# data[].attributes.body
Lesson idea: introducing long division students can decide which process is correct and why?

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea: gallery wall where students make connections between the gallery items to their work and/or compare and contrast the different items in the gallery

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson idea: use the Argumentative Thinking for Jumpstart questions in ELA to begin a unit before the quickwrites.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea: Plant and Animal Structure. Argumentitive Discussion: Vertebrate vs. Invertebrate, comparing plant structures vs animal structures

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson idea: Introducing a new math concept.  Get them thinking about about problem solving techniques.  Which works best, why? etc

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea Michela Bennett - I would use photos to show denotation and connotation of words, or possibly to help explain tone and mood through the imagery in the photos.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea - For math I would use it to show students that there are different ways to calculate problems and still get the correct answer. I would ask if 1 way is better or more accurate than another.

# data[].attributes.body
What's the largest number between 0 and 1? Why do you think? (Be sure to give evidence and reasoning)

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea: Students can decide which process(es)are  give the correct.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea - Mandy G - I will use the Visual Inquiry Questions for Physics and Chemistry in 8th grade, Geology and Astronomy in 7th grade.  Also CER to help prep for Science benchmarks.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea:   Reflecting on students work.   Picture written thinking process of students work done differently have them provide a claim, reason and evidence to support their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea: In Math, giving students a number/answer and having them come up with a strategy to reach that number (Order of operations) and they can support their answer with evidence by showing their steps.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson idea: History/SS: Comparing/contrasting current events to past events. Making connections. Clearing up misconceptions. Providing voice. Making it real.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea: Students can analyze maps and ask questions about how to improve a specific map and how to use it with different forms of travel.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson idea Melissa Gipson  primary and secondary sources for 4th graders in social studies.

# data[].attributes.body
Julia Marshall: I would use this lesson idea to help students use inquiry to discover the scientific process

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Smaller, 1" x 1" x 2" plastic boxes with plastic and wood barriers and ball bearings were used quite successfully in ENSI and SENSI demonstration lessons. The boxes were obtained from a plastics store in Northern California. There are 8 colors available, but that is no longer the case.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Norma because she and I both think that image #2 is not a piece of paper like the others.

# data[].attributes.body
Lesson Idea-Eva: I would use the Creative Conversations example so that students can elaborate on their novel readings in their book clubs setting...maybe incorporate Padlet to hold students accountable for their conversations.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the fact that number four is about segregation.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with having to disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with my table in that three of the pictures focus on equality while one encourages inequality.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with another table about #2 being the most current, because, although it is true, it is the least strongest argument. The other arguments were stronger and based on historical facts/sound logic and this was surface level.

# data[].attributes.body
I most disagree with the idea that number 2 was the most current and the other 3 were historical.  It may be true, however, it isn't delving deep into the topics given nor providing more than a surface level understanding of the concepts.  If students responded in this manner, I would require them to return to it and find a deeper connection or understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
I most disagree with Brain because he was looking at the letters in the written word and deduced that picture 3 is the only picture that did not include the letter "i".

# data[].attributes.body
Marissa: I disagree with Brian because his interpretation was vague and unclear.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Brian because he stated that 1 is a living creature, while the others are all others were pictures or paintings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Lisa because 1,2,& 3 are about freeing people and #4 is the opposite.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Melissa because her evidence there was not as much information about DREAM ACT.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Amanda because she said #3 was not a living being.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Eva because her evidence wasn't as strong as the others.

# data[].attributes.body
Lisa Garon

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Melissa because her evidence and reasoning was not strong enough.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Marissa because I'm confused on her interpretations of primary and secondary sources

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Eva and Melissa because they had a weaker reason.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't disagree with anyone at my table.  They all valid evidence and reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Lisa and Norma because #1 is not man made and the portrait, painting, and rover are created by man.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with both Lisa and Marissa that picture number 3 could be the odd one out because it is not a representation of a living being, while the other three are.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Norma's statement that Number 1 is not like the others because it is a lifeform, and the others are manmade.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Valerie because she used science to see the connection that three of the objects required air to survive.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Diane because Diane because her reasoning for  her claim and the evidence the used to validate her claim.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with everyone in my group because they are presented valid evidence and reasoning. I don't think think there is an incorrect answer.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with two of my table mates, because we presented evidence based on images and living things.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Ed and Melissa because the claim and evidence that they both provided solidified my thinking and provided support for my learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mulvey because she stated that 1,2 and 4 were living beings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Alvarado and Bennett, because both made valid points with their claim, reasoning and evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Julia because she claimed that number 4 was a painting while the others were photographs taken.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Ms. Reyes, because she pointed out that #3 is an inorganic machine and the rest where all organic beings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Ed and Eva because the subject is different subject matter in 3 than in the others.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Kim's statement that number 1 has the best teeth, because I had not thought about the historical perspective of poor dental practices in history and of course, robots not having true teeth.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with both my table teammates because they both had valid evidence and reasoning to suppor their answer! yeah!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Marissa Mulvey: Lisa's stated that #3 was unlike the others because it is a picture of a non-living thing. She reasoned that the are three pictures are portraits/pictures (or resemble) living creatures/people. I agree with her because her reasoning is clear and effective.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Kimberly because pictures 2, 3, 4 do not have teeth, and she used historical fact about dental practices to back her argument up.

# data[].attributes.body
Welcome to our back channel. Add your thoughts to our engagement conversation.