# data[].attributes.body
the best way to protest is to do it peacefully this way people can see your point instead of the violence and this can be proven in real life for example blm there are so many news outlets covering black lives matter and they only covered the violence and raids instead of what the protests were actually about in excerpt 1 the author says people should question how effective viloence in protest actually are the quote i wanna use is  by William Faulkner “Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.” and i agree

# data[].attributes.body
Violent protests are not as effective as peaceful protests. This is shown in Excerpt 2 "People often forget the cause and focus on the violence.  Overshadowed by the violence is the cause." This shows how violence in protests often overshadows and takes away from the actual protest as people become more focused on the violent acts being committed and those doing the violent acts are looking for more unjust things to do. In addition, peaceful protests have been seen to gain more support than violent protest, also supported by Excerpt 2 "nonviolent movements were more effective at winning domestic and international support" Therefore, peaceful protests are more effective than violent protests.

# data[].attributes.body
In expert 2 the author indicates that peaceful protesting would be more successful then violent protesting. Also the fact that violent protesting can cause the issue to be distracted and more focused on  the violence then the matter in hand then peaceful protesting allows the issue to be heard more and focused on. This is all said in the expecert “nonviolent movements were more effective at winning domestic and international support and at winning loyalty shifts within a regime’s security forces. “ This shows the the task in hand is better peaceful then violent

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2 the author states how violence in the protest can ruin the image and affect the support for that protest "Existing research generally finds that violence by protesters reduces public support for the protesters and can even erode support for the causes they support." showing how it can potentially ruin the image and affect the amount of support due to the violence.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt two, the author states how violence in protesting is worse than a peaceful protest. Being violent in a protest can damage many properties and peaceful protests have a better chance of getting support from others.

# data[].attributes.body
n the first excerpt it says“There’s certainly more evidence that peaceful protests are more successful because they build a wider coalition,''Thi s proves that peaceful protests are better than violent ones

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt 2, the author said that violence by protesters reduces public support for the protesters and can even erode support for the causes they support.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2, the author speaks on how we can use our voices to speak on things and choose non violent ways to help affect social change.

# data[].attributes.body
People should think before they do something violence to hurt other people and do something bad is not a freedom is hell. For example Starr was   there when the police office kill her friend right in front of her that is hell and we all know that she will never give up on the people she love the most. God always say love the people who love u and she loves khalil. Excerpt 2

# data[].attributes.body
People can make a change and cause no violence that can be a winning reward you the community or others because you adapt being a changed person.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2, the author states that being violent is not the right way and will definitely have many consequences. He also found out about studies that show that non-violent protests actually are a lot more effective than violent protests as they are actually able to get their word through by reasoning rather than trying to scream through gun fire.

# data[].attributes.body
We can use freedom of speech peacefully instead of violence because violence can cause deaths or injuries and lead to arrests.

# data[].attributes.body
The act of free speech gives us that ability and stripping anyone from that right leads to a less progressive world. Through speeches, rallies, and protests, being able to use your voice is how people can speak out about the things that they believe in. It’s also how others become involved.

# data[].attributes.body
Our faith says that the human community is like a body — if one part of the community is hurting, then the whole body is hurting

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2 the author writes that protesting violently is ineffective and doesn't help to ignite social change. They drew a data set showing that using no violence in protests was much more effective than using violence.

# data[].attributes.body
In this Excerpt 2 the author claims that violence is not the answer and making a change can show a difference. In this article my quote I picked from the text it stated “, Stephan and Chenoweth (2008) found that nonviolent movements were more effective at winning domestic and international support and at winning loyalty shifts within a regime’s security forces.” This means that making a big change in society or environment can change someone’s life or personality about themselves. Being heard or taking at stand can mean something and becoming a better person in that stand, you can change or know a lot by seeing and hearing people’s voices that’s being heard. People can make a change and cause no violence that can be a winning reward you the community or others because you adapt being a changed person.

# data[].attributes.body
In this Excerpt 2 the author claims that violence is not the answer and making a change can show a difference. In this article my quote I picked from the text it stated “, Stephan and Chenoweth (2008) found that nonviolent movements were more effective at winning domestic and international support and at winning loyalty shifts within a regime’s security forces.” This means that making a big change in society or environment can change someone’s life or personality about themselves. Being heard or taking at stand can mean something and becoming a better person in that stand, you can change or know a lot by seeing and hearing people’s voices that’s being heard. People can make a change and cause no violence that can be a winning reward you the community or others because you adapt being a changed person.

