# data[].attributes.body
The raw milk movement is dangerous, but don't overreact

# data[].attributes.body
When Good Grammar Gets Snobbish

# data[].attributes.body
A.I. Is Already Reshaping Us

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dr. Sanjay Gupta explains what we do — and still don’t — know about pain

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
“Pain is a mysterious thing,” says neurosurgeon Dr. Sanjay Gupta. But understanding how it works in the body and different kinds of treatment can help you find the right pain relief when you need it.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What “The Pitt” Taught Me About Being a Doctor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It’s as if the show’s creators absorbed every important conversation in health care today—and somehow transfigured it into good television.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Siddhartha Mukherjee: Metabolism is the next frontier in cancer treatment

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Siddhartha Mukherjee, oncologist and author of “The Emperor of All Maladies,” asks: What if we change what a tumor can eat?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Microplastics Are in Your Body. Regulation Is Still Catching Up.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Adding microplastics to a watchlist starts a process that could take years to produce actual limits.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sally Jenkins, The Atlantic (Formerly Washington Post)

# data[].attributes.subject
Sally Jenkins, The Atlantic (Formerly Washington Post)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Shot That Killed Duke but Saved March Madness

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nostalgists worried that giving players more rights would ruin the game. This year’s NCAA tournament is proving them wrong.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ilia Malinin’s third world championship a relief. Redemption? Think 2030 | Opinion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ilia Malinin ‘felt really relieved’ by his world championship performance on March 23. But he said ‘real redemption’ will come in 2030.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Wetzel: Don’t blame hoops scandal on changing society. It’s just clumsy greed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
These players selfishly betrayed their common sense, their teammates and, ultimately, themselves, Wetzel says.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shireen Ahmed - Senior Contributor | CBC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shireen Ahmed is a multi-platform sports journalist, a TEDx speaker, mentor, and an award-winning sports activist who focuses on the intersections of racism and misogyny in sports. She is an industry expert on Muslim women in sports, and her academic research and contributions have been widely published. She is co-creator and co-host of the “Burn It All Down” feminist sports podcast team. In addition to being a seasoned investigative reporter, her commentary is featured by media outlets in Canada, the USA, Europe and Australia. She holds an MA in Media Production from Toronto Metropolitan University where she now teaches Sports Journalism and Sports Media. You can find Shireen tweeting or drinking coffee, or tweeting about drinking coffee. She lives with her four children and her cat.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Inside the NBA’s Great Generation War (GQ, 2023)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The latest on the NBA’s investigation into the LA Clippers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What was actually in Leonard’s contract? What do league insiders think of it? Here’s what we know about the allegations -- and where the investigation stands.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Players’ Tribune | The Voice of the Game

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Players’ Tribune is a sports media company that provides athletes with a platform to connect directly with their fans, in their own words.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Opinion | Opinion - Health Care (Published 2010)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Opinion articles on the debates around health care reform and its implementation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Nilay Patel Profile and Activity | The Verge

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nilay Patel is editor-in-chief of The Verge, host of the Decoder podcast, and co-host of The Vergecast.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Founder and editor of Platformer, a publication about the intersection of tech and democracy. Prior to founding Platformer in October 2020, Newton was the longtime Silicon Valley editor of The Verge.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
On the business, strategy, and impact of technology.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Find the latest Wired Opinion news from WIRED. See related science and technology articles, photos, slideshows and videos.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Technology coverage from the Opinion section of the New York Times, its columnists, editorial board and other contributors.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Rick Hess is the director of Education Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of Education Week’s Rick Hess Straight Up opinion blog. He is the creator of the annual RHSU Edu-Scholar Rankings.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jill Barshay, Author at The Hechinger Report

