# data[].attributes.body
The topic is worth being investing because it is a big part of history which has been left a mystery for 50 years. Before i started investigating i thought documentary was better because i follow along and don't lose focus as much. im not sure yet.

# data[].attributes.headline
Using an article is the best way to present information about a subject. Articles allow you to read about something and learn about it. A documentry also helps such as a day in pompeii because it allows you to see the event. But reading about it give you more information such as what was around Pompeii such as gardens and how Pompeii was built. It’s spoke about how the day turned dark after the eruption and ask covered everything.
So this is why I think articles are better and giving information than documentaries because of the much more information that is given about the subject. 
showed the destruction of an island called Pompeii by a volcano called Using an article is the best way to present information about a subject. Articles allow you to read about something and learn about it. A documentry also helps such as a day in pompeii because it allows you to see the event. But reading about it give you more information such as what was around Pompeii such as gardens and how Pompeii was built. It’s spoke about how the day turned dark after the eruption and ask covered everything.
So this is why I think articles are better and giving information than documentaries because of the much more information that is given about the subject. 
 The topic of the article and documentary about Pompeii was worth being investigated because it shows and talks about the event. It’s shows what the day might of looked like in the documentary and see what may have happened on that day. The destruction of the city was so bad that nothing could have survived. The article talks about the day and the city. It spoke of how the city was built and how it was destroyed by the volcano. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Using an article is the best way to present information about a subject. Articles allow you to read about something and learn about it. A documentry also helps such as a day in pompeii because it allows you to see the event. But reading about it give you more information such as what was around Pompeii such as gardens and how Pompeii was built. It’s spoke about how the day turned dark after the eruption and ask covered everything.
So this is why I think articles are better and giving information than documentaries because of the much more information that is given about the subject. 
showed the destruction of an island called Pompeii by a volcano called Using an article is the best way to present information about a subject. Articles allow you to read about something and learn about it. A documentry also helps such as a day in pompeii because it allows you to see the event. But reading about it give you more information such as what was around Pompeii such as gardens and how Pompeii was built. It’s spoke about how the day turned dark after the eruption and ask covered everything.
So this is why I think articles are better and giving information than documentaries because of the much more information that is given about the subject. 
 The topic of the article and documentary about Pompeii was worth being investigated because it shows and talks about the event. It’s shows what the day might of looked like in the documentary and see what may have happened on that day. The destruction of the city was so bad that nothing could have survived. The article talks about the day and the city. It spoke of how the city was built and how it was destroyed by the volcano. 

# data[].attributes.body
this documentary is about people trying to prove that ET are real and show many examples :0

# data[].attributes.body
1.The topic of my documentary was worth being investigated because it was an important part in history, about a kinda sinful , i guess you could say. was destroyed.All the people who decided to ignore the possible danger, died.
2.I think the article was better at giving information because it told the story very well, it gave us some background knowledge as well. WE don't really exactly what happened in Pompeii but we know enough, the documentary seemed biased,like we don't really know what it looked like when it was burning,so it was more of a guess and it gave no information whatsoever.
3.The most challenging part of this assignment is reading the article, it was really long and I didn't know what some words meant, then towards the end,the last about 10 paragraphs were mostly about religion.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The topic of my documentary was worth being investigated because it gives information about the game of cat-and-mouse that corporations are playing with these young consumers

2. I think that the documentary was better at giving information because it told the story to its full extent. In the documentary they interviewed teen Ceili Lynch, even though she doesn't see it she is part of the game of cat-and-mouse that corporations are playing with these young consumers

3. The most challenging part of this assignment was honestly probably finding time to watch the documentary because it as long

