# data[].attributes.body
Graphing because all you have to do is graph because they are already set up for it.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because the equation is already set up

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because the equation is already in the form of y=mx+b so you don't have to change it quite so much.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution
Both equations are already y=mx+b so you can just set them equal.

# data[].attributes.body
Graphing, both equations are already in slope-intercept form.

# data[].attributes.body
Graphing as they are both in y=mx+b

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination, its easy to get inverse coefficients from the first equation.

# data[].attributes.body
I would chose substitution, because the top equation of the set, is very simple and would be easy to substitute into the other eqaution of the set.

# data[].attributes.body
I would use substitution because both are already in slope intercept form

# data[].attributes.body
i chose elimination just because it is the easiest for me to understand and the equations lined up well

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination
It would be very easy to multiply the first equation by -2 and get inverse variables.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because both of the equations are already in slope intercept form.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution, one equation is already in slope-intercept, which makes it easy to plug into the other.

# data[].attributes.body
I would use elimination, because in order to get opposite coefficients you would only need to multiply the top equation by -2 and go on from there.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution. The equations already in y=mx+b

# data[].attributes.body
substirution because it's already in y=mx+b

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because they equation is also already set up for substitution

# data[].attributes.body
I would use elimination because there are two one step ways to get to inverse coefficients

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination becasue the inverse coefficients are already there

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination because it would be easy to get to the inverse coefficients of the equations.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution: The top equation is already set up for you.

# data[].attributes.body
elimination

# data[].attributes.body
For this equation I would choose elimination to solve the set, because if you multiply the top equation of the set by 2, you almost immediately line up the variables for elimination and are ready to move on and solve.

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination because the variables are already lined up and you just have to mutiply by two to one of the equations to get the inverse variable.

# data[].attributes.headline
graphing bc  its already set up how I like to solve

# data[].attributes.subject
graphing bc  its already set up how I like to solve

# data[].attributes.body
y=mx+b

# data[].attributes.body
elimination, because it is easy to make the inverse coefficients

# data[].attributes.body
I would use substitution because one equation is already in slope intercept form

# data[].attributes.body
elimination, you already have the the inverse coefficients

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination. The equations are set up where there are simpler steps to multiply them than any other method.

# data[].attributes.body
substitution, because the problem is set up for you, and i genuinely like the way we solve with substitution.

# data[].attributes.body
elimination because all you have t do is multiply by a -2

# data[].attributes.body
I would use elimination because there are two one step ways to get to inverse coefficients

# data[].attributes.body
I would do substitution because I feel like it is faster for me and you have one set up that way to just plug in.

# data[].attributes.body
Graphing because, it would be easier to find the lines when they're on a graph.

# data[].attributes.body
elimination because less steps were taken to get to the final answer and I understand elimination the best

# data[].attributes.body
I would use substitution, because one of the equations are already in y=mx+b, which could be plugged into the other equation.

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution
One equation is already in slope intercept form.

# data[].attributes.body
Graphing : Both equations are already in slope intercept form

# data[].attributes.body
I would use substitution for this set, because the top equation is very simple, and therefore easy to substitute into the equation below it in the set. making this problem a quick,easy, and simple solve.

# data[].attributes.body
elimination because you get the final answer in simpilar steps

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination there’s less steps to solve to get to the final answer

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination because it looks easy

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because they equation is also already set up for substitution 

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because it is already set up for substitution and would be quick to solve.

# data[].attributes.body
elimination, because it is simple to make a inverse coefficient for me

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because the equations are already in slope intercept form.

# data[].attributes.body
the equation is already set up for it to be solved in substitution which is easier

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution, the equation is perfectly set up to finish solving this way.

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination because it looks like all you have to do is multiply one of them by a small number

# data[].attributes.body
I would say substitution because
one equation is already in slope intercept form making it easier to solve.

# data[].attributes.body
I would use substitution. The top equation is already in slope intercept form. Just easier.

# data[].attributes.body
I would use Substitution because one equation is already in slope intercept form.

# data[].attributes.body
substitution because everyone else said so

# data[].attributes.headline
Substition because the equation is already lined up so it would be the easiest.

# data[].attributes.subject
Substition because the equation is already lined up so it would be the easiest.

# data[].attributes.body
evan

# data[].attributes.headline
Elimination because its the easiest to get lined up coeficients and start from there

# data[].attributes.subject
Elimination because its the easiest to get lined up coeficients and start from there

# data[].attributes.body
evan

# data[].attributes.headline
Subsitution because one of the equation are already in slope intercept form and it wouldnt hurt to change the other.

# data[].attributes.subject
Subsitution because one of the equation are already in slope intercept form and it wouldnt hurt to change the other.

# data[].attributes.body
evan

# data[].attributes.body
Substitution because it is already in slope- intercept form

# data[].attributes.body
Elimination because it is already set up and easier to do

# data[].attributes.body
substitution because one of the equations are already in slope intercept form and it would be easier to do