# data[].attributes.body
The author hints at the fact that non-violent protests are overall better and more effective than violent ones as well as giving us evidence to support that fact. In excerpt 2, the Author shows us a large number of evidence showing us that non-violent protests are more effective than violent ones, such as "in the 1960s, regions featuring nonviolent protests by black civil rights activists saw increased Democratic voting by whites." The quote shows us clear evidence, along with many other pieces of definitive proof that violent protests are less effective.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 1 there's evidence that proves peaceful protest is more successful than violent protests. This means that doing peaceful protest will cause less conflict with the authority, which makes the protest safe, and more effective.

# data[].attributes.body
In the second excerpt the author emphasizes on how peaceful protests can make some change compared to violent protests/riots.

# data[].attributes.body
In expert 2 the author says peacefully protesting is better then being violent.

# data[].attributes.body
We can use our voices to ignite social change by peacefully protesting. The author from Excerpt 2 claims that peacefully protesting has been studied and seen as more successful than violent protests.

# data[].attributes.body
we can use out voice to ignite a social change by in excerpt 2 when the author talks about violence

# data[].attributes.body
Exercpt #2, it's shows evidence that non-violent protests are more effective than violent protest because it would backfire.

# data[].attributes.body
Violent protests are not much effective .in the text it states,"Other studies have shown that public support for a movement wanes
when it uses violent tactics, and that violence damages the perceived
legitimacy of groups"This shows that public might not focus on the point of the protest .They might also not look at it from a positive point of view .And people whoa re against the protest might try to bring the protesters down and call their movement a cult

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 1 the author claims It is better to peacefully protest than to have a violence protest so that everyone can be heard with no violence and so that people can support and can be inspired by this.

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt 2 the author claims that peaceful protests are more effective  when compared to violent protests because they gain more public and international support and even Win loyalty shifts. "in the 1960s, regions featuring nonviolent protests by black civil rights activists saw increased Democratic voting by whites". But when people protest violently they might think that at first it is going good, but that's not true because they will end up having no sources and no support, instead people will be mad because of all the problems it can cause."at violence by protesters reduces public support for the protesters and can even erode support for the causes they support."

# data[].attributes.body
The best way to do a protest is by using our voices instead of violent protests. In Excerpt 1 it states, "But, Rabrenovic says, one thing is clear: in order for a movement to gain support and inspire lasting change, peace and consensus are essential." This quote shows that having peaceful protests are better because they can gain support and inspire people. In the other hand, people may say violent protests are better. But if you have a violent protest, you will not gain support from any source.

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt 1 the author claims that peaceful protest is better for example “There’s certainly more  evidence that peaceful protests are more successful because they build a wider coalition”.this means when there is no violence in a protest more people joins so they can support

# data[].attributes.body
In order to use our voices to ignite social change it's better to peacefully protest rather than violently protest because people might focus on the negative way more quicker than the positive. In excerpt #1 they explain how peacefully protesting can allow more people to support it and that inspires them to change.

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt 1 second paragraph it states “There’s certainly more evidence that peaceful protests are more successful because they build a wider coalition,.” This means Peaceful protest are more effective and have a bigger impact than some violent protest.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2 the author claims that violent protests don’t get the amount of support than if you do it non violently. She claims that violent protests reduces public support

# data[].attributes.body
The best way to protest is to not spread violence since that can reduce followers. In Excerpt # 2 the author claims that "violence by protesters reduces public support for the protesters and can even erode support for the causes they support." This means that people may think the violence will effect people's perspective on something at first but it may end up making people lose all their support and get less viewers.

# data[].attributes.body
In expert #2 the author write how violent protests don't ignite chance. The author writes how instead of violently protesting, you should protest peacefully. Article excerpt #2 states, "nonviolent movements were more effective at winning domestic and international support and at winning loyalty" This proves that peacefully protesting will not only gain you support but it will also gain followers that want to become part of the cause.

# data[].attributes.body
In excerpt 2, the author talks about how violence does not solve problems but cause them. Violence by protesters reduces public support . It has been statistically proven that nonviolent movements were more effective at winning as of supportively.

# data[].attributes.body
Violent protests may work at first but in future they can ruin any alliances that your country or state may need. When taking on a peaceful protest you can make great alliances that can help your business, company, country grow. The author hints that people would question violent protest and i agree they would because the effectiveness is not always good.We can use our voices to ignite and make change in a positive way.

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt #2 the author repeatedly proves by data that violent protests are not effective, the author explains that when people use violence in their protest they tend to lose followers and lose votes/ power in their movement, and if we look at peaceful protests, they tend to get votes, followers and supporters, and have the momentum to keep going

# data[].attributes.body
In Excerpt # 1 the author claims that people should question the effectiveness of violent protests. This means people may think that some violent protests may seem effective at first, but may not be as effective as some people think.