# data[].attributes.body
1. Niklas (katsushika Hokusai)
-  Woodblock printer
- lausuminen oli hyvää
- mielenkiintoinen
- puhui ymmärrettävästi ja kielioppi oli kunnossa
- powerpoint -esitys oli hieno
- joitain yksittäisiä sanoja olisi voitu ääntäää paremmin
- Good

2. Krista (Claude Monet)
- mieleen jäi että taiteilija yritti joskus itsemurhaa
- riittävästi kaikki perustiedot kerrottu, olisi voinut hieman pidempi olla
- lausuminen oli hyvää
- kielopppi oli hyvä ja kaiken ymmärsi
- Good

3. Annina (Rene Magritte)
- mieleen jäi, että hän maalannut paljon ja hän maalaa erikoisia maalauksia
- Annina puhui vähän liian nopeasti mutta sai silti selvää
- lausuminen oli hyvää
- Good

Arvioija: Matti Pekkanen

# data[].attributes.body
1. Henriika Lento, Yves Klein
- todella selkeitä kuvia ja hyvin tietoa, ei mitään ylimääräistä
- hyvin käytetty opittuja sanoja
2.  Anni Nurmi, William Hogarth
- hyvin tehty powerpoint ja avattu taideteoksien merkityksiä
- hyvä lausuminen
3. Eveliina Kankaanpää, Damien Hirst
- todella monipuolinen ja jäi paljon mieleen
- hyvin selitetty ja avattu taideteoksien merkitystä, hyvä lausuminen

Hanna Mikkolainen

# data[].attributes.body
1. Hanna Mikkolainen, David Hockney
There was many pics and stories about Hockney's paintings. Presentation was told clearly and with really good English. I learned much about Hockney's works of art. Presentation was so good!
2. Eveliina Kankaanpää, Damien Hirst
Evelina's presentation was so smooth and she spoke English very well and understandable. There were much information about works of art. I learned about Hirt's animal works which looked so interesting. Presentation was excellent!
3. Henriikka Lento, Yves Klein
Henriikka shows an interesting video about Klein to represent her presentation. She spoke good and understandable English. I learned that Klein made new shade of blue. Presentation were so good!

Anni Nurmi

# data[].attributes.body
1. Henriikka Lento, Yves Klein
- Henriikka's pronunciation was clear and her voice was smooth. The presentation was easy to understand and well put together. Her grammar was also mainly really good and her slides were simple yet good and the video was a great add to the show because it showed well the main style of the artist Yves Klein and the color he created.
Overall the content was good and the presentation was excellent.
2. Hanna Mikkola, David Hockney
- Hanna's pronunciation was good and her upbeat sound of her voice made it very pleasant to listen. Her used language was easy to understand and her grammar was good. Her slides were good and easy to follow and it represented well the style of David Hockneys paintings and showed well his use of vibrant colours. There was enough information of the artist.
Overall the presentation was excellent.
3. Anni Nurmi, William Hogarth
- Anni's content was simple and there was enough important information of Willian Hogarth. The slides had really good examples of the artist's artwork for example the slide where was two pieces of artwork about alcoholism and how it affects the cities.
Her pronunciation was clear and the language she used was very understandable and for my notice there wasn't really any grammar mistakes. Her voice was calm and clear which made it easy to follow the presentation and understand the context.
Overall the presentation was excellent.

Eveliina Kankaanpää

# data[].attributes.body
1. Pauliina Leino, John Constable

- Pauliina told widely about the artist and the presentation was well done.

2. Camilla Hännikäinen, Paul Cezanne

- Camilla showed a lot of paintings from the artist which was good for the presentation. She spoke english very well.

3. IIda Ouninkorpi

- Iida's speaking was easy to keep up with and the presentation was nicely long.

# data[].attributes.body
Maria Kangasniemi, Raphael
Pronounciation and grammar were good. There was good amount of information. Was very understandable.

