# data[].attributes.body
If the right amount of nukes remain in the world, then deterrence is good because it works.

# data[].attributes.body
“The moral case against nuclear weapons, then, comes down to three specific propositions:

1. Nuclear weapons are immoral because their impact is so large that it is impossible to use them in a way that discriminates between military and civilian targets.

2. Nuclear weapons are immoral because the radiation from nuclear fallout does not discriminate between military targets and civilians.

3. Nuclear weapons are immoral because their impact is so large that a) they inevitably cause massive damage to civilian lives and property and b) there is no conceivable level of military usefulness that could justify that level of damage.”
http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/06/why-nuclear-weapons-make-the-world-more-peaceful/

# data[].attributes.body
This is a great point. Nukes aren’t precise, so they have huge limitations. Military’s are rather going to bomb key targets then mass murder civilians.

# data[].attributes.body
This political cartoon argues that nukes can be used for nefarious purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
What are Nukes?
- everyone knows what a nuke is
How are nukes?
- yes
What is nuclear deterrence?
- keeping nukes to instil fear in other countries. These country won’t bomb you because you have nukes.
What countries have nukes?
- United States, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Great Britain, probably Israel, and a few more.

# data[].attributes.body
- Nuclear deterrence is great... but only as long as world leaders don’t get jumpy
- Basically as long as the nukes don’t go off, we good.
- Keeping nukes is key
- Some countries shouldn’t have nukes