second part subjective too?

Ok, so the key thing to note here is that the sentence is actually a COMPLEX one, made up of two claims. We can split it up into

'This test is very difficult'
and
'Only 20% of students passed'.

So again, remember, a SINGLE claim cannot be both subjective and objective.

# data[].attributes.body
True or False - If a sentence is non-verifiable, then it is NOT a claim.

Ok, so be very clear about this. A non-verifiable sentence is still saying something that COULD be true or false, which means it IS still a claim.

Try this new example.
Is the following sentence verifiable - "There was a poodle underneath the surface of mars yesterday."

Ok, this was a confusing example, but do note that this claim IS verifiable. And we can verify it to be FALSE (by gathering the right evidence).

So do note that Verifiable does NOT mean that it is already proven true. Verifiable just means that the whole claim has a fixed, objective meaning. There is no word in the above example that is subjective.