Sara Puustinen, William Blake
Pronounciation and grammar were good, some improvent needed. The amount of information was good. It was easy to understand

Veeti Portimojärvi
Pronounciation and grammar were nice. Nice elegant slides. Information was very good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lauri Koivuniemi, Mark Rohko
There was enough information and the pronunciation was good. The language was understandable and rich. I learned that he painted abstract paintings. Overall the presentation was good.
2. Camilla Hännikäinen, Paul Cezanne
There were a lot information about the artist's personal life. The slides were good and pronunciation as well. The language was understandable. I learned that the artist got married although the relationship was not good. Overall the presentation was good.
3. Iida Ouninkorpi, Johannes Vermeer
The paintings were chosen well and pronunciaton was good. There were not any difficult words and grammar was good. I learned that the artist used different lightings in hispaintings. Overall the presentation was good.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Lauri Koivunen, Mark Rothko.
- information was enough and all of it was necessary. Language was understandable. I learned that he did abstract art.  Over all it was good, because it was interesting and well presented.
2. Pauliina Leino, John Constable.
-There was a good amount of information but some of it maybe wasn't completely necessary. In the slides there were pictures of the few paintings he had done. it was excellent, because it was easy to follow.
-There was good information and grammar was good too. There wasn't any difficult words and pituus was sopiva.  I learned that he used different kinds of lighting. Slides were . It was good, because it was made with time and ulosanti was good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lauri Koivuniemi, Mark Rothko: There was enough information and good enthusiasm. Good pronunciation. Voice was audible. I learned about the artist. rate for presentation: excellent because it was well prepared and nice.
2. Camilla Hännikäinen, Paul Cézanne: Good information and pronunciation, slides were great. I learned about the artist's paintings. rate for presentation: excellent because information was good and presentation was nice.
3. Pauliina Leino, John Constable: Enough information, great slides and understandable language. Good pronunciation. I learned about the artist and his paintings. rate for presentation: excellent because it was prepared well and information was good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ella Eronen, Rembrant. There was lot of information and pronunciation was good. There was couple pretty hard words which wasn't explained but language was understandable. Slides were good. I learnt that the picture in our book is painted by Rembrant. Presentation was good because there was lot of information but it wasn't practiced very much.
2. Lauri Hopia, Jackson Pollock. Presentation included lots of nice to know information and there wasn't any problems with the pronunciation. There wasn't too hard words and Lauri explained couple of them. Voice was clear and understandable. Slideshow was short but it didn't matter. I learnt about abstract art. Presentation was almost excellent but there was still few faults which is OK.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ella Eronen, Rembrant. Pronounciation and grammar were good. Very informative with ok slides. Almost excellent. I enjoyed the presentation overall. I learnt new things about Rembrant which was nice.
2. Otto Mäntyniemi, Henri Matisse. Clear voice. Was easy to understand. Very informative speech with nice grammar and pronounciation. I had never heard of Henri Matisse so I learnt a lot. Better than good but not quite excellent. Would listen again.

# data[].attributes.body
Aleksiina Asell 17A
1. Annastiina Varpainen - Paul Gauguin
Pronounciation was good and clear and used words were understandable. Not much grammar mistakes, and loads of information about the artist's works. Performancing was clear and loud enough.
Rate: good, almost excellent.
2. Laura Huttunen - Michelangelo
Contents was good. There were enough information about the paintings and new info about the most famous artworks. Pronounciation was nice and clear and she had good contact to her audience.
Rate: Really good
3. Veikko Törmälehto - Hiroshige
A lot of information, not much difficult words. Pronounciation was good enough. I learned a lot about Hiroshige since I had never heard about him before. Not much grammar mistakes.
Rate: Good
4. Jenna Tuominen - Leonardo da Vinci
Loads of information, maybe even too much. Pronounciation was great. There were many interesting specs about da Vinci's works. Voice was loud enough and clear. Language and grammar were good. I learned a lot about restoration process.
Rate: Excellent

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ada
Edward Hopper
Very good info, no difficult words. Good pronounciation and good grammar.
Slides were nice.
Edward hopper, i learned about him that he was a very important realist in America.
The presentation was good.
2. Mikaela / Hane
Marcel Duchamp
A lot of info. Clear pronounciation. the dia's were nice. Overall a good presentation.
3.Annika, Wassily Kadinsky
enough info to get an understanding about the man
4.Paavo
Andy Warhol
Lots of information. The powerpoint presentation was interesting and vibrant.

# data[].attributes.body
Hanna Mikkolainen: David Hockney
Good presetation and clear pronounciation and grammar. Paintings were presented thoroughly. There could have been a little more information for exemple about artist's style. I hadn't heard of David Hockney before so I learned that he has done many different types of art.

