# data[].attributes.body
50-50, this is as the ethical considerations which are focused on in experiments are sometimes too strict therefore if an experiment were to follow these regulations word by word, these experiments would in a way be seen as useless and not provide any valid information. Yet if there are ethical values which are disobeyed, it should be backed up on why it was disobeyed in the first place and the extent it did not follow regulations.

# data[].attributes.body
the researcher should ensure that their experimental guidelines don't breach any ethical rules and that the experiment has no influencing factors.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, they do have high ethical responsibilities when working with human subjects. There are different standpoints and is a controversial topic of whether animals should be treated the same as humans for ethical considerations. But in reality, the most important/historically changing experiments are done with animal experiments which did not follow ethical considerations. Eg. medicine

# data[].attributes.body
Experiments that may harm the test subjects in anyway physical or pyschological, which would impact the participants in a negative way

# data[].attributes.headline
Depends on your ethical limits, if you have none any type of knowledge can be sought.

# data[].attributes.subject
Depends on your ethical limits, if you have none any type of knowledge can be sought.

# data[].attributes.body
Experiments that do not follow basic ethical considerations such as personal consent from the subject, guaranteed confidentiality, and other ethical rules like voluntary participation and no harm to be inflicted on the subject.

# data[].attributes.body
From a relativism point of view, society believes that this is exploitation of individuals rather than an experiment due to the moral grounds of society.

# data[].attributes.body
Experiments that involve the usage of personal information of the participants should be avoided on ethical grounds. For example, it is a well known fact that Facebook collects data on its users to enhance their experience on the social media site. However, this is ethically not correct as the personal information can be misused for dishonest purposes.

# data[].attributes.headline
anything to do with genocide and eugenics should not be pursued. bad faith pseudo-science in the case of the latter.

# data[].attributes.subject
anything to do with genocide and eugenics should not be pursued. bad faith pseudo-science in the case of the latter.

# data[].attributes.body
Human sciences have opinions that are less value-free than natural sciences as each theory conjured is subjective to the individual. In comparison, natural sciences tend to have knowledge that is factual and supported by evidence making it more restrictive.

# data[].attributes.body
Experiments related to mental health and research into physical structures of the brain (invasive)

# data[].attributes.body
Intrinsically some areas of knowledge could be argued to be more beneficial to the development of society such as philosophy and art often being regarded as useless. However, this is wrong as cultural development is as important as scientific development as cultural development often leads to scientific development, and without the incentive to research a certain idea or push certain ideas scientific research in certain fields would simply cease to exist.

# data[].attributes.body
Values are different with each individual, as such it is hard to quantify such matters.

# data[].attributes.body
Ethical responsibilities are always important in research, however, ethical responsibilities to society also have to be considered. Certain research has to be considered to be necessary for the "greater good"

# data[].attributes.body
There are already existing organisations that deal with regulating experimental guidelines such as the APA. However these are only for the psych branch of Human sciences

# data[].attributes.body
Researchers have a major ethical responsibility when working with human subjects because they have to ensure the subject's safety in the experiment, ensure their confidentiality is always maintained for every subject. If these are not followed, they can come under heavy scrutiny from the public about their methodology for finding their results. Examples of this could include the Stanford Prison Experiment which cause multiple mental issues for both the subjects and the researchers.

# data[].attributes.body
Researchers have an ethical responsibility when working with participants. This is monitored by organisations with examples such as BPS (British Psychological Society) These standards, however, are much more lax with animals as animals are seen less than that of humans

# data[].attributes.body
A utilitarian stand point would be that research should be done by all means necessary, however, this could have negative implications such as the cost of life and suffering. This could be a debate of whether the expense of an individual is worth the greater good, being the positive effects of the research being conducted.