# data[].attributes.body
when things like war and violence are brought into a situation, most of the time nothing is solved until one of the sides surrenders.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like violence will only spread the problem but i also feel like violence could be used to end it.

# data[].attributes.headline
at first try non violence but use force if necessary 

# data[].attributes.subject
at first try non violence but use force if necessary 

# data[].attributes.body
nobody 'wins' in cases of extreme violence

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that it is the best way, because so much in history has been changed with non-violence. Violence is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
It really depends on how the people react

# data[].attributes.body
Diplomacy should always be the first resort. Violence should always be a last resort. Only after you have talked, and negotiated, and marched for change is violence justifyable.

# data[].attributes.body
Non-violence is the best way to achieve change, but it does not always work. It does work when there is no violence involved, but as soon as it is, violence may be necessary.

# data[].attributes.body
Nonviolence can be used to achieve change, but it is much more difficult to achieve change because some people might not feel the need to change and just trying to convince them with words might just not be enough.

# data[].attributes.body
i think it can go either way, i think its good because its better to not fight fire with fire, but sometimes it might not be strong enough and violence could show the strength. but i think its better to not choose violence

# data[].attributes.headline
yes because people can come to a decision without people getting hurt

# data[].attributes.subject
yes because people can come to a decision without people getting hurt

# data[].attributes.headline
It depends, although non-violence could achieve change, there is a high chance that it does nothing.

# data[].attributes.subject
It depends, although non-violence could achieve change, there is a high chance that it does nothing.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the time because violence can become a domino effect and can lead to much larger issues, which makes the protest basically counterproductive

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes because violence on one side just leads to violence on both sides of a movement. It would continue to escalate. However, sometimes peaceful protests are not enough if the nation completely ignores them.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes because violence on one side just leads to violence on both sides of a movement. It would continue to escalate. However, sometimes peaceful protests are not enough if the nation completely ignores them.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that it depends on the situation because if you want change now you should choose violence but if you can be patient and wait for that change you should choose non violence 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that it depends on the situation because if you want change now you should choose violence but if you can be patient and wait for that change you should choose non violence 

# data[].attributes.body
that way compromise can occur

# data[].attributes.body
sometimes it isnt. sometimes non violence doesnt achieve anything.