Anni Nurmi: William Hogarth
Good presentation. There was enough information about both artist and his paintings. Slides were good. I learned about William Hogarth's paintings, that were also new to me. Anni could have spoken a little louder.

Eveliina Kankaanpää: Damien Hirst
Excellent presentation! Pronounciation was very clear and fluent, and presentation was easy to follow. There was enough information. Some difficult words weren't explained enough. I learned that Damien Hirst has done shark sculptures.

Henriika Lento

# data[].attributes.body
Veera Pystynen, Salvador Dali
The presentation had lots of information and I think it was interesting. I learned that Salvador Dali is named after his brother who died before Dali was born. Pronunciation was good and language understandable. The presentation was easy to follow. The powerpoint could have been more interesting and the pictures bigger.

Tuuli Marttila, Marc Chagall
Pronunciation was very good but I wish you had talked more slowly. The information about the paintings was good and the powerpoint slides were nice. I learned that Chagall used many different techniques in his painting, for example etching and watercolour. The presentation was good.

Kristian Saurio, Hans Holbein
A lot of good and interesting information. Your presence was really good and it made the presentation easy to follow. The powerpoint was also great and the paintings in the presentation were cool. I learned that many of Holbein's paintings don't have names.

Jasmin Kukkola

# data[].attributes.body
1. Vertti
Good amount of information about the paintings and the painter. The pronunciation was not perfect but it was good to listen to and every word was understandable. Slides were simple enough that they didn't take away anything from the presentation, but added into it. I learnt that Picasso was quite a ground breaking artist at the time and liked to brake the rules. Good
2. Maria
A lot of information about the artist and his works. Speaking showed that you might not be that used to speaking English, but that's an easy fix. The slides had quite much stuff in them, but they remained clear enough. Overall good presentation, that was easy to understand. Good
3. Sara
Clear and short enough to keep listeners interested. Maybe not well enough practised, but it is what it is. Pronunciation and language were understandable and clear. Satisfactory

Veeti Portimojärvi

# data[].attributes.body
1. Vertti Peltomäki - Picasso: It could have been more information about Picasso's background but information about Picasso's works of art were told well. Language was very understandable and grammar was good. Voice was clear and hearable but you could concentrate on pronouncing little bit more.
I learned that Picasso wanted to break rules of art.

2. Sara Puustinen - William Blake: The presentation was good but it could have been little bit longer. Your pronouncing and grammar was good and voice was loud enough. You explained well what kind of artist Blake was and what kind of his works are. Slides were visualized good.
I learned that Blake's art was sybolism and kind racist.

3. Veeti Portimojärvi - Vincent Van Gogh: Your language woke up interesting of the presentation because your language was clear and colorful. There could have been more slides and information about Gogh's works of art.
I learned that Gogh was a Dutch painter and he used lot of colours in his works.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lauri hopia
Jackson Pollock
Lots of information and the artist's life was opened to the listener, as was the art works too. Few difficult words was left unclear but overall the language was very understandable. Pronunciation was not the strongest part but it was covered with the other parts of the presentation. Learned that Jakson made the kind of art that some people might call making a mess. Slides were nice and clean. Not excellent but a touch better than good!
2. Otto mäntyniemi
Henri Matisse
Many specific information from the events of artist's life. Artist's art genre was nicely presented. Difficult words were opened well to the listeners. Pronunciation was a bit rough but the language was still well understandable. Slides were well made. You could see that Otto had studied about the artist since he didn't read much from the paper. Matisse did lots of different type of artworks during his life like sculptures, paintings and papercut works. Almost excellent

# data[].attributes.body
1. Maria: A lot of specific information and the power point was good. Pronouncing was really good and easy to understand. Good eye contact many times. I learned about the artist's life and artwork. Good
2. Vertti: Very clearly presented and everything was pronounced really good. There was a lot of information and the presentation was interesting to listen. I learned a lot about Picasso's style and about him. Good
3. Veeti: There was enough of information and the pronouncing was excellent. Speaking was loud enough and interesting to listen. I learned about Vincent van Gogh's mental health issues and about his art style. I also learned that he killed himself. Good

Sara Puustinen

# data[].attributes.body
Niklas Lenander
Katsushika Hokusai
I learned that Katsushika is japanese.
Niklas didn't pronouce some words very well.
Allthought he spoke in a way that everyone understood fine.
There were enought information.
The presentation was good.

