# data[].attributes.body
Out of the 30 environmental groups that oppose this construction, the most vital are the more than 200 Native Americans from various tribes that want to protect the history of the Standing Rock Sioux.

# data[].attributes.body
Dakota who believe the $3.7 billion pipeline project, which would move 470,000 barrels of crude oil a day across four states, would affect its drinking water supply and place downstream communities at risk of contamination from potential oil spills.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/us/dakota-pipeline-protests/

# data[].attributes.body
BISMARCK, N.D. — The head of a Texas company building the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline. http://www.twincities.com/2016/09/13/company-says-its-committed-to-building-dakota-access-pipeline/

# data[].attributes.body
The Dakota Access Pipeline will worsen climate change by pumping hundreds of thousands of gallons of shale oil to market daily. If completed, the DAPL would carry 470,000 - 570,000 barrels of Bakken shale oil to market. [2] The extracted oil, once processed, transported, and burned, would release 101.4 million metric tons of CO2 each year. This is the equivalent of the emissions from 29.5 coal plants or 21.4 million cars per year. [21] A peer-reviewed study found that a global rise in atmospheric ethane, a greenhouse gas, can be traced largely to hydraulic fracking in the North Dakota Bakken shale oil fields. [20] According to US Senator Bernie Sanders, "if we have any hope of avoiding the worst consequences of climate change, we should not be building new oil pipelines that lock us into burning fossil fuels for generations to come." [22]
http://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005331

# data[].attributes.body
The Dakota Access Pipeline threatens the water supply of the Standing Rock Sioux and millions of people downstream. The Dakota Access Pipeline was originally slated to cross under the Missouri river north of Bismarck, the state's capital. However, DAPL was re-routed south of the city, half-mile upstream from the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, due to concerns that a pipeline break could poison the city's water source. [15] A pipeline spill would imperil the drinking water of not just the Standing Rock Tribe, but also millions of people downstream. [14] The construction of the pipeline was fast-tracked using a process called Nationwide Permit No. 12, exempting it from environmental reviews required by the Clean Water Act, adding further concerns about the safety of the pipeline. [16]
http://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005331

# data[].attributes.body
It will create over 8,000 jobs
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/295216-why-we-must-build-the-dakota-access-pipeline-now

# data[].attributes.body
It will transport approximately 470,000 barrels per day with a capacity as high as 570,000 barrels per day or more.

# data[].attributes.body
The Dakota Access Pipeline will worsen climate change by pumping hundreds of thousands of gallons of shale oil to market daily. If completed, the DAPL would carry 470,000 - 570,000 barrels of Bakken shale oil to market. [2] The extracted oil, once processed, transported, and burned, would release 101.4 million metric tons of CO2 each year. This is the equivalent of the emissions from 29.5 coal plants or 21.4 million cars per year. [21] A peer-reviewed study found that a global rise in atmospheric ethane, a greenhouse gas, can be traced largely to hydraulic fracking in the North Dakota Bakken shale oil fields. [20] According to US Senator Bernie Sanders, "if we have any hope of avoiding the worst consequences of climate change, we should not be building new oil pipelines that lock us into burning fossil fuels for generations to come." [22]http://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005331

# data[].attributes.body
Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline will help the economy and create thousands of Jobs. Building the pipeline is expected to create 8,000 to 12,000 new jobs and pump money into industries that manufacture steel pipes and other related materials. [2] A Georgetown professor estimated that construction will add $129 million in annual tax revenue into local and state economies during construction. [27] Once the pipeline is operational, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois may earn $50 million annually in property taxes and $74 million in sales taxes. [27] The increased revenue would improve schools, roads, and emergency services in those areas. Moving oil by pipeline instead of railroad will ease transportation shortages for other major regional industries including agriculture. [2]
http://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005331

# data[].attributes.headline
Who is the corporation that fund the pipeline?

# data[].attributes.subject
Who is the corporation that fund the pipeline?

# data[].attributes.body
Construction for the pipeline will "destroy our burial sites, prayer sites and culturally significant artifacts," the Standing Rock Sioux tribe said.

