# data[].attributes.body
"Ban DMHO:Dihydrogen Monoxide"
http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html
I know that this source is unreliable because it is biased against the topic and has no support at all. Firstly, dihydrogen monoxide is just another fancy name for water, and water doesn't cause any damage. For example, the article states that "Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today." Even though this statement is true, it is creating the illusion that this substance is bad and pollutes the globe. It takes a biased standpoint and tries to falsify a problem that doesn't even exist. Also, the citations and the reference provided are not even present, which means that there is no evidence what the author wrote is true.

From this activity, I learned how to evaluate sources and their credibility. It gave me the insight that not all the things on the internet are true, and there are many false facts that try to grab our attention and change our viewpoints. It is best that in the future, we should evaluate the different components that make up a piece of writing and ensure that they are reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ban DHMO: Dihydrogen Monocide
http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html
i know that this website is not reliable because it does not meet any of the criteria for a credible website. the publication date is not specifically mentioned, which means that it might be dated information; the reputation of the publication is not clear, which means that either it is something totally made-up and random, or the publication's reputation is horrible. secondly, it does not haveany credibility: its url does not look "legit" and author cannot be identified. Thirdly, the piece of writing has poor accuracy: it uses pure logic without any backing evidence to describe the substance "dihydrogen-monoxide"--two problems with that: first, since the article is introducing a new problem to the readers, it must use evidence to back the arguments up, or else it will just be pure mythology; secondly, dihydrogen-monoxide is basically just water, water is not poisonous or will kill people as the article describes, so therefore it is containing false information. Furthermore, it included a quote from ex-president Obama saying ridiculous ideas, so therefore this source is totally not credible.

2. What is the significance of this activity?
the significance of this activity is that it teaches us how to identify reliable sources and gives us the opportunity to practice researching and determining whether a source is credible or not. By participating in this activity, we can input our knowledge from the class to the real world and apply it on different sources and exercises. Practice makes perfect: only by applying our knowledge about determining a source's credibility to the real world, we can be more familiar with the process and use it in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
"Ban Dihydrate Monoxide!"
URl:http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html
This is not a reliable website because firstly, there are no sources that are credible sited on the page, so we know that they didn't use proper evidence to back up their article. In fact, the links are literally made up or mon-existant because nothing that has to do with the topic pops up on it or it just never loads. There is also no author listed on the bottom of the page. Secondly, the looks of the page is very outdated and crude, showing that the developer did not put much effort into it and it is more likely just a joke for fun. The date on the bottom is also very old, showing that it is outdated information. Lastly, the fact that Dihydrate Monoxide is water makes this sound even more like a joke. After the reader figures this out, it is clear that everything listed is false. Therefore, this website is very unreliable.

# data[].attributes.body
"Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!"
link: http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html
This website is extremely unreliable. Firstly, the formatting and the color of the website looks very unappealing, which is not the case in most reliable sources. Content-wise, I'm pretty sure"Dihydrogen monoxide" is water. The author changes "Water" into "Dihydrogen monoxide" to trick people into believing that it is actually a dangerous and destructive substance, as not many people heard of the name before. This source is also biased and is trying to persuade. The motto "we must stop Iran and North Korea from stockpiling DHMO before it is too late!" shows that the point of this article is to create negative feelings towards these countries and create the idea that they are storing a dangerous substance. To prove that "Dihydrogen monoxide" is a dangerous substance, the author listed several pieces of evidence. However, the evidence is one-sided and does not show the positives of water. For example, "May cause severe burns." Anything may cause severe burns when heated to high temperatures. The effects of "Dihydrogen monoxide" listed in the article portrays it as extremely dangerous, further supporting their point. Finally, the sources listed at the bottom of the page does not actually exist. When the links are pasted, none can be opened. This shows that this website is not supported by evidence. Therefore, it is unreliable