# data[].attributes.body
1.The topic of my documentary was worth being investigated because it is still a mystery for the United States citizens and they want to know the truth about the moon landing, if it was real or fake.
2. After studying this project I realized that an article is the best way to give information because it has more facts, while a documentary is more biased, so you can learn more reliable information from article.
3. The most challenging part of this assignment was to make sure my work wasn't biased, and to make it reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
My topic on the article is worth being was worth being investigated because its one of Americas greatest mystery, the escape is very fascinating.The hardest part was time balance to do this assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The topic of my documentary, Escape from Alcatraz, was worth investigating because it has been a mystery for over half of a century. The mystery of the Escape is very important  to a lot of people, so this topic was worth being investigated to help inform those people.
2. Before I researched this topic, I believed that articles were better for presenting information. I believed this because the writing came from a person first hand. But, little did I think about that the writing could be biased or edited to make it become fictional. Whereas, you cannot change what people say in an interview, because when presented it won’t make sense.
3. The most challenging part of this assignment will be to make everything I write seem unbiased and agreeable to all audiences.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The topic of my documentary was worth investigating because it was an important time/event in history. A very luxurious city crumbled to the ground. Everyone who remained in the city and ignored possible danger died. It can be seen as a lesson to us today.
2.I think "The A Day in Pompeii" animation was a better way to give information. The animation explained the information more effectively because it used unbiased, accurate and reliable information. It also included detailed visuals. On the other hand, in “The Day the World Ended” article, some of the information was biased/opinionated.
3.The most challenging part of this assignment would probably be encountering difficult words that were in the article.

# data[].attributes.body
1. My documentary is important because it highlights an advancement in the physical human limit, by free soloing El Capitan, Alex created a milestone of physical human achievement.
2. In this case, a documentary would be the best way. Because it gives the audience a look at the sheer intensity of the climb.
3. the hardest part would be watching the documentary because i had to find time to watch it during the day.

# data[].attributes.body
1.My documentary was important because it ask the unexplainable and brings the idea that the world isn't as it seems right into our fingertips. The article is more specific to one topic, so I bleive the article is much easier to study and is not as time consuming.
3. Understanding what Im supposed to type about specificly.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The topic article and documentary is worth investigating because I think it is a big moment that people should know about . In the documentary it talks about how this escape was one of the biggest prison breaks in history because Alcatraz was known for being the most secure federal prison in America .

2. I think the documentary was a better source of information because it gives you a visual of what really happened and what the prison looked like. They also showed what their escape looked like and the things they used to do it . they also showed men trying to see what it felt like for the men to escape.

3. There wasn't really a challenging part to this assignment . Ot was just the Time managing part because the documentary was over a hour long

# data[].attributes.body
the topic of the eruption onto mount Vesuvius is an important topic because lives were lost.not only that those lives were lost in a tragic way like a volcano erupting all over the citizens of Pompeii and then leaving them there covered in ash and then it hardening and mumifiing them. before studying this topic i always thought articles are better that documentary just because you can go at your own pace instead of going at someone else's   the most cahallengeing part of this assignment was watching the documentery.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't know what i'm doing so bare with me here, my documentary was worth being told and my resource was reliable

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the topic of my documentary, which was Amelia Earhart, was worth investigating because I think the past couple of generations don't really realize how much Amelia Earhart did for women during that time. And the search for her plane and what happened to her is arguably one of the best unsolved mysteries of the 20th and 21st centuries.
I think that the documentary was better at giving information because it had the ability to tell the story to it's fullest extent. The story of Amelia Earhart has too much depth to be told in a three page article. I think if you want to tell the story of Amelia Earhart, you have to do it justice. And because of the circumstances of her disappearance, it's a better story to learn about first hand by seeing.
I don't think the assignment was particularly challenging, but it take up a lot of time depending on what topic you chose. For Amelia Earhart, the documentary was around an hour and a half long so it took a lot of time out of your day when you could be working on other assignments.

# data[].attributes.headline
The topic of my documentary worth investigating because it is interesting.i dont think there is a better resource between a documentary and an article because they both contain information about the topic and i just dont think that one is better than the other. The most challenging part of this assignment was watching the hour long documentary, everything was really easy.

# data[].attributes.subject
The topic of my documentary worth investigating because it is interesting.i dont think there is a better resource between a documentary and an article because they both contain information about the topic and i just dont think that one is better than the other. The most challenging part of this assignment was watching the hour long documentary, everything was really easy.