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Covering Innovation & Inequality in Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Matt Barnum is the editor and a columnist for Chalkbeat Ideas, a section devoted to explaining and examining the ideas and debates shaping American schools. Before launching this section, Matt covered K-12 education for the Wall Street Journal. While there, he chronicled the ways technology is changing schools and broke news about the Trump administration’s plans to close the Education Department. Prior to that, he helped start Chalkbeat’s national coverage in 2017 as that team’s first reporter. Matt’s reporting has been recognized by the Education Writers Association and the American Educational Research Association. He was also a Spencer fellow in education journalism at Columbia University and started his career as a middle school language arts teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
Opinion: What gladiatorial politics will bury in this year's midterms

# data[].attributes.body
Trump Needs Smarter Sycophants

# data[].attributes.headline
Rich Lowry, National Review / King Features Syndicate

# data[].attributes.subject
Rich Lowry, National Review / King Features Syndicate

# data[].attributes.body
Why Taylor Swift Is Making Conservatives Crazy

# data[].attributes.headline
Ben Shapiro, Daily Wire / Creators Syndicate

# data[].attributes.subject
Ben Shapiro, Daily Wire / Creators Syndicate

# data[].attributes.body
In Today’s NBA, Beliefs Can Be a Firing Offense

# data[].attributes.body
Brace Yourself for the AI Tsunami; Inventors and executives are warning of widespread consequences that they don't begin to understand.

# data[].attributes.headline
Victor Davis Hanson, Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.subject
Victor Davis Hanson, Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.body
Can The ‘Lost Generation’ Be Found?

# data[].attributes.body
Trump's 'I Can't Believe It's Not Butter' Budget; The president's 2027 budget request chooses guns over domestic spending and gives Congress its preferred cuts.

# data[].attributes.headline
Jonah Goldberg, Dispatch/Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.subject
Jonah Goldberg, Dispatch/Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.body
Voter ID shouldn't be this controversial

# data[].attributes.body
I told the internet I use AI. Boy, was it mad.

# data[].attributes.body
Pittsburgh is pivoting. It could be a lesson for Democrats.

# data[].attributes.body
We Are Gambling Away Our Future

# data[].attributes.body
The absurdity of imprisoning parents for their children’s crimes

# data[].attributes.body
Why Minnesota Matters More Than Iran for America’s Future: Thomas L. Friedman

# data[].attributes.body
How Trump Can Wrap Up the War

# data[].attributes.body
Voters Still Want Normalcy; Biden and Trump both failed to deliver it. Will Democrats do any better in 2026?

# data[].attributes.body
Trump isn’t hiding his election power grab. He’s bragging about it.

# data[].attributes.body
It’s the 1970s Again. Democrats Should Study Up on Reagan

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why a President Should Never Pick a Fight with a Pope

# data[].attributes.body
This Is Not a Man in Control of Himself

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
There will be many post-mortems on the demise of the Orbán regime. The stunning victory of Hungary's opposition was delivered by an electoral surge so large that it swamped the anti-democratic breakwaters the regime had erected to maintain its grip on power.

A full analysis of why Hungarians repudiated Orbán will surely contain many details unique to Hungary. However, it's also clear that there were three main factors that led to Orbán's overthrow. And understanding these factors is important if Americans are to defeat Trump's MAGA regime.

First, Hungarians view themselves as part of democratic Europe - not as a satellite of Russia. Hence they wanted an end to autocracy and their freedoms restored.

Second, but just as importantly, they were voting against Orbánist corruption. For example, drone-taken videos showing the Orbán family's luxury country estate reportedly received wide play within Hungary:

Autocracy and corruption aren't separate issues. In practice they inevitably go hand in hand. They're a natural pairing, like crypto and crime, because authoritarian rule removes accountability and opens the door for Grand Theft Autocracy. There's even solid statistical evidence:

What Hungary has shown the world is that autocratic corruption can be a powerful mobilizing issue.

The third factor is that Hungary was a "soft" autocracy: Orbán maintained the superficial trappings of democracy, such as elections, while undermining the underpinnings of democracy, with actions such as intimidating opponents, installing a corrupt judiciary, capturing the media, and silencing any independent voices. However, because Orbán still allowed a general election to be held (no doubt under pressure from the European Union), a mass movement of voters was able to defeat him.

