# data[].attributes.body
The death penalty should exist. There are crazy people who have killed and harmed others. Some of these people have escaped from prisons various times. The death penalty helps eliminate these types of people and also lowers the amount of money the country has to spend on prisons. It also shows citizens the possible consequences or punishments given for certain crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
The government should spend more money on higher education because it is very important. If people have a higher education, they would have a better job, which contributes a lot to the country in the form of takes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS? (Raquel)

# data[].attributes.subject
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS? (Raquel)

# data[].attributes.body
The US should use drones to attack ISIS because they are more accurate than bombs and other weapons, meaning less innocent civilians will be killed.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS?-PRO

# data[].attributes.subject
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS?-PRO

# data[].attributes.body
Drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon. The traditional weapons of war - bombs, shells, mines, mortars cause more unintended ("collateral") damage to people.(yulema

# data[].attributes.headline
How should the U.S. handle the handle the Syrian refugee crisis? (Amaya Battle)

# data[].attributes.subject
How should the U.S. handle the handle the Syrian refugee crisis? (Amaya Battle)

# data[].attributes.body
The US should allow some refugees to live in the US, but they should first find out if they have ties to terrorists. The US should also help by making more refugee camps, so refugees can live there will they are looking for a place to live.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS?

# data[].attributes.subject
Should the US continue using drones to attack ISIS?

# data[].attributes.body
( PRO )                                                    I think we should continue using drones to attack ISIS because we can use it for to track and attack high-value ISIS terrorist in Iraq and Syria. ( yulema

# data[].attributes.body
( CON ) The US now is paying for the damages, and many troops died

# data[].attributes.headline
Should the U.S. have attacked Iraq? (Pro) (Raquel)

# data[].attributes.subject
Should the U.S. have attacked Iraq? (Pro) (Raquel)

# data[].attributes.body
The U.S. should have attacked Iraq because they were said to have WMD and Saddam Hussein had ties to Al- Qaeda. If we did not go to war with Iraq, there would be a possibility of them attacking us or other countries with their WMD. The terrorism rate would have probably stayed the same because all the Muslim groups don't like each other and they have always paid groups to attack the other kind, even before the U.S. got involved the did not like each other. Once the Shiites would gain power on their own, the Sunni's would rebel in the same way by creating ISIS.

# data[].attributes.body
Yulema Valentin- Candidate
Amaya Battle- Campaign Manager
Raquel Rebollar- Webmaster
Pablo Ruiz- Advisor
Destiny Padilla- Advisor

# data[].attributes.body
( CON )                                                       If Bush didn't invade Iraq, the Iraqi people would be in a much better shape today and the threat of terrorism would be much lower                              ( Yulema V. )

# data[].attributes.body
( CON )                                                The US invaded Iraq for no justifiable reason what so ever, Bush and Blair killed more than 1 Million innocent Iraqi civilians and the war led to the deaths of more than 5,000   ( Yulema V. )

# data[].attributes.body
Yulema Valentin