# data[].attributes.body
Shows little to no understanding of the material, failing to identify even the primary perspectives on technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Struggles to grasp the main points of the audiovisual content, with minimal recognition of the arguments made about technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows some understanding of the audiovisual material but misses important details or perspectives regarding technology's impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows a strong understanding of the content with minor omissions. Identifies most perspectives and examples about the advantages and disadvantages of technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates a complete understanding of the audiovisual material, identifying all key points, examples, and perspectives regarding technologies, their advantages, and disadvantages.

# data[].attributes.body
Rarely or never uses technology-related vocabulary, with significant errors throughout.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates limited use of appropriate vocabulary for technology, with frequent mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows a basic knowledge of technology-related vocabulary but makes noticeable errors or repeats words frequently.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses appropriate vocabulary with few minor errors but might lack variety in word choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Consistently uses appropriate and varied vocabulary specific to technology with great fluency and accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas are confusing, unfocused, and poorly organized, greatly hindering understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Limited clarity and poor organization of ideas, making it hard to follow the argument about technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas are somewhat clear but lack consistent organization, occasionally hindering the discussion on technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas are clear and organized, with minor lapses in logical structure.

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas are exceptionally clear and well-organized, with a logical progression that fully supports the discussion on technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Does not participate or engage with the assignment discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Rarely participates or engages with the topic, contributing minimally.

# data[].attributes.body
Participates occasionally but lacks consistency in contributing to the discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Actively participates with interest and shares meaningful comments with few lapses in engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
Actively and enthusiastically participates throughout the discussion, consistently sharing thoughtful insights about the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Severe issues with pronunciation and fluency make the speech almost incomprehensible.

# data[].attributes.body
Frequent mispronunciations and lack of fluency significantly impede understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Speaks understandably but has noticeable issues with fluency and pronunciation.

# data[].attributes.body
Speaks fluently with minor mispronunciations that do not hinder understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Speaks with excellent pronunciation and fluency, making ideas easy to understand.