# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBbtCvUGweo

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoon is showing people as bullets and someone reloading the gun. I take this as when people are shooting the gun they are ending a life, they are killing. This cartoon is putting murder into a different sense of not a shot but death.

# data[].attributes.body
This article stated Gary's views on many of the big issues. The article shows old and new stances he took, helping people see how he grew in the years he's been involved in government. Some of the things talked about on the article are abortion, the countries debt/economy, and Civil Rights. Gary believes that abortion should be up to the women and how developed the fetus is. Whereas he thinks we need to fix out debt and he will do this by vetoing any legislatures resulting in major expenses. Finally he believes in gay marriage and all rights for everyone of every race or color.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm

# data[].attributes.body
The articles I read involve how ironic it would be if and Ex-Presidents Wife happened to win. One of the articles I read showed how Bill Clinton could help Hillary in running our country. While others find it odd that the Clinton could be back in the White House. Then given her husbands past, some were worried. The other article was more of a summary of all the things Hillary and Bill have done together, to Bill's alleged scandals to the to Hillary's jobs int he government.

(I used the articles in it Billary Clinton and The First Dude)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
● Proud carrier of 'The Woman Card'

Donald Trump has accused Hillary Clinton of playing "the woman card" to win support for her candidacy. It's a charge she has embraced, telling cheering crowds to "deal me in."

● The Convention

Hillary Clinton accepts her party's nomination for president at the Democratic National Convention, which got off to a rocky start but ended with her becoming the first woman to top a major party's ticket. In her speech, she gave an optimistic assessment of the United States and warnings against electing Donald Trump.

● And Clinton's VP Pick Is ...

Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia.

● Education: Bernie-esque

The rising cost of higher education was a divisive issue in the Democratic primary. After conversations with Bernie Sanders, Clinton updated her plan to include free tuition for students from families earning up to $85,000 a year. The income level would rise to $125,000 by 2021, making the benefit available to an estimated 80% of families. She also wants a "time out" period that would give students who have already taken out loans a chance to refinance and lower their monthly payments.

When it became clear that Bernie Sanders would fall short of the Democratic nomination, he turned his attention to enshrining his liberal ideas in the party's platform. Sanders succeeded in several places, most notably calling for a $15-per-hour federal minimum wage that would be rise with inflation. Clinton had previously urged a $12-per-hour minimum, although she praised states like California and New York that went further.

● Who Is Clinton?

Hillary Rodham was born on Oct. 26, 1947. She grew up in a Chicago suburb and attended Wellesley College and Yale Law School. Hillary Clinton is married to former President Bill Clinton and has a daughter, Chelsea, and two grandchildren.

● Economy: Tougher Regulation

Clinton's ties to Wall Street donors have been a political headache during her primary battle with Bernie Sanders. She's pledged to toughen financial regulations, including new fees and rules for riskier trades. Clinton also wants a tax on high-frequency trading.

● From First Lady to Senator

Before becoming first lady in 1993, Clinton was an attorney and worked for the Children's Defense Fund among other causes. When her husband's term ended in 2001, she was elected U.S. senator for New York, serving until 2009. She was secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

● But Can You Trust Her?

Voters routinely tell pollsters they don't think Clinton is honest, making that one of her greatest political weaknesses. In fact, a June Gallup poll showed only a third of Americans find her trustworthy, placing her even with Donald Trump. It's an issue that Bernie Sanders used against her in the primary, insinuating that she was beholden to political donors, and Trump will likely hammer in the general election.

● Immigration: Pathway to Citizenship

Pushing a pathway to citizenship for immigrants who are in the country illegally is a key issue for Clinton, and one where she draws a stark contrast with Donald Trump. Clinton's proposal would resuscitate previous legislative efforts that stalled amid Republican opposition in Congress. She would also continue President Obama's executive actions that shielded millions of people from deportation proceedings.