What does the "new Hungarian Revolution" mean for the U.S. today?

An immediate lesson is the political power of highlighting corruption as we try to defeat our own home-grown autocrats. Corruption is something every voter can understand, unlike abstract principles in defense of democracy.

The self-dealing during Trump I was, in fact, unprecedented in American history. Recall how lobbyists and foreign potentates booked pricey rooms in Trump's Washington hotel? But under Trump II blatant corruption has run wild at the highest levels of government, on a scale like nobody has ever seen before. Trump and his family have used his office to extract billions in de facto graft, through crypto deals with petro-state autocrats, investments in prediction markets and defense contractors, making sweetheart foreign real estate deals that line up with favorable tariff treatment, soliciting hundreds of millions for Trump vanity projects.

Oh, yes, then there is the Epstein affair...

While the average American voter may (unfortunately) tolerate some small-scale corruption by those in power, the level of corruption we are now seeing is so vast that it has become a cancer, that is eating away at the heart of the U.S. government.

Want to stop a data center in your community and impose common-sense controls on AI? Well, that's a non-starter because the Trump family has invested in data centers and in AI firms. Want to regulate crypto and stop its use as a vehicle for crime? Well, um, no, because the Trump family has amassed billions from their crypto holdings. Want to rein in the pernicious effects of prediction markets. I don't think so, because the Trump family invests in Polymarket. Want to shift America towards safe, clean renewable energy? Think again, because petrostate oligarchs have poured $500 million into Trump's World Liberty coin.

I could go on, but I think you get the point. Trump promised to drain the swamp, but under his rule the swamp drains you.

And everyone can see it.

Like Orbán, Trump is trying to solidify his own version of soft autocracy by destroying the American system of democratic checks and balances - such as corrupting the Justice Department, bullying Democratic states, and delivering CNN into the hands of the Ellisons.

The possibility that should truly terrify us is that Trumpian levels of corruption and its accompanying authoritarianism will become normalized in America. And that's the game plan of the autocrat: the public comes to believe that resistance is futile because the regime controls so many levers of power and has corrupted so many people and institutions.

The good news from Hungary is that blatant corruption doesn't have to be normalized. In fact, public perceptions of runaway corruption can become a weapon in defense of democracy. The public understands corruption, hates it, and can be mobilized to vote en masse against it.

Hungary has shown the way. Will America follow?

Note for readers: At noon ET today Heather Cox Richardson and I will start a series of lunchtime Substack live conversations:

MUSICAL CODA

The Empire strikes Bach. No reason.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What the U.S. resistance can learn from Hungary

# data[].attributes.body
The Election in Hungary Signals Trouble for Conservatism

# data[].attributes.body
The $1.3-Million-a-Minute War

# data[].attributes.body
The Sphinx Thinks It Stinks

# data[].attributes.body
How to Fix the Democratic Party's Toxic Brand

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Hasan Piker has attracted millions of followers across multiple social-media platforms, making him one of the most popular left-wing streamers. He has been the subject of several flattering magazine profiles that have lingered over what they describe as his handsome looks and bodybuilder physique. Some progressives see him as their long-sought entry point into alternative media that can reach a young, mainly male, audience.

But he is most important as a stand-in for a fight over whether the Democratic Party should be open to, or even dominated by, militant anti-Zionism. Although he allowed, after October 7, 2023, that "the Palestinian resistance is not perfect"-who hasn't raped, kidnapped and massacred 1,200 civilians from time to time?-he defends Hamas as "a thousand times better than the fascist settler-colonial apartheid state." He has likened the leaders of Hezbollah, a terrorist arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, to Nelson Mandela.

A debate over American policy toward Israel is likely to divide the party in the next presidential-primary cycle even more clearly than Medicare for All divided it in 2020-even as many voters aren't invested in the debate at all. The Democrats' establishment opposes terrorism and backs a two-state solution; Piker and his allies want to cast that position as de facto support for the status quo, which is a single state controlled by Israel.