Krista Pentti
Claude Monet
I learned that this artist was taught to paint by another artist.
Kristas work was kind of short, but did tell the Basic informations.
She pronouced pretty well.
I liked the Picture that she showed us.
The presentation was good.

Matti Pekkanen
Frida Kahlo
I learned that she was in a traffic accident.
Matti spoke very clearly, but pronouncing was a little bit hard.
His powerpoint was quite simple but good.
The presentation was good.

Annina Pekkola 17C

# data[].attributes.body
1. Niklas; Katsushika Hokusai
Hokusai is japanese and he is woodblock printer.
Niklas's presentation was good.
Puhui selkeästi hyvällä tahdilla. Paljon erilaista tietoa sekä hieno power point.

2. Matti; Frida Kahla
Frida was in car accedent.
Matti's presentation was good.
Matilla oli hieman lyhyt esitelmä, mutta tietoa tuli riittävästi, sekä puhui selkeästi. Matilla oli myös hyvä power point esitys.

3. Annina; Rene Magritte
Magritte todisti äitinsä itsemurhan ollessaan 12-vuotias.
Annina's presentation was good.
Anninalla oli paljon erilaista tietoa taiteilijasta sekä hänellä oli hyvä power point esitys. Annina puhui selkeästi, vaikka ehkä hiukan jännittyneisyys näkyi esityksessä.

Krista Pentti

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ada, Edward Hopper
It was a good presentation. I understood everything and it was very fascinating. She spoke clear and there was much information on the presentation.
Excellent
2. Mikaela, Marcel Duchamp
The presentation was nice. Good pronouncing. I learned that Duchamp played chess.
Excellent
3. Annika, Wassily Kandinsky
Great presentation. Could speak a little louder. I got lots of information.
Excellent
4. Paavo, Andy Warhol
5. Oskari, William Turner
Interesting presentation. Good slide show. I learned that Turner was born in London.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ada, Edward Hopper
Well done presentation, it included lots of information about the paintings, but you could've told more about the artist. Pronunciation was clear and understandable. You could've spoke a little slower. Slides were nice. I learned about his painting style for example in his paintings are often windows. Excellent presentation.

2. Mikaela, Marcel Duchamp
Good presentation. Pronunciation was good and accent really nice. There was enough information and you told all the important stuff. You spoke a little bit fast, but it was still understandable. I was surprised about the fact that it took so many years for him to paint one artwork. Excellent presentation.

3. Paavo, Andy Warhol
Nice presentation. Speaking was clear and loud. Slides were clear. You could've told a little bit more information. I learned that there is a big museum only for his artworks and that his paintings cost a lot. Excellent presentation.

4. Oskari, William Turner
Amazing slides! You spoke a little too fast. A lot of information. I learned that his mother was a wig maker and his father was a barber. Good presentation.

Annika Stenberg 17D

# data[].attributes.body
Mikaela Piirainen,  Marcel Duchamp
-good presentation. I liked the slides and there were a lot of information. Good pronouncing but I didn't understand everything. Not much text on the slides. I learned that Duchamp played chess. Excellent presentation
Annika Stenberg, Wassily Kandinsky
-a lot of pictures and there was no text on the slides which is a huge plus. Pronouncing was clear but you could have talked a little faster. The presentation was a little short. I learned Kandinsky painted abstract art. Good presentation
Paavo Haapamäki, Andy Warhol
-Very good pronouncing, clear and  understandable. Much information about the paintings and a lot pictures. I learned that Warhol had a museum. Little short. Good presentation
Oskari Mäkinen, William Turner
- Small pronouncing mistakes and you talked a bit too fast. Very good slides and a lot of pictures about Turner's paintings. I learned that Turner was born in London. Good presentation.
Ada Haapaniemi