# data[].attributes.body
"Ban DHMO:Dihydrogen Monoxide"
http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html
This website is very unreliable, just by viewing its format and title. At the very first glance, this article has no author name and no publication date. The first sentence at the top states "We must stop Iran and North Korea from stockpiling DHMO before it is too late!" This sentence is biased because of political relationships between the US and Iran and North Korea, which is a sensitive topic. It also overuses the exclaimation mark, making the purpose of this resource more of persuading rather than informing, For accuracy, there are spelling errors like "Barack Obema" and numerous sentence fragments. The whole "article" is arranged in a bullet-point way, making reading quite inconvenient. In comparison to a reliable resource, which often has a paragraph style, a clear title, and citations, this resource is very informal. The logic of the resource is fine, but it is based on unreliable sources. One problem is that "dihydrogen monoxide" is obviously just "H₂O", which is water. Anybody with normal intellect would know that banning water is impossible, and that the article is just trying to exaggerate false information. Last, there are no citations or outside sources found to support the article, further proving that it is made up. The further reading section contains out-of-date articles from the 1940s and 60s. All in all, this resource is very unreliable, and one should not use it when doing research.
_______________________________________________
This activity is important because it teaches us how to evaluate whether an article that we found online is reliable or not by using CARS. Since we are writing an academic research paper, we must use accurate information. Obviously, this kind of website is not reliable at the first glance, but looking at other websites, for example a news website, we need to be careful of biases. Just because CNN is well-known does not necessarily mean that it is a hundred percent unbiased. Therefore, it is really important for us to be able to find the correct resources and write the most sophisticated, precise research paper.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"We must stop Iran and North Korea from stockpiling DHMO before it is too late!"
Secretary of State Jim Kerry: United Nations, New York (June 17, 2014)

Coalition to Ban DHMO: http://BanDHMO.org

"The United States will not weaponize DHMO as long as I am President. You have my solemn word on this.
Beware of Conservative Republicans though. Some of them are pro clean DHMO."
President Barack Obema: Washington, DC (January, 2010)

The Invisible Killer
Dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO) is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and sickens over 4 billion and kills over 2 million people every year (United Nations World Health Organization, 2008: www.WHO.Int). Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide do not end there. Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death.
"Recreational DHMO illness can have a significant impact on public health not only
because of the severity of the illness but also the number of people who die."
Department of Health, State Of Washington (www2.DOH.WA.Gov)

Dihydrogen monoxide:

is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.

contributes to the "greenhouse effect."

may cause severe burns.

contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.

accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.

may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.

has been found in excised tumors of all terminal cancer patients.

has always been found to be a major cause of drownings in private swimming pools.

contamination has been found in all floodwaters where death has occurred.

has been found in the rains in violent thunderstorms that contain destructive lightning.

in crystalline form has been implicated in many ship sinkings.

in crystalline and liquid form has been a major factor in plane crashes.

changing from crystalline to liquid is a leading cause of the destruction of arctic ice and glaciers.

Contamination Is Reaching Epidemic Proportions!
Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today. But the pollution is global, and DHMO contamination has even been found in Antarctic ice, all the world's oceans and even in mother's milk in developing nations. DHMO has caused millions of dollars of property damage in the midwest, Nile and Mississippi River valley and recently in California. DHMO contamination is even found in most cells in the human body!
Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:

as an industrial solvent and coolant.

in nuclear power plants.

in the production of styrofoam.

as a fire retardant.

in many forms of cruel animal research.

in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.

as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

to dissolve medicines before giving them to children and older adults.

Companies dump pure waste DHMO into rivers and the ocean, and nothing can be done to stop them because this practice is still legal. The impact on wildlife isextreme, and we cannot afford to ignore it any longer!
"Se fossi uno scommettitore, vorrei chiedo se la Santa Sede contiene DHMO - dai, che uno scherzo - ottenerlo? Vedere, mare ??
Ehi, Don, io non sono stupido! Sono un papa immaginario. Stiamo parlando di vecchia acqua normale semplice!"
Pope Jon XXXVII: Iguana, Mexico (May, 2005)

The Horror Must Be Stopped!
The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation." In fact, the Navy and other military organizations are conducting experiments with DHMO, and designing multi-billion dollar devices to control and utilize it duringwarfare situations. Hundreds of military research facilities receive millions of tons of pure DHMO through a highly sophisticated underground distribution network daily. Many facilities store large quantities for later use. Many municipalities also have DHMO storage facilities.

It's Not Too Late!

Act NOW to prevent further contamination . Find out more about this dangerous chemical. What you don't know can hurt you and others throughout the world. Write to your Congress person and Senator. Urge them to Ban Dihydrogen MonoxideNOW!
Brought to you by the Coalition to Ban DHMO: http://BanDHMO.org.
Further Reading:

Anderson, A., & Olson, L. (1961). DHMO: The Untold Story. Chicago: Paladium Press.