# data[].attributes.body
1.because it is a question people still wonder? Did they survive?
2.documentary; I learn better by watching something I remember it better
3. maybe just the paragraphs

# data[].attributes.body
the topic of my documentary is worth being investigated because people who are mentally or physically disabled can still do things like solving cubes, they have talents that other people don't have. I think that that article was more boring because it did not show us how fast their records were and how creative or intelligent the people can be.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The topic of Pompeii is worth investigating because it tells us about what happened.
2. I think the article was better because the documentary didn't give a lot of information.
3. The most challenging part of the assignment was writing the paragraphs.

# data[].attributes.body
the article and documentary was worth being told because it was the biggest escape and everyone should know how they did it it like how the currents had to be specific to do it like it should be common knowledge. 2 i thought documentary cause its more engaging and less boring and i was right is was way better. 3 nothing was to hard finding reasons to support cause its just weird to pull out evidence from an article about one thing and explain why articles or documentaries aren't good you know?

# data[].attributes.body
It was about how aliens could have created earth and like the in mexico and it is conected to the brenmuda triangle and so it have the same afecect but miltary sent out a missle and it was pulled into the zone of slienes it talke about the slient zone and how it had magnetic forces that pull in things like meteors and how they are more like metal and how the ancient myans and anizaiz where tradeing info about the zone of silence to where they found out that it was like magnetic zone and it turn everything off.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The topic of the youngest person to ever sail around the world by themself was worth being investigating because it was a record breaking, historic voyage. She will go done is history as the youngest person to ever sail round the world alone.
2. I believe the documentary was the better way to give info nation because Laura filmed it herself so it is a first hand account of the journey.
3. The most challenging part of the assignment was the evaluation assignment because I had to organize all my thoughts into an extended response question.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Documentary and article about Pompeii was worth being told because it was a massive catastrophic event witch effected thousands of lives.
2. After studying my event more deeply I came to the conclusion that the article was the better choice for reliable and factual information. i believe this because it gives a lot more depth into the topic, as well as more event dates and times.
3. the hardest part of the assignment for me was finding the audience, this was challenging for me because the way the article was made could have gone for several ages, but i came to the conclusion that it was made for a mature audience of students after the second read through.

# data[].attributes.headline
1- I think that "6 Native American Basketball Facts, Inspired by Louisville's Star Sisters" was a topic worth investigating because i think that no one in this world should be treated as they are less than others because of their skin color... Thats something that people still struggle with today and I think our society needs to learn to grow up and treat everyone like they are an actual person. 

# data[].attributes.subject
1- I think that "6 Native American Basketball Facts, Inspired by Louisville's Star Sisters" was a topic worth investigating because i think that no one in this world should be treated as they are less than others because of their skin color... Thats something that people still struggle with today and I think our society needs to learn to grow up and treat everyone like they are an actual person. 

# data[].attributes.body
the 2- After I stuidied this topic, I found that to me the article was more helpful. I think this because with documentarys they are very long and a lot of the time (if not all) theres always extra information that you really dont NEED to know. Articles, on the other hand, only give you the important stuff and some other side details but they mainly get straight to the point.
3- the most challenging part of thsi assignment to me was to just know that theres still so many people putting up with racism and only for the color of their skin? Theres too many immature people in this world today.

# data[].attributes.body
1. "How Animals Survive in Cold Conditions
Science of the Cold" was worth reading because it talked about how animals survive in the cold. It also told me how cold it can get. Finally it told me why animals are in Antarctica and the Arctic.
2. The article was better than the documentary because it was much easier for me to find information. where with the documentary i had to continue watching to find certain information.
3. Understanding the question.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that Escape from Alcatraz was worth investigating because the prison is a very private and heavily guarded prison which makes it very hard to escape from. So when people try to escape it is a very big deal, especially when their oldies aren’t found.
2. I think that reading an article was better than watching a documentary because it was a lot easier for me to see the information and know exactly what I’m reading. But I do think that watching the documentary was fun.
3. The most challenging part was trying to keep up with documentary because it didn’t go at the pace i wanted.