If the establishment has any hope of holding on to the party, rather than surrendering it to the Piker wing, it will need to defy that characterization by recognizing that facts on the ground have changed. Political morals and public opinion are pushing in the same direction: ending American financial support for Israel.

For decades, the Democratic Party's consensus on Israel has combined diplomatic, military, and economic support, including several billion dollars in annual aid, and a friendly push for a two-state solution. In theory, Democrats have supported the national aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians while giving themselves room to condemn Palestinian terrorism along with the excesses of Israel's occupation and West Bank settlement project.
Read: An end to U.S. military aid to Israel may be closer than you think
The theoretical case for a two-state solution remains as sound as ever. The trouble is that the Palestinian side has rejected repeated attempts by Democratic presidents to bring about the birth of a Palestinian state, and that Israel's longest-serving prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his right-wing coalition do everything they can to subvert such a solution. At some point, supporters of the two-state solution have to take "no" for an answer. The United States is effectively supporting a one-state solution whose entire strategy rests on an endless cycle of responding to terrorism with military force (a process of periodic attacks that Israel calls "mowing the lawn") in place of any diplomatic path.

Netanyahu represents a parliamentary majority that has run the country for two decades. He has undermined diplomacy repeatedly by, among many other acts, lobbying against the Obama administration's nuclear deal with Iran, propping up Hamas in Gaza before October 7 (to ensure that Palestinians didn't have leaders he might be expected to negotiate with), and proposing that the Trump administration go to war with Iran.

At the same time, Israel's standing with the American public has cratered. In four years, its favorability in one Pew Research Center survey plunged from 55 percent to 37 percent. The trend is reflected in other polls, and it has a steep age gradient. Young people in both parties now feel overwhelmingly negative toward it.

Sentiment within the Democratic Party is far harsher than among the general public. Rahm Emanuel is now saying that Israel can buy American weapons but should no longer get them for free. Say what you will about Emanuel, but he can read a poll.

If moderate Democrats continue to support giving Israel (which is getting more unpopular) military aid (which is broadly unpopular), they will sentence themselves to obsolescence. Social-media accounts such as AIPAC Tracker-which defines AIPAC as including organizations such as J Street, a liberal group that now favors ending aid to Israel and is bitterly opposed to AIPAC-have gained wide circulation. Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, who is not backed by AIPAC, recently was accused by a student at a public event of accepting support from "pro-Israel lobbies." More and more, pro-Palestine activists treat acceptance of Israel's existence in any form as genocidal.

The most essential task for liberal Zionists is to separate their ambitions from the stubborn realities of Israel's government. Liberal Zionists can say that they oppose the status quo and favor two independent states, but as Israel's willingness to trade land for peace recedes further into historical memory, those pleas sound detached from reality. The traditional Democratic posture is becoming outright impossible as long as the party continues to support sending billions of dollars to Israel every year.

By 2028, two consecutive presidencies are likely to have incinerated political capital attempting to leverage the American alliance with Israel. If a Democratic president is going to succeed Donald Trump, not only must he or she emerge from a primary electorate that is likely to be highly skeptical of Israel, but the candidate must also win over a November electorate that is highly skeptical of foreign aid of any kind.

The winning alternative to embracing uncompromising Palestinian nationalism will not be reviving the American partnership with Netanyahu, or one of his would-be successors (the most plausible of whom, Naftali Bennett, opposes any Palestinian state). It will be pulling up stakes from the Middle East and letting Israelis and Palestinians figure it out for themselves.

Renouncing unconditional aid to Israel may seem like a full-scale surrender to the Piker wing of the Democratic Party. But Israel can survive without American assistance-even Netanyahu has proposed weaning his country off American aid in a decade or so. More important, to equate the withdrawal of the American subsidy with the left-wing position misconstrues just how radical the latter has grown.

Anti-Israel activists such as Piker are calling for more than an end to aid for Israel. They are demanding an arms embargo, which would prevent Israel from even purchasing defensive weaponry from the United States, and cultural and economic boycotts of Israel (but not any other human-rights violator).