● Historic First

Hillary Clinton embraced her status as the first woman presidential candidate from a major political party when she secured the Democratic nomination, delivering a speech that touched on the women's suffrage movement from a century ago. Now she's facing off with Donald Trump, whose track record of outrageous statements has been described as sexist and misogynist.

● Who's in the Clinton Coalition?

Barack Obama won two terms as president by building a diverse coalition that leaned heavily on black and Latino voters. Now Hillary Clinton will try to walk a similar path, building on her longstanding relationships with minority communities. In addition, Donald Trump 's harsh rhetoric on immigration is expected to push Latino voters more firmly into the Democratic corner.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Hillary Clinton was the first woman to top a major party's presidential ticket. A former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of State, the Democratic candidate fell short of her goal to become the 45th president of the United States. All things Trump

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how Donald Trump is not a normal candidate and in order win he will need to become more normal. Donald
Trump has said some very racist and quite dumb comments before, yet he is still getting votes. This article explains how if he normalizes a bit that he could win president, but it also explains how he got  over $1.9 billion in free media from his comments. Overall, the article explains how his abnormal remarks have helped him bt to win he needs to normailze.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Early this year, when a string of primary victories established Donald Trump as a viable presidential candidate and making sense of him became a matter of some national urgency, one of the more incisive assessments came from Newt Gingrich. At a closed-door meeting of the Republican State Leadership Committee in February, Gingrich argued that Trump was not a conservative but rather an "American nationalist" - one whose success suggested he had found "a formula worthy of study." He noted how Trump seemed bent on not just vanquishing his rivals but on eviscerating them. "He's the grizzly bear in the room," Gingrich said. "He's not normal."

There was a game-recognize-game aspect to this, coming from Gingrich, a genuinely eccentric politician who long ago sublimated his weirder tendencies into canny partisan street fighting. Trump, Gingrich said, needed to adapt similarly, tempering his instincts with the kind of restrained, hopeful messaging that might persuade a general-election audience. "If he and his team understand this," Gingrich said, "I suspect they will evolve rapidly."

It is difficult to remember now, not even half a year later, but for a moment this spring, after Trump cleared the Republican field, this was one of his opponents' greatest fears: that Trump - aided by a Republican Party mindful of its future and a political media seeking balanced campaign narratives - would remake himself as a disciplined, moderate candidate, and voters would believe it. "My campaign is not going to let Donald Trump try to normalize himself," Hillary Clinton vowed in May.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines "normalize" as "to make normal; to bring or return to a normal or standard condition or state." It's a word, then, as nebulous and conditional as the idea of normalcy itself - and one whose many meanings have been debated throughout a campaign season of unusual self-scrutiny within America's professional political class.

It was possible, in the early days of Trump's probable nomination, to imagine his general-election campaign unfolding as a radical experiment, a test of the political system's ability to coax a candidate who had shredded the country's civic norms back toward the median. But Trump, of course, would not be coaxed - and still, his poll numbers were, until recently, only a few points shy of where Mitt Romney, a candidate who was normal to the point of abnormality, stood at the same junctures in 2012.

Which has left us to consider a much darker question: whether our definition of "normal" politics has been irretrievably altered by Trump, rather than vice versa. "I think one of the greatest dangers of Donald Trump," Stuart Stevens, Romney's 2012 campaign manager, told CNN's Anderson Cooper in May, "is the idea that he might normalize a speech and an attitude that as a group in America we have decided is unacceptable." Whether or not Trump loses on Tuesday, it's likely that nearly half of American voters will have decided that what he represents isn't so unacceptable after all.

The hand-wringing over Trump's normalization began in earnest in the wake of the May 4 Indiana primary victory that drove the last of his serious Republican rivals from the race, which in retrospect was the moment his normalization became all but inevitable. The day after the primary, Vox's David Roberts predicted that within the "whole superstructure of U.S. politics built around two balanced sides" - the media, consultants, parties and the like - "there will be a tidal pull to normalize this election, to make it Coca-Cola versus Pepsi instead of Coca-Cola versus sewer water."