# data[].attributes.body
1. the moon landing was fake it is worth being investigated because it is strange how america received very clear pictures through the huge space helmets
2. in the recording of the moon landing you hear someone say speak after many seconds of silence
3. someone on NASA was telling many people he thought the mission to the moon wouldn't happen then him and two other people died in a terrible "accident" after he was calling mission a lemon

# data[].attributes.body
1. Amelia Earhart's disappearance is worth investigating because she was an important person in woman's rights. Even though people doubted her she still showed them off and she stood up for what she believed in and was driven to make the world a better place for everyone!      2.I believe the documentary gave better information. The documentary gave so much more information and facts and most of it the article didn't even mention. The article gave a profile of her, like where she was born when she started flying all that. The documentary did mention that but it mentioned when she started flying and pictures and videos and also in the documentary they were going on a hunt for her bones or artifacts so it was very interesting!                 3.The hardest part was having to wait and see if they found her or her plane in the documentary (it was 1 hour and 35 mins)

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that Alcatraz  is worth being investigated because it talks about how hard it was to escape and that no one ever has before. There was an attempt but it didn't work two of the guys where caught and put back into the but no one knows if the third guy survived or not.

2. I think that the article gave more information to my topic and how hard it is to escape Alcatraz.

3.The most challenging part for me was reading cause it is hard to focus sometimes.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I thought the topic of Alcatraz was worth being investigated because shows some really cool things and explained how hard it was to escape. It also showed how one group of people escaped.

2. I think that the article gave me more information on the place and how people couldn't escape.

3. the most challenging thing was finding information in the documentary compared to the article.

# data[].attributes.headline
Claire Ziegler       1.I thought free solo was worth being investigated because it is about free soloing which is scary enough climbing something small but Alex honolld climbing something so tall its just amazing 

# data[].attributes.subject
Claire Ziegler       1.I thought free solo was worth being investigated because it is about free soloing which is scary enough climbing something small but Alex honolld climbing something so tall its just amazing 

# data[].attributes.body
2.i think the documentary is the better way to get information
3. the hardest part would be deciding about the article or the documentary

# data[].attributes.body
1.I thought the topic of Free Solo was worth investigating because it provides a pretty cool story and very like nerve racking climbing up a huge cliff without stuff holding you up.

2.I think that the article gave me more information but the documentary was a lot more enjoyable.

3.The most challenging thing to do was watch a huge long documentary and try to find stuff about it because it didn't talk much.

# data[].attributes.body
1. * Insert the topic of my documentary* was worth being investigated because...
2. After studying the topic I think the best way to give information is...
3. The most challenging part of this assignment was...

# data[].attributes.headline
Questions to answer (Answer them in your own Padlet post!Do not reply to this one!)

# data[].attributes.subject
Questions to answer (Answer them in your own Padlet post!Do not reply to this one!)

# data[].attributes.body
1. 1. Why is the topic of your documentary worth investigating?

2. 2. After you began studying this topic, which do you think is a better way to give information: documentary or article? Why?

3. 3. What was the most challenging part of this assignment?

# data[].attributes.body
1. free solo is worth being investagated because you can see some one climb a huge moutain with out a rope. you feel like you are there even though you are not.

2. The documentary was better because you can get a better visuallook at him climbing.

3. The most challenging part is is picking one or the other because they were both good but the documentary was better"

# data[].attributes.body
1. Amelia Earhart's disappearance is worth investigating because she was an important person in woman's rights. Even though people doubted her she still showed them off and she stood up for what she believed in and was driven to make the world a better place for everyone!      2.I believe the documentary gave better information. The documentary gave so much more information and facts and most of it the article didn't even mention. The article gave a profile of her, like where she was born when she started flying all that. The documentary did mention that but it mentioned when she started flying and pictures and videos and also in the documentary they were going on a hunt for her bones or artifacts so it was very interesting!                 3.The hardest part was having to wait and see if they found her or her plane in the documentary (it was 1 hour and 35 mins)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Pompeii is worth investigated because it is an interesting topic of how volcanoes are so subtle and then so destructive, and humans sometimes dont even notice it. RH

2. The article was a better way to give the information because it actually explained what was happening as the eruption progressed and the aftermath, where the documentary just showed various stages of buildings being destroyed.

3. The most challenging part of this was determining the meaning of the documentary, since there were no words, just times and short clips of what the animator believed happened.