# data[].attributes.headline
Risk of further erosion of education as public good

# data[].attributes.subject
Risk of further erosion of education as public good

# data[].attributes.body
In wake of crisis

# data[].attributes.body
Opportunities for developing knowledge and skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Initiatives that are co-developed and co-facilitated with local stakeholders can be better attuned to the characteristics of social and cultural contexts, and promote more engagement and ownership among learners.

# data[].attributes.headline
Opportunities for interactivity and dialogue 

# data[].attributes.subject
Opportunities for interactivity and dialogue 

# data[].attributes.body
Digital education might embrace progressive, interactive, dialogical and critical pedagogies that empower people with the abilities and dispositions to transform their communities, flourish as human beings, participate, and grasp the opportunities that emerge in contemporary societies. See principles for connected learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
Possibilities for a diverse and plural digital education.

# data[].attributes.subject
Possibilities for a diverse and plural digital education.

# data[].attributes.body
Greater possibilities for flexibility and adaptation to the particular contexts and specific social, cultural and economic realities.

# data[].attributes.body
The structural inequalities and the cultural, social, political and economic characteristics of specific contexts determine how digital education is deployed and how citizenship is exercised. One of the biggest challenges of digital education is to ensure the inclusion of all citizens in all social dimensions.

# data[].attributes.body
The market for surveillance technology (particularly plagiarism detection software, remote proctoring, and algorithmic retention solutions) is rapidly expanding in education, compromising student privacy, intellectual property, and interfering with progressive pedagogies.

# data[].attributes.body
The cost of education and other barriers to access inhibit broad and diverse engagement. Already marginalized students are more likely to face significant barriers. For example, there is a long existing and growing problem of food and housing insecurity among students, which directly affects the ability of students to engage fully in their education. There are both policy and pedagogical responses to this problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Digital education, offering educational opportunities in more and new modalities, can increase access (and remove barriers), but only if we critically interrogate our technologies, digital pedagogies, and engage more thoughtfully with students.

# data[].attributes.body
problem of privatisation and ed tech monopolisation of education in online learning/times of crises. Educational institutions are increasingly outsourcing core practices to external for-profit companies. Eroding education as public good.

# data[].attributes.body
Tensions between the protection of children and young people and their full participation. While protective measures are necessary, protection cannot be an excuse to curtail children and young people's rights to participate, being heard, access information etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Digital technologies are a key to empowering children and young people as citizens - digital citizenship. Pedagogical practices can foster civic engagement. Knowledge of rights must be translated in to civic action. Digital agency.