# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses several of the issues schools are currently having with reading instruction. One of these issues is the idea that struggling readers are not exposed to enough text that they're able to be successful with .

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
what really matters with struggling readers.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
So Long, Robot Readers

# data[].attributes.body
How to Reach Struggling First Grade Readers gives a good overview of reading intervention strategies that could be implemented for readers struggling in a variety of different reading tasks.

# data[].attributes.body
The summary of my resources, as well as how those resources could impact my research.

# data[].attributes.body
Blue: Questions/Comments I have
Yellow:  Making a case for the importance of reading fluency
Purple:  Possible strategy ideas
Red: Possible data measurement ideas

# data[].attributes.body
How can I improve the reading fluency of my second grade students?

# data[].attributes.body
Although many of my students do read on grade level, the majority of the students who are not performing on grade level are performing below The Teacher's College guidelines for where they should be as a second grade learner.

# data[].attributes.headline
Strategies I'm contemplating to improve fluency.

# data[].attributes.subject
Strategies I'm contemplating to improve fluency.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Repeated reading from a passage.
2. Repeated reading as part of a reader's theater group.
3. Modeling reading with fluency through classroom read aloud.

# data[].attributes.body
Since research shows that students there is a large correlation between fluency and comprehension, I believe that by improving the fluency of my second grade readers, they will also improve in the area of comprehension.

# data[].attributes.body
This article examines the connection between reading fluency and reading comprehension.

# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses that idea that there has been a decrease in the importance placed on reading fluency in the classroom. The author believes that this is a mistake, and supports this claim with evidence that links reading fluency (more than just speed) to the way students comprehend.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose this article because its focus is on the correlation between reading fluency and comprehension. It also offers the results of a study that support the idea that there is no stronger correlation to reading comprehension than reading fluency.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
What Is Fluency?

Fluency is the ability to read "like you speak." Hudson, Lane, and Pullen define fluency this way: "Reading fluency is made up of at least three key elements: accurate reading of connected text at a conversational rate with appropriate prosody or expression." Non-fluent readers suffer in at least one of these aspects of reading: they make many mistakes, they read slowly, or they don't read with appropriate expression and phrasing.

​ Developing reading fluency with Read Naturally Strategy programs

Key Concepts

Why Is Fluency Important?

For many years, educators have recognized that fluency is an important aspect of reading. Reading researchers agree. Over 30 years of research indicates that fluency is one of the critical building blocks of reading, because fluency development is directly related to comprehension.

Here are the results of one study by Fuchs, Fuchs, Hosp, and Jenkins that shows how oral reading fluency correlates highly with reading comprehension.

To interpret this type of correlation data, consider that a perfect match would be 1.0. As you can see, oral recall/retelling, fill in the blank, and question answering are all above 0.6, which indicates there is a strong correlation. But oral reading fluency is by far the strongest, with a .91 correlation.

Many researchers, including Breznitz, Armstrong, Knupp, Lesgold, and Pinnell, have found that fluency is highly correlated with reading comprehension-that is, when a student reads fluently, that student is likely to comprehend what he or she is reading.

Why are reading fluency and reading comprehension so highly correlated? Dr. S. Jay Samuels, a professor and researcher well known for his work in fluency, put forth a theory called the automaticity theory. According to Dr. Samuels, people have a limited amount of mental energy. If you want to multitask or to become proficient at a complex task such as reading, you first need to master the component tasks so you can do them automatically. For example, a reader who must focus his or her attention on decoding words may not have enough mental energy left over to think about the meaning of the text. However, a fluent reader who can automatically decode the words can instead give full attention to comprehending the text. To become proficient readers, our students need to become automatic with text so they can pay attention to the meaning.

See also:

Challenges Faced by Non-Fluent Readers

Students become fluent by reading. Some students learn to read fluently without explicit instruction. For others, however, fluency doesn't develop in the course of normal classroom instruction.

Research analyzed by the National Reading Panel suggests that just encouraging students to read independently isn't the most effective way to improve reading achievement. Too often, simply encouraging at-risk students to read doesn't result in increased reading on their part. During sustained silent reading, at-risk readers may get a book with mostly pictures and look at the pictures, or they choose a difficult book so they will look like everyone else and then pretend to read.

Even if at-risk students do read, they read more slowly than the other students. In a 10-minute reading period, a proficient reader who reads 200 words a minute silently could read 2,000 words. In the same 10 minutes, an at-risk student who reads 50 words a minute would only read 500 words. This is equal reading time but certainly not an equal number of words read.

These students need to read more, but just asking them to read on their own often doesn't work. The National Reading Panel has concluded that a more effective course of action is for us to explicitly teach developing readers how to read fluently, step by step.

Research-Proven Fluency Strategies

How do we explicitly teach students to read fluently? The National Reading Panel found data supporting three strategies that improve fluency, comprehension, and reading achievement-teacher modeling, repeated reading, and progress monitoring.

Teacher Modeling

The first strategy is teacher modeling. Research demonstrates that various forms of modeling can improve reading fluency. Examples of teacher modeling include:

Teacher-assisted reading

Peer-assisted reading

Audio-assisted reading

Teacher modeling involves more than just listening to someone else read. Students must be actively involved 100 percent of the time and in a multisensory way.

Teacher modeling teaches word recognition in a meaningful context, demonstrates correct phrasing, and gives students practice tracking across the page. A child can benefit from teacher modeling once he or she knows at least 50 sight words and has a good sense of beginning sounds.