The anti-Zionist left sees Israel not merely as a recalcitrant and overly aggressive power but as a fundamentally illegitimate state that is a source of unique evil in the world. Piker's reference to Israel as a "settler-colonial apartheid state" reflects a fashionable ideology that imagines Israel as an alien Western power that must be expunged so that the land can be turned over to its natural inhabitants.

That ideology propels activist groups that are pushing the party leftward. Every major pro-Palestinian activist group refuses to criticize Hamas, and either endorsed or justified the October 7 attacks. Students for Justice in Palestine, the umbrella group organizing campus protests, called the October 7 attacks "a historic win for the Palestinian resistance" over "the facade of an impenetrable settler colony." The Palestinian Youth Movement asserted, "We have a right to resist on our own land." Within Our Lifetime stated, "We defend the right of Palestinians as colonized people to resist the zionist occupation by any means necessary."

Among the leaders of the protests against the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 2024 was Hatem Abudayyeh, the national chair of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network. On October 7, 2023, Abudayyeh wrote on behalf of USPCN, "Palestinians have an internationally-recognized right to resist illegal military occupation, and today's attacks from the Palestinian Resistance should be understood as a legitimate response to unending violence from Israel's extreme right-wing, racist, white supremacist, zionist government and settler movement."

Revealingly, the movement is focused on Gaza, to the point where Gaza is often used as shorthand for its goals. Although Gaza has seen the worst carnage, it was also the staging ground for horrific mass attacks on civilians. Pogroms by Israeli settlers in the West Bank have no defensive rationale, yet they have received a fraction of the attention bestowed on Gaza. The most convincing explanation for this selective attention is that Gaza, but not the West Bank, is controlled by Hamas, and the pro-Palestinian activist network in the U.S. is in solidarity with Hamas.

The anti-Zionist left is pursuing what activists call an "entryist" strategy, in which members of a faction try to move into an existing party and convert it to their ideology. It's having some success.

Earlier this month, Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic candidate in Michigan's Senate primary, invited Piker to speak at a rally. El-Sayed's two Democratic opponents criticized him for campaigning with Piker, but fellow Democrats such as Summer Lee and Rashida Tlaib joined the event. Matt Duss, who has advised Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on foreign policy, leaped to Piker's defense, as did The New Republic's Aaron Regunberg and The Nation's president, Bhaskar Sunkara, among other progressives.

Piker was not even the most radical anti-Zionist to appear at El-Sayed's rally. Standing next to Piker was Amir Makled, a lawyer who has represented Michigan's student protesters, who is running for regent in the state. Makled has written and shared numerous posts praising Hezbollah and Iran's leadership, and has used Jew as a slur.

El-Sayed and his allies have defended his rally with Piker as the equivalent of appearing on controversial shows such as Joe Rogan's, logic endorsed by commenters such as Ezra Klein -as if doing an interview with a podcaster is the same thing as accepting their endorsement at a campaign rally.

The anti-Zionist left understands that Piker's views-which also run toward broad sympathy for China, Cuba, Russia, and authoritarianism in general-are repugnant to the majority of voters, even in a Democratic presidential primary. The main defense of Piker's appearance at El-Sayed's rally is that he is insignificant. Sunkara, enumerating a series of world crises, observed sarcastically in The Guardian, "So naturally, the Democratic Party has found something truly urgent to focus on: a Twitch streamer." El-Sayed himself made the same argument. "Our president is waging a genocidal, illegal, unjustifiable war with Iran that is torching our tax dollars to the tune of $1.5 billion a day," he said at his rally, and yet, "apparently the most important thing happening on Twitter was whether or not we were gonna campaign with Hasan."
Yair Rosenberg: 'The more I'm around young people, the more panicked I am'
If El-Sayed doesn't think that people should discuss his rally with Piker, why would he hold a rally with Piker? The answer, of course, is that he believes Democrats should discuss Piker, but only to agree with him.