# data[].attributes.body
Because its gonna make the profit for the companies but it will destroy the land and nature on the other hand.

# data[].attributes.body
“But the Army Corps has ignored all those laws and fast-tracked this massive project just to meet the pipeline’s aggressive construction schedule.

# data[].attributes.body
Pipeline companies say it is far safer to move oil and natural gas in an underground pipe than in rail cars or trucks, whttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/02/us/north-dakota-oil-pipeline-battle-whos-fighting-and-why.html?_r=0hich can crash and create huge fires.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1,172-mile Dakota Access Pipeline would connect oil rich- areas of North Dakota to Illinois, where the crude oil could the be transported to refineries on the Gulf Coast or East Coast

# data[].attributes.body
What happens if the pipeline is broken and oil is gonna spill everywhere. So if the oil is harming the environment like the water would become toxic and a lot of plants are gonna die.

# data[].attributes.body
Increased domestic crude oil production translates into greater energy independence for the United States.

http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/

# data[].attributes.body
Water is the most important thing which is keeping us alive.The Dakota pipeline is going under the North Dakota's lake.The negative thing about is that if it bursts and leaks it is going to be devastating.Not it is only going to effect mississispi river but all the small rivers going through it.But however by making the pipeline a lot of people are going to get jobs.It is going to be beneficial according to economy.

# data[].attributes.body
The pipeline would connect oil riches from North Dakota to Illinois, where the crude oil could then be transported refineries on the Gulf Coast or East Coast.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/us/dakota-pipeline-protests/

# data[].attributes.body
The $3 million project has caused a   oil-carrying train to explode in 2013
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
The pipeline wouldn't just be an economic boon, it would also significantly decrease U.S. reliance on foreign oil, the developer Energy Transfer Partners said. The pipeline would also help free up railways to transport "crops and other commodities currently constrained by crude oil cargos."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
It lowers the risk of human error by being more direct than roads.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation -- a vast underground deposit where Montana and North Dakota meet Canada -- southeast into South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois. http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
Because Oil isn't even a renewable source and having such easy access to it will only make it harder for people to chose renewable energy options.

# data[].attributes.body
its safer to transport oil in a
pipeline then with a train http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
It will make more jobs because it needs people to maintain.

# data[].attributes.body
1,172 miles: Length of Dakota Access Pipeline

30 inches: Width of the pipeline

470,000: Barrels of crude oil to be moved daily

374.3 million: Equivalent gallons of gasoline per day

Sources: Energy Access Partners, US Energy Information Administration
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
The pipeline will create over 8,000 jobs relating to mechanics, electricians, pipefitters, heavy equipment operators, and truckers. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/295216-why-we-must-build-the-dakota-access-pipeline-now

# data[].attributes.body
Protester from North Dakota believe that the  pipeline will go across four states which will affect their drinking water supply and place downstream communities at risk of contamination from oil spills

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/us/dakota-pipeline-protests/

# data[].attributes.body
Construction for the pipeline will destroy our burial sites.    http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
It's a $3.7 billion project that would cross four states and change the landscape of the US crude oil supply.  http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
From Illinois, the oil could go to markets and refineries across the Midwest, East Coast and Gulf Coast.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
The cost of the pipeline is expensive and would bring the US a even bigger debt. Or the people have to pay it.

# data[].attributes.body
the Dakota pipeline will help the economy and create thousands of jobs-http://www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005331

# data[].attributes.body
The pipeline will create local jobs during the construction

# data[].attributes.body
it cost $3.7 billion
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

# data[].attributes.body
It will reduce the amount of crude oil shipped by truck and by rail and increase the amount shipped by pipeline.
http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/resources/faq.html

# data[].attributes.body
It will go through the Mississippi River and will pollute their source of drinking water.  http://www.businessinsider.com/north-dakota-access-pipeline-protest-drinking-water-2016-10