# data[].attributes.body
This case study talks about Social Media in relation to politics and the society.

Theoretically, social media provides a voice to every individual. However, some of these platforms have evolved to be a large disseminator of fake news and propaganda, which alter the public's thinking to be biased, hijacking democracy.

Social media is JUST a platform; a reflection of society as a whole. All parties must have a willingness to seek opinions that extend beyond their individually held beliefs and ideologies. People must be diligent in filtering fake news and having constructive dialogues, respecting that the different individuals in the world have varying beliefs and ideologies in order for democracy to continue to exist, whether it is democracy by participation or democracy by inclusivity.

# data[].attributes.body
These individuals post a lot of fake news and propaganda in social media like twitter, facebook and google. These social networks hold the potential to alter civic engagement so its essentially hijacking democracy.

# data[].attributes.body
The second case study is about the regulation of social media. Today, many cases tell us that social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. can cause violence. Trump, for example, has made posts that incite violence during his campaign, which can affect social order and cause violent terror, addressing the broader trend of social media platforms promoting and amplifying conspiracy theories, marginalized groups and other problematic content. However, social media is a platform for free speech, and media regulation needs to be balanced, leaving enough space for free speech and enough regulation to prevent violence. After years of controversy over President Trump's use of social media to share misleading content and anger his millions of followers, social media giants Facebook and Twitter last week finally took a clear stand, permanently removing Trump from their platforms prohibit. As the Internet becomes more global and connected, and information is shared online, the regulation of social media is crucial, but at the same time, maintaining freedom of speech is also essential

# data[].attributes.body
The internet has had an impact on audiences and various industries, in the article it was said that the internet has forever changed our expectations of the workplace, media consumption and communication. I think my point in this statement is that due to the development of the internet there has been online shopping, which has provided convenience for viewers but viewers have lost the communication of going out shopping with friends or family. It has also led to many industries being affected, such as shopping malls, which will be affected economically by this convenient move of the internet and may face closure.

# data[].attributes.body
Social media outlets facebook and Twitter have blocked Trump's account on the platform. This is because Trump was using social media to post misleading content and incite his millions of followers. Some people think that the ban is a good thing and avoids the risk of inciting violence, while many others condemn the ban as an infringement of freedom of expression. In my opinion, I believe that freedom of expression must be based on good, and if your speech is misleading content that brings bad influence to the world, I believe that the method of banning must be implemented. Take for example online violence, if freedom of speech is allowed to grow, it will allow those who run amok on the internet to harm more people, and if the method of banning is not implemented, more people will be harmed or even die.

# data[].attributes.body
This case study brings to light the impact the internet has made on industries.

It has reshaped and reimagined how we obtain, understand and produce content. At times even forcing existing companies to rework how they approach and understand the market.

Forever changing how users consume. From political to medical and even educational services their platform has needed to shift with the times. Efficiency brought about by the internet has made previous progression too slow and somewhat obsolete.

The internet is versatile and all encapsulating. It is no wonder it has the ability to shift and mould itself to whatever the companies and or consumers need.

# data[].attributes.body
The second case study focuses on the idea of how the new generation aims to handle media regulation.

The need for regulation stems from the fact that comments made over platforms online such as twitter have sparked and may have even perpetuated violence.

How the lack of balance in a free speech platform has the potential to lead to the spread of misinformation and chaos. The need for government and self-regulation becomes all the more necessary when lives are at stake.

The article follows facebook and twitters decision to officially ban Trump the former president of the US as he has been found to constantly use his platform to spread misinformation and untrue statements.

Being the president of a country and not considering the problems and the potential harm spreading fake news may cause has placed the question of how these governments aim to regulate these types of media when world leaders take part in the chaos.

As the internet becomes wider and more interconnected there is an increasing need to set boundaries in terms of content and the methods of regulation.

# data[].attributes.body
[Internet on Institutions in the Future]

This article provides some mass survey results and the views of many media people on the Internet and future institutions.

In general, it is the development of science and technology that makes the Internet more common, resulting in the audience can use the Internet at a lower cost and easier to connect with each other.

On the one hand, institutions can provide services to audiences / consumers according to the characteristics of the Internet: including finance, medical treatment and government, which are called remote service / self-service. The standardization and certification of information and transactions will eventually enable institutions to share knowledge through the Internet, so as to provide better and higher quality services. This is from William luciw, managing director, viewpoint West partners LLC.

Everything has its pros and cons. Because of this, the Internet will not only bring convenience to institutions, but also bring some bad benefits to institutions.

# data[].attributes.body
This case study questions the idea of free speech and democracy provided by social media platforms when so many sites have been used for propaganda, fake news, disruptive voices, ideologies and messages.

The study questions how and why a platform initially promoted as a space where the voiceless are provided with a voice. Moreover, an academic tool and even promoting the ideas of academic collaborations has turned into a platform where fake news and disruption runs rampant.

The idea called into question is whether or not democracy is being hijacked as media sites, being highly influential, have the ability to persuade users. Therefore free speech and thinking for oneself is further questioned.

The level of influence social media has makes it no secret that the potential for political discourse is high and therefore, the study points out that from voting turnouts, opinions and even populism is all dictated by social media. The grasp politicians and political figures want to have over these platforms are evident but the purpose of social media is to provided a more equal platform for all individuals.