This sort of deflection is a common move for political activists when their ally has done something too embarrassing for them to openly defend, but that they do not wish to condemn. They are recognizing the unpopularity of the views they want to mainstream.

But those views can prevail within the party only if the alternative is equally unpopular. At the moment, it is. Israel has alienated public opinion, a shift that began even before Israel encouraged and joined in a potentially disastrous war in Iran. Instead of meeting pro-Palestine activism with defiance, the more intelligent strategy for moderate Democrats would be to sever their political liabilities and compromise with public opinion.

Liberal Zionists can win an intra-Democratic argument against anti-Zionist radicals, but they can't win it while burdened with support for subsidizing settlements and a strategy of endless conflict. The most extreme anti-Zionist activists won't be satisfied with anything short of committing the Democratic Party to Israel's demise. But the most left-wing position in recent Democratic primaries-on Iraq in 2004, on health care in 2016-has rarely been adopted by the candidate who emerges as the party's eventual nominee.

The decisive bloc of Democrats includes those who are disgusted with Israel's policies and ready to wash their hands of American support for its maximalist strategy, but wary of going full Piker. Either mainstream Democrats will give up any illusions they have about the ugly nature of Israel's current government, or they will no longer occupy the mainstream of their party.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Israel Moderates Are Losing the Democratic Party

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Their position has become untenable. But liberal Zionists can adapt.

# data[].attributes.body
Why Americans Hate Data Centers: Let Us Count the Ways

# data[].attributes.body
Trillions of microbes live in your gut. If you treat them well, they'll do the same.

# data[].attributes.body
The $150 Train to a $2,000 Seat: The World Cup of Price Shock --- From transit costs to ticket prices, soccer's signature event feels like a competition to soak fans

# data[].attributes.headline
Mitch Albom, Detroit Free Press/ Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.subject
Mitch Albom, Detroit Free Press/ Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.body
Wolverines cast a spell with a team for the ages

# data[].attributes.headline
Bill Plaschke, Los Angeles Times/Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.subject
Bill Plaschke, Los Angeles Times/Tribune Content Agency

# data[].attributes.body
Plaschke: Stop trying to keep Roki Sasaki in the starting rotation. He belongs in the bullpen

# data[].attributes.body
A reliable virtual doctor? Not yet.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Kevin RooseKevin Roose is a technology columnist and a co-host of the New York Times tech podcast “Hard Fork.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Powerful A.I. Is Coming. We’re Not Ready.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Three arguments for taking progress toward artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., more seriously — whether you’re an optimist or a pessimist.

# data[].attributes.body
The hottest college major hit a wall. What happened?: Computer science has been a top pick for 15 years. Enrollment data suddenly shows a big drop.

# data[].attributes.body
San Francisco Killed 8th-Grade Algebra. Now It’s Set to Come Back.

# data[].attributes.body
Willpower Doesn't Work. This Does.

# data[].attributes.body
The Whisper Network That Brought Down Swalwell

# data[].attributes.body
Hegseth's Gospel of Carnage

# data[].attributes.body
A Paris Court Just Rewrote the Rules of Corporate Morality

# data[].attributes.headline
Walter Russell Mead, Wall Street Journal

# data[].attributes.subject
Walter Russell Mead, Wall Street Journal

# data[].attributes.body
Behind the Feud Behind Trump and Leo XIV

# data[].attributes.body
Inside View: The Algorithm Will See You Now

# data[].attributes.headline
Mary Anastasia O’Grady, Wall Street Journal

# data[].attributes.subject
Mary Anastasia O’Grady, Wall Street Journal

# data[].attributes.body
The Trouble in Trump's Venezuela

# data[].attributes.body
Life Science: Voting in California: All in Favor, Say 'Arf'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Family That Decided to Have Their Stomachs Removed

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Māori families with a mutation for aggressive gastric cancer have had their stomachs preemptively removed. How do you live without one?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The humble bean is the solution to America’s nutritional chaos.