________. (2007, April 1). Ahmadinejad: A rain of DHMO if Isreal attacks nuclear facilities. (Editorial).The Wall Street Journal.

Cavuto, N.J. (2003, February 12). DHMO: Was this Saddam Hussein's 'Weapon of Mass Destruction'?MSNBC.

Descy, D.E. (2015, February 31). Hitler's DHMO research (1934-1944) and his attempt to flood the market. Berlin: Garantierte und ehrliche Forschung. Wir schwren, alles, was heilig und richtig ist Journal.

Faiano, P. (2006). Weaponizing DHMO. International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry.

O'Boyle, J. (1997, January 7). DiHydrogen Monoxide: What We Don't Know Can Hurt Us!.USA Today.

Win-Tang Woo, K. (1948). DHMO: Molecular and Constancy Theory. London:Oxford University Press.

Other Web Sites for more information:

<URL:http://BanDHMO.org>
Updated: January 15 and June 15 each year and other times as required.
© BanDHMO.org, 1995-2xxx All rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
dhmo dihydrogen monoxide dhmo research dental cigna water dihydrogen monoxide 
ban dhmo ban water cigna dihydrogen monoxide hoax dhmo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Coalition to Ban DHMO Dihydrogen Monoxide Homepage

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"We must stop Iran and North Korea from stockpiling DHMO before it is too late!" Secretary of State Jim Kerry: United Nations, New York (June 17, 2014) Coalition to Ban DHMO: http://BanDHMO.org "The United States will not weaponize DHMO as long as I am President. You have my solemn word on this.

# data[].attributes.body
"Tucker Carlson: Lockdowns are killing our children, and everyone knows it -- including teachers' unions" The link is attached, https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-coronavirus-lockdowns-killing-children-teachers-unions
Almost automatically when readers read this article they can that it isn't reliable. First off, the article is purely opinion which cannot be held as a trustworthy source, as throughout the article Carlson is constantly blaming problems on democrats and people instead on informing the general audience on the issue. Although there aren't any grammar mistakes, there are multiple examples of misinterpretation of data. For instance, Carlson writes after blaming democrats,  "If you went to their (NY times) website Tuesday, you would have found this headline: "The U.S. is Edging Toward Normal, Alarming Some Officials." Yes, some officials are alarmed you might be able to go outside without getting their approval first. They're worried your kids might get an education. (You'll notice the Times interviewed officials rather than parents.)" This statement is completely baffling, and is totally irrelevant to the topic. Furthermore, the article name is obviously click-bait for anti-maskers and COVID deniers.
2. From this activity, I learned how important it was to understand how to find reliable sources. Moreover, I also learned the important lessons that although a source or news channel may have a good reputation, it doesn't mean that their work is unbiased and reliable. The significant of this activity is to help many students realize how many biases are written into the articles we are reading, without us even noticing. We took the time in class and at home to do this activity to help us correctly identify reliable sources and see examples of sources that aren't reliable.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It wasn't so long ago that our taste-making class decided that Andrew Cuomo of New York was the single greatest governor in American history. Reporters who covered him didn't ask Cuomo questions so much as swoon in his presence. The people who pass out Emmys gave him an award just for holding press conferences. Over on CNN, Jeff Zucker handed the governor a recurring spot on his little brother's TV show. For a moment, Andrew Cuomo was THE man, a steely mixture of Abraham Lincoln and Paulie Walnuts who was just what America needed in a crisis.

These days, no one seems to like Andrew Cuomo anymore. He's been "#MeToo-ed" for saying naughty things to women. Even Andrew Cuomo's former friends are treating him like Harvey Weinstein. At this point, it's hard to imagine that Andrew Cuomo will be governor of New York for much longer.

No one who knows Andrew Cuomo could be shocked by any of this. For more than a decade, he has been an awful governor of New York for reasons that have nothing to do with sexual harassment, bad as that is. Two years ago, Joseph Percoco -- one of Cuomo's closest aides and someone he described as like a brother -- went to federal prison for six years for bribery. Last year. Cuomo famously caused the lonely deaths of thousands of elderly New Yorkers locked away in nursing homes.

