# data[].attributes.body
Economically, urban sprawl is a poor use of land. Mixed zone is far more efficient. Urban sprawl is nicer and people tend to prefer going there. So there is an equity issue how people cannot afford to live in suburbs. Mixed zone is better for the environment with less carbon emissions.

# data[].attributes.body
Wind energy is much better for the environment than fossil fuels. It does not release carbon emissions. Fossil fuels are cheaper for poor people, which is a positive. I do not like supporting middle east countries, so I like wind energy much more.

# data[].attributes.body
Organic food is better for the environment. It is more efficient and

# data[].attributes.body
Organic food is far better for the environment than processed food. Processed food is much cheaper for low income families, but it does not sustain their health well.  It is far less efficient for farms to use land to produce Cheetos than to make celery.

# data[].attributes.body
Single rider is much worse for the environment. It increases the release of carbon emissions. This is an equity issue because poor people must use a multiple rider, which is not fair. It is more economical to be in a multiple rider system as far as gas goes.

# data[].attributes.body
Garbage in landfills release fumes into the atmosphere which is bad for the environment. It is a poor use of land because it is inefficient. These are also predominantly in poor neighborhoods which is an equity issue. Economically it makes is land that could be sold for agriculture and it is expensive to maintain.

# data[].attributes.body
Recycling is good for the environment. By reusing the materials people are more efficient with their use. There is no equity issue as everyone can recycle. It is good for business as there is a lesser cost for materials.