# data[].attributes.body
Manufacturers owe the final consumer of their product a duty of care (at least in the instance where the goods cannot be inspected between manufacturing and consumption). There need not be a contractual relationship, or privity, in order for the final consumer to sue in negligence.

# data[].attributes.body
The agreement between the Balfours was not a legally enforceable contract but merely an ordinary domestic arrangement. There was no intention to create legal relations and Mrs. Balfour could not sue for the alleged breach of it.  The decision of lower court was reversed by Court of appeal

# data[].attributes.body
This case is illustrative of the difference between an offer and an invitation to treat. It shows, in principle, goods displayed in a shop window are usually not offers.

# data[].attributes.body
An individual cannot escape a contractual term by failing to read the contract but that a party wanting to rely on an exclusion clause must take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of the customer.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Olley Vs Marlborough Court Ltd., 1949

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Olley Vs Marlborough Court Ltd., 1949

# data[].attributes.body
The case stood for the proposition that a representation made by one party cannot become a term of a contract if made after the agreement was made.

# data[].attributes.body
Where a written document is presented
to a party for acceptance, a reasonably sufficient notice shall be given of the presence of terms and conditions.
Notice will be regarded as sufficient if it will convey to the minds of people in general that ticket contains conditions.

# data[].attributes.body
Only the person to whom the offer is made can accept it. No other party can accept on behalf of the either party. According to me the judgement which is given in this case is right according to the facts of the case.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., 1893

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., 1893

# data[].attributes.body
A decision often cited as a leading case in the common law of contract, the Court of Appeal held that an advertisement containing particular terms to get a reward is considered a binding unilateral offer that is accepted by anyone who completes its terms.

# data[].attributes.body
=Agreement+legal(object+consideration)+writing+free consent+eligible person

# data[].attributes.body
Sec 2(a) explains a proposal or offer is said to have been accepted when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent.

# data[].attributes.body
Sec 2(a) - "When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of the other to such act, he is said to make a proposal"

# data[].attributes.body
Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other