From day one, Andrew Cuomo has been a disaster for the state of New York, and yet the Democratic establishment has relentlessly defended him. Why? Because he helped them maintain what they want most of all: Power.
AMAZON STILL LISTS CUOMO BOOK TOUTING COVID RESPONSE AS 'EDITORS' PICK' DESPITE NURSING HOME SCANDAL
Nothing has made elected Democrats more powerful than the COVID pandemic. They began as politicians, but lockdowns made them God. As early as last April, Cuomo declared that corona law would last forever. "I don't think we get back to normal," he said then. "I think we get to a new normal."

At the time, there was no vaccine for the coronavirus, so many people reluctantly accepted Cuomo's prediction. But now, 11 months later, we have multiple coronavirus vaccines. Infection rates are falling, along with deaths. Yet, the message from the Democratic establishment has not changed: Your life is never going back to normal.

The media, rather than question this, amplify the message for their own reasons. When Democratic politicians become more powerful, so do their spokesmen in the press. " Stop Expecting Life to Go Back to Normal Next Year," read a New York Times piece from September. A month later, the paper ran a story with this headline: " The First COVID Vaccine Will Not Make Life Normal Again."

The fact that people might live normal lives deeply bothers The New York Times, apparently. If you went to their website Tuesday, you would have found this headline: " The U.S. is Edging Toward Normal, Alarming Some Officials." Yes, some officials are alarmed you might be able to go outside without getting their approval first. They're worried your kids might get an education. (You'll notice the Times interviewed officials rather than parents.)
EMOTIONAL LAWRENCE JONES DISCUSSES IMPACT OF REMOTE LEARNING ON MINORITY KIDS
A new analysis by Fair Health shows just how destructive the lockdowns have been. The survey didn't rely on questions. Instead, it looked at the data -- billions of health care records and insurance claims. Here's the top line conclusion: "The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on mental health, particularly that of young people ... School closures, having to learn remotely and isolating from friends due to social distancing have been sources of stress and loneliness."

How bad is it? This bad: Among children aged 13 to 18, insurance claims for intentional self-harm were up 90% in March of 2020 compared to the previous year. The next month, self-harm cases rose by nearly 100%. Claims for medical help related to drug overdoses went up 95% in March and 113% in April. Those numbers remained elevated through the fall.

Why was this happening? Mental illness caused by coronavirus lockdowns: "For the age group 13-18, in April 2020, insurance claims for generalized anxiety disorder increased 93.6[%] as a percentage of all medical claim lines over April 2019, while major depressive disorder claim lines increased 83.9[%] and adjustment disorder claim lines 89.7[%]."

Thanks to the coronavirus lockdowns, children are 10 times more likely to die from suicide than from the coronavirus they're meant to be protected from. That is the new normal that Andrew Cuomo and The New York Times are working to make permanent in this country. If the teachers' unions have their way, your child may die of a drug overdose before going back to school, and if you complain about that, you're a White supremacist. That was the explicit message Monday from the president of the Los Angeles teachers' union.
LOS ANGELES TEACHERS' UNION REFUSES TO BUDGET ON SCHOOL REOPENINGS: 'STRUCTURAL RACISM' CECILY MYART-CRUZ: Some voices are being allowed to speak louder than others. We have to call out the privilege behind the largely White wealthy parents driving the push for a rushed return. Their experience of this pandemic is not our students' families' experiences.
The first thing you'll find in the official biography of Cecily Myart-Cruz is the fact that she is the "first woman of color in the union's 50-year history." So Myart-Cruz believes her skin color is a job qualification, somehow, maybe the most important one she has. She's saying things like the above because she's hoping you won't notice that she's incompetent and her positions don't make any sense at all, especially the idea that poor families benefit the most from closing public schools.

In fact, poor families need their kids back in school more than anyone else because they don't have alternatives. Most of the "White wealthy parents" Cecily Myart-Cruz is attacking don't use the public schools precisely because they don't want their kids anywhere near lazy mediocrities like her. Parents with privilege have options and they run away.