The reading rate of the model reader is important. Christopher Skinner, a reading researcher, found that students who read lists of words with him slowly were more fluent with the words than students who read with him at a faster rate. The slower rate enables students to learn new words and clarify difficult words. As students learn more words, they naturally become more fluent.

Another form of modeling is the neurological impress method. In the neurological impress method, a proficient and a struggling reader read together from a passage, with the more able reader reading near the rate of the struggling reader. Heckelman (1969) showed that after 29 15-minute sessions, 24 seventh- through ninth-grade boys, who were an average of 3 years behind in reading, gained an average of 1.9 years in reading based on the Oral Gilmore and the California Achievement Test.

Repeated Reading

Another technique that research has shown significantly builds reading fluency is repeated reading. In fact, the National Reading Panel says this is the most powerful way to improve reading fluency. This involves simply reading the same material over and over again until accurate and expressive.

In the 1970s, LaBerge and Samuels studied what happens when students read passages over and over again. They found that when students reread passages, they got faster at reading the passages, understood them better, and were able to read subsequent passages better as a result of the repeated reading.

Repeated reading is a form of mastery learning. The students read the same words so many times that they begin to know them and are able to identify them in other text. Besides helping students bring words to mastery, repeated reading changes the way students view themselves in relation to the act of reading.

Progress Monitoring

People who play video games are presented with a specific goal and with immediate, relevant feedback about their progress toward that goal. This combination of having a goal and getting feedback on progress can be very motivating.

Progress monitoring takes advantage of this combination to motivate students to read. You give students a specific, individual reading goal, and you tell them exactly how you're going to know they've met it. Then, you give them the means to measure how they're doing. Finally, you make it simple enough that they'll know they've met their goal even before you do. This progress monitoring is what motivates students to practice reading the same story over and over until achieving mastery.

​Developing Reading Fluency With Read Naturally Strategy Programs

The research-based Read Naturally Strategy combines these three strategies into highly effective programs that accelerate reading achievement. Students become confident readers by developing fluency, phonics skills, comprehension, and vocabulary while reading leveled text. The time-tested intervention programs engage students with interesting nonfiction stories and yield powerful results.

Learn more about the Read Naturally Strategy
Research basis for the Read Naturally Strategy

The Read Naturally Strategy is available in a variety of formats:

Choosing the right Read Naturally Strategy program

One Minute Reader®
Structured, supplemental reading program for developing literacy skills independently. Available in these formats:
One Minute Reader Live (component of web-based Read Live for supplemental reading at school)
One Minute Reader books/audio CDs (for a school-to-home checkout program)

Bibliography

Armstrong, S. W. (1983). The effects of material difficulty upon learning disabled children's oral reading and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, pp. 339-348.

Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing first graders' reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), pp. 236-242.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), pp. 239-256.

Heckelman, R. G. (1969). A neurological-impress method of remedial-reading instruction. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 5(4), pp. 277-282.

Hudson, R. F., H. B. Lane, and P. C. Pullen. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how. Reading Teacher 58(8), pp. 702-714.

Knupp, R. (1988). Improving oral reading skills of educationally handicapped elementary school-aged students through repeated readings. Practicum paper, Nova University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 297275).

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, pp. 292-323.

Lesgold, A., Resnick, L. B., & Hammond, K. (1985). Learning to read: A longitudinal study of word skill development in two curricula. In G. Waller & E. MacKinon (eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. New York, NY: Academic Press.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP's integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade 4 (NCES Publication 95-726). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.

Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: Its development and assessment. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction, 3rd ed., pp. 166-183. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Samuels, S. J. (1997). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 50(5), pp. 376-381.

Samuels, S. J. (2006). Towards a model of reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels and A. E. Farstrup (eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Samuels, S. J. (1997). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 50(5), pp. 376-381.

Skinner, C. H., Logan, P., Robinson, S. L., & Robinson, D. H. (1997). Demonstration as a reading intervention for exceptional learners. School Psychology Review, 26(3), pp. 437-447.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What is fluency? Reading at a conversational rate with accuracy and expression. Why is fluency important? Fluency directly correlates to comprehension.

# data[].attributes.body
This abstract is written by a student who previously conducted research on the impact of a reader's theater program to improve fluency. I think it's valuable to me because it specifically discusses data collection strategies, such as Reading A-Z, the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) assessment, and the Multidimensional Fluency Scale (MFS.)

# data[].attributes.body
This resource examines the usefulness of reader's theater and poetry as a way to improve fluency. I keep coming across poetry as a way to improve fluency, so while I feel my focus will be on using reader's theater to improve fluency, I'd like to see if poetry can be incorporated into the reader's theater.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Considering the Context and Texts for Fluency.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses the benefits of using repeated reading as a strategy to increase fluency and comprehension. I'm thinking the repeated reading exercise could be completed in a reader's theater setting.

# data[].attributes.body
This article advocates for rhyming poetry as a strategy to improve reading fluency. This is a strategy I've never thought of before. Would there be a way to use rhyming poetry in conjunction with reader's theater?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Alternative Text Types to Improve Fluency.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
This resource is valuable to me because it focuses on repeated reading as a strategy for reading fluency, and discusses in detail the positive aspects of using reader's theater as a strategy to improve fluency.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Improving Oral Reading Fluency through Reader's Theater.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
This article looks at strategies to limit the variability of progress monitoring of oral reading fluency. Since the ORF is one of the ways I may collect data, this article could potentially be helpful in making sure the results are valid.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Strategies for Minimizing Variability in Progress Monitoring of Oral Reading Fluency.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
This resource introduces several instructional strategies I could use to improve reading fluency including modeling fluent reading through a whole class read aloud and assisted reading in either a one on one setting or through the use of technology.