But since then, reporters have proved more blunt in their assessments of Trump, and many Republicans and conservative intellectuals more principled in their dissent, than the pessimists expected. The superstructure might not have fully escaped the gravitational forces that Roberts described, but it's not clear how much it could have once Trump appeared to have sealed the nomination. Could journalists defensibly refuse to cover, or Republicans defensibly refuse to nominate, the clear winner of a plurality of the party's primary votes? As MSNBC's Chris Hayes commiserated with the conservative talk-radio host Charlie Sykes last month, Trump "has marched through all the normal institutions we have, and in some ways that can't help but be normalizing."

As this has become clearer, the arguments over how, and by whom, Trump was normalized have become backward-looking ones. The Republican strategist Rick Wilson recently tweeted a Times graphic showing that Trump had received an estimated $1.9 billion worth of free media coverage - nearly nine times what Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio each received and two and a half times what Clinton received - with the words: "Never forget. There was no movement. The media handed him this on a plate."

Wilson's not wrong. A Shorenstein Center survey of eight major print and broadcast outlets (including The Times) found that between June and December 2015, Trump received more than a third of all the coverage devoted to Republican presidential candidates - more than Bush and Rubio combined. If this reflects Trump's status as, in the Shorenstein report's words, "arguably the first bona fide media-created presidential nominee," it also reflects a self-interest that media executives have at times not even bothered to conceal. "The money's rolling in, and this is fun," Les Moonves, chairman of CBS, said in February. "It's a terrible thing to say. But bring it on, Donald. Keep going." Perhaps no single person enabled, and benefited from, Trump's political ascent more than the president of CNN, Jeff Zucker, who as head of NBC Entertainment greenlit "The Apprentice" and in his current role is reportedly anticipating $100 million in extra profits thanks to CNN's wall-to-wall Trump coverage.

But then how do you explain Bernie Sanders? The Vermont senator won 22 states in the Democratic primary with less media coverage than either Bush or Rubio and more negative coverage than Trump. This year, the failings of the country's elites, political and otherwise, unleashed in both parties forces that were beyond those elites' control - but in only one party did they take the form of a political revolt that sanctions white nationalism, embraces conspiracism and openly considers armed resistance and extrajudicial imprisonment of its enemies. When Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois, who once described Trump as "too bigoted and racist" to be president, impugns the patriotic bona fides of his opponent, Tammy Duckworth, by invoking her Asian ancestry, it's absurd to pretend that these things came out of nowhere.

Republican leaders own the blame for assembling the constituency and, yes, normalizing the values that made Trump's nomination possible, and they will also own the responsibility for denormalizing Trumpism, for walking the country back from the ledge, after Nov. 8 - though how much chance they, or anybody, have of doing that is anybody's guess. Paul Ryan, the House speaker, saw his support within his party recede overnight in October, after he dared to even slightly distance himself from Trump (without rescinding his endorsement); in one subsequent poll, 51 percent of Republicans deemed him a "weak leader." Ryan had always implied that his endorsement of Trump had much to do with the prospects for advancing his own policy agenda in a policy-uninterested Trump administration. "We need to normalize these ideas," he told The Washington Post earlier this year. History will probably remember him and his party for normalizing something else.

Charles Homans is the politics editor for the magazine. He last wrote about conspiracy theories in the 2016 election.
Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of The New York Times Magazine delivered to your inbox every week.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 'Normalization' of Trump, and What Comes After

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Early this year, when a string of primary victories established Donald Trump as a viable presidential candidate and making sense of him became a matter of some national urgency, one of the more incisive assessments came from Newt Gingrich.

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoons shows us how Gary Johnson is unaware of one the many huge aspects of the US and Syria as countries since Aleppo is a city in Syria that is a huge part of the Syrian refugees.

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoon regards how many lies Hillary has said about anything from Benghazi to the emails.

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoon is regarding some comments Trump has  made in the past involving some stereotypes and crude comments. The cartoon shows how geographically Donald has viewed the world.