Who are these privileged people we're talking about? They're people like Matt Meyer, the head of the Berkeley teachers' union. Meyer would tell you, if you talk to him, that he's a progressive. Like so many other pasty, middle-aged Trustafarians, he's got earrings and blond dreadlocks. But the truth is, Matt Meyer doesn't want his daughter near the likes of Cecily Myart-Cruz, either. So he sends his little girl to private school. We know this not because The New York Times did an exposé on it (though maybe they should, given that Matt Meyer is the personification of the White privilege they're so worried about).
TEACHERS' UNION HEAD WHO LED CHARGE TO CLOSE SCHOOLS SEEN DROPPING DAUGHTER OFF AT IN-PERSON PRESCHOOL
No, we know this instead because an anonymous group of parents called Guerilla Momz photographed Matt dropping his child off at private school. Here's that same Matt Meyer back in January insisting that your children can't go back to school because they can't be trusted to keep their masks on.
MATT MEYER: Real-life children do not keep their masks on, they do not keep distance from each other or their teachers. Given the realities of working with real children in person, we need to account for the inevitable lapses and risk mitigation practices by choosing a standard of lower transmission for reopening. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
What Meyer doesn't mention is that there is virtually no risk to anyone in sending children back to school, and there never has been. The science couldn't be clearer. That's why, when he doesn't think you're watching, Matt Meyer makes certain his own child gets the in-person instruction she needs.

He doesn't want her growing up to be a drug addict like your kids.
This article is adapted from Tucker Carlson's opening commentary on the March 2, 2021 edition of "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tucker Carlson: Lockdowns are killing our children, and everyone knows it -- including teachers' unions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It wasn't so long ago that our taste-making class decided that Andrew Cuomo of New York was the single greatest governor in American history. Reporters who covered him didn't ask Cuomo questions so much as swoon in his presence. The people who pass out Emmys gave him an award just for holding press conferences.

# data[].attributes.body
"Woman who went missing 2 years ago discovered at sea"
https://nypost.com/2020/09/29/woman-missing-for-2-years-discovered-alive-at-sea/

I know this website is not reliable. Most of the author's articles are "for fun" and have a lack of evidence, such as "Tic Tok's color personality test" or "Flight grounded after grumpy cat attacks pilot." Such articles suggests that the author does not have much credibility and trustworthiness. The evidences of the article are mostly presented through the woman's own words, which is not credible nor accurate since there can be biases or lies in the woman's words. Also, though the article is published in other websites, those websites are not reliable as well, such as Fox and The Sun. Many websites online also suggests that New York Post itself may contain biases and is not very reliable. Finally, the content itself is a bit unreasonable, as it says that the woman was missing for 2 years and was floating above the water for 8 hours before she  was rescued.

This activity requires students to identify the credibility of websites, which prepares the students for future researches. After this activity students may be more familiar in identifying credible sources and be able to find useful, accurate, and reliable sources.

# data[].attributes.body
The title of the article is:

"Tucker Carlson: Lockdowns are killing our children, and everyone knows it -- including teachers' unions". Link https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-coronavirus-lockdowns-killing-children-teachers-unions. I know that this article is unreliable because, for one, the language in this article is utterly not trustworthy. The author included an enormous amount of personal opinions. There are many attacks on other people in this article. Also, the author Tucker Carlson does not have quite a good reputation, being someone who was ruled as not credible by judges. The accuracy in this article is questionable. Evidence that the author mentions are from untrustworthy organizations like "Guerilla Momz" and such. The author's reasoning is also completely, mind-blowingly non-reliable. There are multiple logical fallacies that one can find in this article. Even though there seems to not be any grammar mistakes, the rest of the content is enough to make the credibility of this article become downgraded by a lot. I learned that not all famous people who work for famous news channels like Fox News are reliable people, and that everyone should think before they accept an opinion from someone.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ban DHMO: Dihydrogen Monoxide

Link: http://descy.50megs.com/descy/webcred/webcred/dhmo.html

I know this website is unreliable because it has no identified author, lack of evidence, and a biased tone. First of all, the website does not identify its author. Without knowing the name and background of the author, the author might be anyone. The author could be someone completely unfamiliar with the topic, decreasing the credibility of the written information. Second of all, the website does not use any solid evidence to back up the author’s opinion. The author did use some quotes by famous people, but these quotes are false and reliable. For example, the author quoted Barack “Obema”’s words of “The United States will not weaponize DHMO as long as I am President. You have my solemn word on this. Beware of Conservative Republicans though. Some of them are pro clean DHMO.” There are several mistakes in this quote. The most apparent error is that Obama is spelled wrong as “Obema”. Another error is that Obama never said this quote, meaning that the author is trying to spread false information. The most serious problem with this website is that dihydrogen monoxide is actually just another name for “water”. The author is taking part in a parody called the “dihydrogen monoxide hoax”, which plays into chemophobia and often calls dihydrogen as dangerous and lists some of water’s properties in a very alarming way. Third of all, this website uses a very biased and opinionated tone. The author only addresses the problems of DHMO, while avoids mentioning the positive qualities of it. All of the quotes are edited to fit the author’s purpose and are unaccurate.

