# data[].attributes.body
"No person shall be......deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

# data[].attributes.body
This right was created in reaction to the excesses of the Courts of the Star Chamber and the High Commission, British courts of equity that operated between 1487 and 1641. These courts used the inquisitive method of seeking truth instead of prosecution, which it means that the prosecutors did not have the burden of proving a case, but that sufficient “evidence” came from the intimidating confessions of the defendants.

Madison had come to appreciate the importance voters placed on these protections, the role enshrining them in the Constitution could play in educating people about their rights, and the possibility that adding them could prevent his opponents from making more drastic changes.

# data[].attributes.body
After four Black men were held under dangerous circumstances and forced to confess to murder charges under duress, they were convicted and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court, to its credit, took issue with that. Justice Hugo Black wrote for the majority:

"We are not impressed by the argument that law enforcement methods such as those under review are necessary to uphold our laws. The Constitution proscribes such lawless means irrespective of the end. And this argument flouts the basic principle that all people must stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court. Today, as in ages past, we are not without tragic proof that the exalted power of some governments to punish manufactured crime dictatorially is the handmaid of tyranny...."

# data[].attributes.body
Tennessee law enforcement officials broke down a suspect during a 38-hour forced interrogation, then convinced him to sign a confession. The Supreme Court again represented here by Justice Black, took exception and overturned the subsequent conviction:

"The Constitution of the United States stands as a bar against the conviction of any individual in an American court by means of a coerced confession. There have been, and are now, certain foreign nations with governments dedicated to an opposite policy: governments which convict individuals with testimony obtained by police organizations possessed of an unrestrained power to seize persons suspected of crimes against the state, hold them in secret custody, and wring from them confessions by physical or mental torture. So long as the Constitution remains the basic law of our Republic, America will not have that kind of government."

Confessions obtained by torture are not as alien to U.S. history as this ruling suggests, but the Court's ruling at least made these confessions less useful for prosecutorial purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
The fifth amendment is without a doubt a right that everyone needs, since it helps in criminal proceedings. Every person needs the right to a trial, for any crime that he has committed, since in this it can be shown if he is guilty or not; In addition, it helps citizens not to be subjected to the same charge twice, their rights are recognized, and it protects citizens from self-incrimination.