# data[].attributes.body
1. Aleksiina Asell
- Calm and clear presentation. Small pronunciation mistakes that affected grammar. The slides followed speech naturally and the flow of the presentation didn't feel stuttery. The basic information well included. I learned how Paul Klee's art style changed over the years. Satisfactory.
2. Annastiina Varpainen
- Excellent pronunciation and good amount of information. Pictures were clear and well placed. The presentation done with minimal help from notes. No notable grammar mistakes. Good.
3. Laura Huttunen
- Good vocabulary and pronunciation. Short and compact, but excellently made. Well structured and uncluttered presentation. I learned that Michelangelo was a poet too. Good.
4. Veikko Törmälehto
- Personable and interesting presentation. Good attempt at pronouncing japanese :). The slides were clear and well made. The pace of the presentation unhurried and especially understandable for that. I learned how overproducing and copycats lower artist's value. Good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ada, Edward Hopper
- Good and clear presentation
- Included enough information
- Grammar was okey, some things could have been clearer
- The slides were interesting and they didn't have much text in them  which was good
- I learned that Edward Hopper was one of the most important realistic painter in America
- presentation was excellent
2. Annika, Wassily Kandinsky
- The slides were clear and interesting
- I learned that its said that the artist could hear colours
- Language was understandable and the presence was good
- presentation was excellent
3. Paavo, Andy Warhol
- Interesting information about the paintings
- Good pronunciation
- Enough information
- I learned that the artist has a big museum and very expensive artworks
- presentation was excellent
4. Oskari, William Turner
- Good amount of information and understandable language
- I learned that the artist was born in London got never married and died of cholera
- The slides were simple and the artworks were beautiful
- presentation was excellent

# data[].attributes.body
Jasmin Kukkola (Peter Paul Rubens)
-Good presentation
-Had good information about the paintings
-Could speak a little louder
-A little short of a presentation
-It was easy to pay attention
-Overall very clear and an excellent presentation

Veera Pystynen (Salvafor Dali)
-Well thought out presentation
-A lot of valuable information
-Very easy to follow
-Very good pronunciation
-A little bit too fast-paced
- Could explain the paintings little bit more
-Overall a very good presentation

Tuuli Marttila (Marc Chagall)
-Good pronunciation
-Good information about the artist
-Could speak a little bit slower
-Could explain the paintings more
-Overall easy to follow and understand; nicely done presentation

by: Kristian Saurio

# data[].attributes.body
Jasmin Kukkola: Peter Paul Rubens
The presentation was easy to follow and the English was grammatically correct. The slides were clear and fitting.
I learnt that Peter Paul Rubens often painted about mythological women.
Good: All in all a good and informative presentation, you could have talked a bit louder and clearer.
Veera Pystynen: Salvador Dali
The slides were interesting, but they had a bit too much text but overall the presentation was easy to follow. The language was understandable, clear and the grammar was really good. I learnt that Salvador Dali was one of the best surrealists of his time.
Good: All in all an interesting presentation. The visual aids could have had less text in them and maybe more pictures.

Kristian Saurio: Hans Holbein
The presentation was really good. The eye contact was good and it was nice that you didn't have to read from the paper. There were some grammatical mistakes. Powerpoint was good and it sounded like you really had researched the facts carefully. I learnt that Hans Holbein often painted self-portraits.
Good: A really good presentation, easy to follow. Some grammatical mistakes.

Tuuli Marttila 17B

# data[].attributes.body
1. Krista: Klaude Monet
Taiteilija ajatteli tekevänsä itsemurhan, sai naisen raskaaksi.
Could have been longer, enough basic information
Äänenkäyttö oli hyvä. Picture of the most famous work. Language was ok and good presentation.
Good
2. Matti: Frida Kahlo
Powerpointti was simple and good and nice pictures. She painted lot of self-portraits. Language would have been better and little too short presentation.. Kokonaisuudessaan hyvä esitelmä.
Good
3. Annina: Rene Magritte
Surrealistic painter Painted normal things wierd places. Filosofi. Saa töihin vaikutusta äidin itsemurhasta.
Lenght of the powerpoint was good.Language was good, you can notice she was nervous, but it was well presented.
Good

Niklas Lenander

# data[].attributes.body
1. Aleksiina Asell - Paul Klee
There was enough information and the words were understandable. The pronounciation could have been better, but I still understood everything. The grammar had some mistakes. The slides had a few pictures of the paintings which were nice. She didn't use any keywords, except for the ones on the slides. Rate: Satisfactory, because it was a compact one and I learned something about the artists backgroung, but the oral part could have been a bit more rehearshed.

2. Annastiina Varpainen - Paul Gauguin
Words and the language used was clear, except for some minor grammar mistakes. Paintings were nicely explained. The slides were neat and there was no extra text in them. She used some key words but didn't read the presentation straight from the paper. Rate: Good, because it explained interesting facts about the artist and especially about his paintings. The pronounciation could have been a tiny bit better.