2. This activity allows students to think about what defines credibility. By participating in this activity, students would be able to think and reflect on the characteristics of a certain source that made it trustworthy and accurate. It would better prepare students for the process of finding reliable sources that would take place when students start researching their topic.

# data[].attributes.body
"Never Forget the Lies About Air Defense Failures on 9/11"

https://911truth.org/never-forget-911-air-defense-failures/
I know this website is not reliable. Even though readers are able to view the author, Kevin Ryan, the author has no credibility and his introduction is written informally. The author uses vague words in the article and does not explain things clearly. The article is strongly biased and has a strong opinion on how details of the 9/11 attack are lies. The author seems to have logical reasoning, but however he uses uncredible sources of evidence to support his claim. For example, the author quotes a comment made by a random internet user called "Stickdog" in the website "Democratic Underground". Other pieces of evidence are made up and leads to the webpage "URL not found". The whole article was first published as a blog, which makes it even more unreliable.
From this activity, I learned how to identify and correctly use reliable sources. Some sources seemed credible, but when you dig deeper, many flaws appear. These articles should definately not be used in research papers.

# data[].attributes.body
"3 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD STOP EATING PEANUT BUTTER CUPS!"

https://www.davidwolfe.com/3-reasons-stop-eating-peanut-butter-cups/

This article is pretty credible, because there are ways to contact the author, no grammar mistakes, an appealing look, and a good amount of background info with sources. The author has included his name, Facebook, Email, and Twitter. Other than means of contact, the website has several privacy policies, and includes ways that you can sign up to post comments. The overall look of the website shows that it is well done and organized, unlike the drab and messy look of unreliable websites. In addition, the author also includes his sources, showing the readers where he got his information.  In this very article, there are no spelling or grammar mistakes. The author gives us a good amount of background info on his topic, and clearly states why peanut butter cups are bad for you. Knowing whether sources are credible or not is a huge part of research. Understanding whether the info you are getting is real or not can determine whether your research is actually true. This skill is very much needed writing my research paper, and will be of use in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
The title is “Atlantic City Is Offering Bidder The Chance To Blow Up A Former Trump Casino” , The link is https://www.npr.org/2020/12/17/947540932/atlantic-city-is-offering-bidders-the-chance-to-blow-up-a-former-trump-casino. For example, the article contains a reliable publication, author, statistics and accuracy. The essay has a sponsor, clear thesis, informative content and unbiased information. At the same time, we didn’t spot any grammar or spelling mistakes. I learned the importance of checking the source before using it. Many sources contain biased or opinionated information that might affect our own writing.

# data[].attributes.body
"Atlantic City is Offering Bidder the Chance to Blow up a Former Trump Casino"
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/17/947540932/atlantic-city-is-offering-bidders-the-chance-to-blow-up-a-former-trump-casino
I know this website is reliable because it is credible, accurate, reasonable, and well supported with evidence. The article comes from NPR, a publication with good reputation and notable credibility. The author, Colin Dwyer 's information can be verified and accessed directly from the artcle. In the article, there are linkages connected with each keyword that may be confusng to the readers. Dates like "Jan.29, 2009, 2014, etc." , organizations like Boys & Girls Club of Atlantic City , and characters like Mayor Marty Small and Donald Trump all proved to be true. The author uses an objective tone, unbiased and formal speech, and an essential purpose of informing readers to create a reliable article. Through this activity we learn how to determine the reliability of online articles and websites. We can compare the credibility and the quality of different sources to choose the best, most relevant evidence for our usage. With better evidence, we can maximize the usefulness and fully accomplish the purpose of our writings. This is not only beneficial for our current research paper, but will also be helpful for future informative writings.

# data[].attributes.body
"Help Save The Endangered Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus From Extinction"
https://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/
I know this website is reliable because...

# data[].attributes.body
After determining if the websites were reliable or not and filling out the worksheet, please post the following on this padlet:
1. Post the title of the website; link; evidence and reasoning as to how you know it is reliable or not
2. Answer one of the following questions - What did you learn from this activity? What is the significance of this activity? Why did we take the time to do this activity?