3. Veikko Törmälehto - Hiroshige
The language and the words were clear and I understood everything. The artists background was well explained so I learned a lot from that artist because I had never heard of him before. The artworks were explained as a part of his life so it was interesting. He used some keywords written on a piece of paper but the speach was still fluent. Rate: Good, because everything said and showed in the presentation made sense. The talking was fluent except for some minor grammar mistakes.

4. Jenna Tuominen - Leonardo Da Vinci
The words and the language was rich and understandable, but the pronounciation could have been better, so it would have made the presentation even more understandable. The pictures on the slides were used in an informative way. A video was shown to explain a technique that the artist used, that was interesting. The presentation teached me about a technique used to brighten up old paintings. She had some keywords but didn't really use them. Rate: Good, because the presentation was very informative and interesting, but the oral part could have still been better.

Laura Huttunen

# data[].attributes.body
Aleksiina Asell, Paul Klee
There was enough infromation. There was little mistakes in the grammar. Slides were good and simple. Language could have been little bit more stronger and enthusiastic. I learned that Paul Klee painted almost 9200 paintings. Good, because it followed the rules of presentation that were given and it kept everything nice and simple.
.
Laura Huttunen, Micelangelo
Very good presentation.  There could have been maybe a little more new information. The sculptures were explained very good. The language was very good and understandable. Slides were good. I didn't learn anything new other than he was a poet also. Excellent, because the presentation had very good pronunciation, information and slides on point.

Veikko Törmälehto, Hiroshige
Little bit lack of eye contact to the audience. There was enough information. The presentation was understandable and slides were good. Language could have been little more enthusiastic, but voice was clear and I understood everything. Good, because it had all the stuff that was needed and everything was good.

Jenna Tuominen, Leonardo da Vinci
Good eye contact to the audience. The presentation had quite messy slides. Good and understandable language. Quite good pronunciation. Great use of video about restoration. The presentation had very much information about Leonardo.

Annastiina Varpainen

# data[].attributes.body
1. Aleksiina Asell, Paul Klee
Pronunciation and use of grammar were good overall with some minor mistakes. Language was very easy to follow. The presentation could have been a bit more enthusiastic and there was only little eye contact. I learned some basic information about Paul Klee's life, but surprising facts or difficult words weren't brought up. Satisfactory, basic information and little eye contact/enthusiasm

2. Annastiina Varpainen, Paul Gauguin
There was a slight lack of eye contact but the presenter didn't constantly stare at her computer screen either. The presentation was very easy to follow when it comes to the pronunciation and there were no mistakes in grammar whatsoever. Post-impressionism wasn't explained. I learned about Paul Gauguin's post-impressionist artworks. Good, a couple of artworks explained in detail

3. Laura Huttunen, Michelangelo
Pronunciation was very pure, native-like almost and grammar, too. I discovered that Michelangelo was also a poet. There could have been more eye contact and enthusiasm as well.  Good, new facts and great pronunciation

4. Jenna Tuominen, Leonardo da Vinci
There was a couple of times when I missed a few things about the presentation due to the pronunciation and some words just disappeared or melted together. The presenter had a bit of flu so that was probably the reason why. A lot of eye contact and great grammar. Before this presentation I didn't know that Da Vinci had his own painting technique and some of his works of art have gone through restauration. Excellent, very thorough conclusion about Da Vinci's art and a lot of detailed information about his techniques

Veikko Törmälehto 17D

# data[].attributes.body
Jasmin Kukkola
Peter Paul Rubens
The presentation was really good and easy to follow. The structure was good, but it could have been a little longer. Pronunciation was really good and easy to understand. I really liked the photos on the slides. The precentation was good overall. I learned about Peter Paul Rubens paintings.

Tuuli Marttila
Marc Chagall
I learned a lot of Chagalls first painting I and the Village. He painted it early in his career. The presentation was interesting and easy to follow. Pronunciation was excellent and there were no grammar mistakes. It would've been nice to hear a bit more of  his personal life. The powerpoint was good and the pictures were really nice.

Kristian Saurio
Hans Holbein
I really loved the presentation, the paintings were really interesting especially the one which had the skull. It was easy to follow and you made it really intresting to listen. Pronunciation was good and there were no grammar mistakes. It really felt like you had learned about this artist and his paintings. You had a good contact with us and asked us questions. The presentation was excellent.

Veera Pystynen 17C